Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Annexation of the northern Hutt territories

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Annexation of the northern Hutt territories

Nominated by: 501st dogma^(talk) 14:52, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments:Trasemene got too long for CAN, so Annexation beat him to being nommed

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

NaruHina ^Talk 11:17, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 12:36, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Tinwe^(comlink) 09:20, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
Menkooroo (talk) 20:40, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object

I see the map and why you thought to capitalize "northern," but that is not a proper noun. It was merely the start of the sentence. There is no political area called the "Northern Hutt territories." The Imperials claimed Hutt territories that were in the north. NaruHina ^Talk 07:05, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, moving the page to Annexation of the northern Hutt territories. There, done. 501st dogma^(talk) 12:23, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
Judging from the map arrow pointing to it, I would be inclined to say that the annexation was considered part of the Insurrection, so the "post" in the infobox would be unnecesary. However, if the prose says the annexation was "after" the insurrection then that line shoukd be removed from the infobox entirely. It was either part of the conflict or it was not. NaruHina ^Talk 06:15, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Trasemene ended the Insurrection, but the annexation was a direct result of the Insurrection. Would'nt it be okay to leave the "Post-Insurrection" part because it was an important factor? 501st dogma^(talk) 11:57, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
  - No, because it was not part of the insurrection itself. It was a big chunk of the aftermath, as in after the conflict had already concluded. That infobox field shoulld not have "pre" or "post" anything. NaruHina ^Talk 18:51, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
    - Got rid of Post, added Reconquest of the Rim as that was the general conflict. 501st dogma^(talk) 18:59, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
      - That works. Now the Reconquest of the Rim needs to be explicitly mentioned since that name is canonical. NaruHina ^Talk 20:33, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
        Better? 501st dogma^(talk) 20:38, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
        It was going to be a quick fix, so I did it myself. I ended up changing the article's structuring more thanI wanted too in the process though, how things are introduced. The issue was that both the Insurrection and the annexation were part of the Reconquest. NaruHina ^Talk 11:17, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
        Ok, thanks for changing it. 501st dogma^(talk) 11:21, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Hutt! Hutt! Hutt!
- "an Imperial campaign earlier that year designed to eliminate remnants of the Separatist army..." Does the text say that it's specifically the Separatist army? Army is specific to ground forces, but the Sy Myrthian Insurrection article indicates that Toonbuck has a fleet.
- ~~The infobox says that the Hutts are one of the affiliations involved, but the article proper makes no mention of this, only describing the conflict as occurring in their space.~~ Menkooroo (talk) 02:15, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
  - Both done. Thanks for the review. 501st dogma^(talk) 13:14, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
    - Cool. I restored the link to CIS Armed Forces, as it covers the army and the navy. Menkooroo (talk) 20:40, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments