- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Balderdash
- Nominated by: NaruHina Talk
04:53, March 1, 2011 (UTC) - Nomination comments: I have two. Number One: Win on the parts of Mr. Hidalgo and Mr. Ens. *applause* Number Two: A prime example of why Wookieepedia is so addicting. You never know what you might turn up just before you sign off.
(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
- Master Jonathan (Council Chambers) Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 20:42 UTC
Menkooroo 07:01, March 10, 2011 (UTC)- OLIOSTER (talk) 23:01, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Object
- From the Council Chambers:
"being made by Myris Pictures in 23 BBY.": The date here is wrong, as 23 BBY would be the year before the HNN story was published (IU, that is). However, I'm not sure what to change it to. The story says "next summer", which depending on interpretation, could refer to the immediately following summer (22 BBY) or the summer of the following year (21 BBY). Unless we can be sure which one they're referring to, we should probably reword it to leave it ambiguous.- Either way, the article establishes that it was in production at the article's publishing date, meaning it was being made in 23 BBY. Whether or not it would be released in 23 or 22 per your logic is irrelevant to this article though that deserves a mention in the main QFQ article. NaruHina Talk
20:05, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
- I see your point, but the article's IU date (13:4:11) is 22 BBY, so saying it was in production the year before is OR. Change it to 22 BBY and I'll strike and support. Master Jonathan (Council Chambers) Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 21:30 UTC
- Either way, the article establishes that it was in production at the article's publishing date, meaning it was being made in 23 BBY. Whether or not it would be released in 23 or 22 per your logic is irrelevant to this article though that deserves a mention in the main QFQ article. NaruHina Talk
- Otherwise, looks good. Master Jonathan (Council Chambers) Saturday, March 5, 2011, 01:10 UTC
- Menkooroo
Can you mention that the HNN article originates from Balderdash, rather than just saying "it was related" ? If the reader doesn't have to go check out the original source in order to figure out something that the article says, that's definitely bettah.Menkooroo 04:14, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Mifune:
Why no Ref tags? SinisterSamurai 21:39, March 10, 2011 (UTC)- And even once more: because site policy says that ref tags on single-source articles are optional, and not required, as decided by CT. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 22:27, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments