- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Acid-beet
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:29, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:Some non-Hutt related food for a change.
(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
I'm supporting, but I don't think it needs to be said in the body that it is non-sentient, as it is a vegetable. 501st dogma(talk) 22:42, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Princess GLG 01:56, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
Commander Code-8 You lost the game! 11:30, June 25, 2013 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 20:19, June 26, 2013 (UTC)
Object
- 501st
I don't think its habitat can be specified as acid rain...- Is that better? Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:55, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Please read over your article before you nom it. I've been finding missing words here and there. 501st dogma(talk) 21:04, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
- My bad did you fix them I read through it a couple of times and can't see anything wrong now. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:55, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Princess
Can you not say that they are edible in the infobox?- Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:55, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
You say that they are non-sentient in the infobox but not in the body.- Oops swear I added that. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:55, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
You need a first appearance/first mentioned somewhere in the appearances/sources.- Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:55, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
In the sources it says that the entry in TCSWE is "Acid-beet" yet in the references it is "acid-beet". Is the entry capitalized or not?- Princess GLG 21:20, June 5, 2013 (UTC)- Corrected, it wasn't capitalized. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:55, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Exiled Jedi
You mention it as non-sentient in the infobox, but not in the body.--Exiled Jedi(Greetings) 00:16, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
- I did have it mentioned in the body but on several other plant CA noms I was asked to remove it as apparently it's not necessary for plants. Is there and official policy on this because I have several noms it effects. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:30, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the correct format is; the status articles I have checked have been somewhat inconsistent.
- I'll bring it up at the next mofference and see if I can get a consensus. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:13, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Ok removed non-sentient from the body and infobox as it was agreed at the mofference that being a edible vegtable is not enough to assume non-sentience. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:44, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
- I'll bring it up at the next mofference and see if I can get a consensus. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:13, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the correct format is; the status articles I have checked have been somewhat inconsistent.
- I did have it mentioned in the body but on several other plant CA noms I was asked to remove it as apparently it's not necessary for plants. Is there and official policy on this because I have several noms it effects. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:30, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
You cannot source the destruction of the diner to Dining at Dex's.--Exiled Jedi(Greetings) 23:39, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm odd I swear I sourced it to the Last of the Jedi in all the food CA's. Oh well corrected now. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:13, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
Don't forget to add Category:Species of undefined sentience.--Exiled Jedi(Greetings) 04:04, June 25, 2013 (UTC)
- Added to all relevant noms. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:11, June 25, 2013 (UTC)
Comments