Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Arbo

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Arbo

  • Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 19:22, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Chirpa, you got served. ~ SavageBob 19:22, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. He got chirped. Menkooroo 17:20, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Darth Morrt 02:23, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ECvote --Eyrezer 10:21, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
  4. OLIOSTER (talk) 20:51, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object

  • Why don't you mention the Grundaak directly? Darth Morrt 08:02, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • The Duloks never mention the Gru[n]dakk by name at this point, so Arbo has no idea that's the creature they have in mind. It'd be a bit anachronistic to mention him by name, in my opinion. They've also framed the creature by creating fake tracks and whatnot, but I feel like going too deeply into their ruse would be off-topic for the article. ~ SavageBob 15:57, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • The cite_web in the middle of a sentence in reference 2 looks really yucky and detracts from the flow of the sentence. Can you give that reference some general cleanup? The amount of different sources mentioned and linked to is pretty confusing --- is there any way you can keep it simpler and to the point? Menkooroo 14:02, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • The references reference the things immediately preceding them, so that ref's just used for the date. I'm not sure how better to do this, since the date and name of the village are never given in the source. I could strip those elements out, but I don't think that would help the article. Are you suggesting I just lump all the refs for that sentence at the end of the sentence? That'd sacrifice accuracy for aesthetics, but it may be worth it. In other words: clarify your objection, Menk. :) ~ SavageBob 15:57, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • Wait, I think I understand: You mean the reference itself. How's that look? ~ SavageBob 16:04, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
      • P-p-p-perfect! Menkooroo 17:20, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • No image of him? Darth Morrt 01:29, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • Nope. The book shows Teebo, Logray, the Woklings that get kidnapped, and the warriors who go to fight the monster, but Arbo is not depicted. ~ SavageBob 02:24, February 14, 2011 (UTC)