Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Cadinth Oligarchy

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Cadinth Oligarchy

  • Nominated by: NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:08, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: We

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 09:21, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
  2. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 10:29, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
  3. --DarthRageLeave a message after the beep 18:19, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Menkooroo 03:16, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Trayus
    • "during a conflict between the Republic and a militant secessionist faction, the Oligarchy's loyalty lay with the former." - You link the "militant secessionist faction" to the Confederacy, but it did not yet exist.
      • The CIS was founded in 24 BBY and this took placve during the Separatist Crisis, just before the Battle of Geonosis. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 06:16, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
        • Only according to our article. The databank entry states that it wasn't formally founded until the meeting on Geonosis. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 07:11, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
          • Then what was the fighting during the Separatist Crisis? That's what should be linked and, according to our articlce, that's the CIS, or what would become the CIS apparently. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 07:25, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
            • It was with various supporters of secession, not a specific organization or government. And remember, Wookieepedia is not a source. All you need to do is change "militant secessionist faction" to "supporters of secession from the Republic," no link required. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 08:02, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
              • I know it's not a source, but I put trust in it. Fixed on all articles now, though I've left the capitalization the same, per the actual article. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 08:48, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
    • For what it's worth, the NEC makes it clear the CIS existed under that name as early as 24 BBY. All the Databank says is that the CIS was "formally established" in 22 BBY - but clearly the disparate secessionist groups were already operating under that name, so it should be fine to use it in the article. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 14:18, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
    • The HNN article refers to the "rally" as an "uprising." You should adjust your wording for accuracy, and link to the uprising.
    • Can you specify that Bodis-Ker Vitan was the planet's watchman?
  2. Soresu
    • Similarly to Trayus' first objection, "separatist" shouldn't be capitalised, as that would refer to the CIS, which does not exist at this time.
      • Per above, it does. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 06:11, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
        • "Separatist" is capitalized in the actual article. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 08:48, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
    • Last sentence is long and could be split.
    • Once I review these 5, I will have reviewed all the nominations on the CAN =) SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 10:56, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Comments