Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Battle on unidentified skyscrapers

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Battle on unidentified skyscrapers

• Nominated by--Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:50, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Fan

• In the opening sentence, "Unidentified skyscrapers" is not any actual name for that location. You should swap out "at".
  • The opening sentence? The sentence is "During the Clone Wars, the Galactic Republic and Confederacy of Independent Systems clashed at several skyscrapers."--Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:42, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • Huh, my bad, didn't double-check closely. I still feel "at" is being used improperly there. Fan26 (Talk) 03:47, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
      • Not sure what it would be switched to--Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:26, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
        • I would recommend "on" instead of "at", and then also moving the page title to match. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 04:41, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
          • done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:52, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
            • Thanks for the help JMAS. Fan26 (Talk) 15:07, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
• The Republic strength list in the infobox could be a little more specific. It should be easy to get a number for the clones and Jedi. This should be included in the body too.
  • To be fair, there could have been more out of frame.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:42, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • There could have been more AT-TEs too, so that's why you said "At least 2". Fan26 (Talk) 03:47, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
      • Should I count the B1s?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:08, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
        • Actually done. Unless you want me to switch the numbers I wrote as words to be numerals to match the higher numbers--Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:46, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
          • I feel you should be consistent with using words instead of numerals in the body. Fan26 (Talk) 15:07, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
            • done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:37, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
• In the BtS: Where was this announcement? It's online, yes, that's stated in the External Links, but it should be made clear in the article.
  • Done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:08, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
• Also, Rise of the Separatists should have its release year noted in the BtS. Fan26 (Talk) 03:23, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  • Done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:42, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
• Please specify what Rise of the Separatists is in the BtS. Fan26 (Talk) 03:47, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  • Done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:23, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
• In the BtS: You don't need a separate sentence for the release dates. Try integrating the dates into the prior sentence. Fan26 (Talk) 17:12, September 22, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

• I'm bringing this up here before I put the {{Tc}} tag to it as a courtesy. I can't see any way that this article, which is about a battle solely based on a single image, meets any notability standard. FFG books are full of this kind of illustrations, and we can't create separate articles for each of them. In everyone's best interests, I believe you should give us permission to let us take down the nomination please. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:21, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  • If you feel it is necessary. You can take it down--Editoronthewiki (talk) 23:30, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • We will do so shortly. Thank you for your understanding. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:35, September 22, 2019 (UTC)