- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Arthon
- Nominated by: Zed42 (talk) 07:38, April 13, 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: This one's a planet, at least... but only in the LEGO "continuity".
(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
Object
Anil
- (Reviewing note) Please keep in mind that image caption punctuation (i.e., a full stop, or period) is determined by whether the caption uses a complete sentence, per the Layout Guide. Also, file names, including images, should have underscores rather than spaces in their names.
Could you give a little context for the Ottegans? I think just saying that they were a sentient species should suffice."year 8011 in the C.R.C., which translates to 34 ABY." How exactly does it translate to 34 ABY?- Added an explanation. Zed42 (talk) 03:53, April 14, 2019 (UTC)
- I'd say you need to change or expand that note as Boonta Eve Classic is actually an annual event.
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:56, April 14, 2019 (UTC)
- Expanded it. Zed42 (talk) 23:33, April 14, 2019 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that doesn't solve the problem. How do we know that the Boonta Eve Classic in which Neva Kee disappears is the one that Galactic Atlas dates to 32 BBY?
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:53, April 15, 2019 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that doesn't solve the problem. How do we know that the Boonta Eve Classic in which Neva Kee disappears is the one that Galactic Atlas dates to 32 BBY?
- Expanded it. Zed42 (talk) 23:33, April 14, 2019 (UTC)
- I'd say you need to change or expand that note as Boonta Eve Classic is actually an annual event.
- Added an explanation. Zed42 (talk) 03:53, April 14, 2019 (UTC)
I think Flight Log also says that Lor San Tekka interacted with the Ottegans on Arthon, which should be reflected in the article."Whenever he surfaced, such as with the Ottegans on Arthon" Given the context for Arthon in Flight Log, I think it's fair to call it is an astronomical object.Could you expand a little bit about the LEGO game's depiction of Arthon? If we don't see the planet surface, you could at least talk about that BTS image.Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:02, April 14, 2019 (UTC)
Can we get a year for that web supplement please?Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:56, April 14, 2019 (UTC)
- By reading Assault on Arthon and watching some gameplay footage of that LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens level, I believe the BTS section of the game should be expanded. I would also recommend subsectioning the BTS, and including a quote from the game perhaps?
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:28, April 16, 2019 (UTC)
Spooky
In the BTS, I think it would be prudent to add a bit more information about the LEGO game; it's release month and year, and was developed by Traveller's Tales.It would also be helpful to note that Arthon specifically was a supporting component of "Ottegan Assault", an exclusive "Star Wars Adventure" level that was separate from the main adaptation levels.—spookywillowwtalk 03:03, April 14, 2019 (UTC)
Comments
- With answering to the latest objection, the article has gone over 250 words. I suppose it has to go to GA, then, even if it's mostly in the BTS? Zed42 (talk) 10:24, April 18, 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, with your permission, I can take down the nomination, so that you can go for a good article nomination.
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:33, April 20, 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, with your permission, I can take down the nomination, so that you can go for a good article nomination.