- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Battle of Mimban
(3 GCs/7 Users/10 Total)
Support
- Looks good after 3 attempts at a copy-edit and an edit conflict headache. :P —Master Jonathan
(Jedi Council Chambers) 22:38, June 1, 2010 (UTC) 
Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 23:48, June 1, 2010 (UTC)- NaruHina Talk
02:31, June 2, 2010 (UTC) 
Imperialles 07:05, June 2, 2010 (UTC)- --TK-299 (Click Here) 09:19, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 11:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- NAYAYEN:TALK 11:24, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:38, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- SOTME references in TCW? Good Lord. Thefourdotelipsis 04:31, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 08:04, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
Object
- Just a couple things
Kill that OOU "unidentified" in the infobox; even something as simple as like "Opposition to the Republic" might work better there- Addressed
How important is it to mention who heard the shout-out? Not really a request that you remove that bit; more of a suggestion. I won't obsess over it if you wanna keep it there. :P- The clones heard the shout-out, and it was mentioned onscreen, not off. :P If you want, I could remove it. JangFett (Talk) 23:45, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, like I said, I'm not gonna obsess over that one. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 23:48, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
- The clones heard the shout-out, and it was mentioned onscreen, not off. :P If you want, I could remove it. JangFett (Talk) 23:45, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 23:36, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
Even if it's barely anything, there still needs to be some kind of body. As it stands, the article is just a Bts.NaruHina Talk 01:26, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I agree with you. But sadly, those are the rules. Even if I can follow the LG, and I would, there's very limited amount of information in the article that cannot adhere to the GAN requirements. JangFett (Talk) 02:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- For this process, one should follow the LG if possible, but it is not a requirement due to the limited content of these articles. In this case, the "intro" really is the body, which is why it's sourced. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 02:17, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Ehhh, that don't sit right with me. If you open that door to not writing up any body, you open the door to people doing that for articles that can have a body (Which is any article, really, but I digress). NaruHina Talk 02:31, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Read rule 4 above. If it's within reason, then yes, there should be a body. But this is treated case-by-case, because a lot of these articles are just too small for that to be practical. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 02:40, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Ehhh, that don't sit right with me. If you open that door to not writing up any body, you open the door to people doing that for articles that can have a body (Which is any article, really, but I digress). NaruHina Talk
- For this process, one should follow the LG if possible, but it is not a requirement due to the limited content of these articles. In this case, the "intro" really is the body, which is why it's sourced. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 02:17, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I agree with you. But sadly, those are the rules. Even if I can follow the LG, and I would, there's very limited amount of information in the article that cannot adhere to the GAN requirements. JangFett (Talk) 02:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
<Can you state in the body/intro/intrody thing who gave the shout-out? Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 07:06, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
Comments