Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/4-LOM's programmer

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 4-LOM's programmer
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 CC-8
        • 1.1.2.2 Manoof
        • 1.1.2.3 OOM
      • 1.1.3 Comments

4-LOM's programmer

  • Nominated by: Liverpool92Ackbar HS 12:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 00:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  3. Great job, thank the Maker! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  4. LucaRoR CIS roundel (Talk) 11:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
    Editoronthewiki (talk) 14:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  5. Alright, now I can vote on it :P Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  6. ECvote OOM 224 08:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Object

CC-8
  • Please bold change the bolding to the word individual and link Programmer
  • The date reference needs to say which events and source are being dated. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 02:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
      • I was meaning something more like this for the date. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 08:05, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
        • I don't see why when BMF states it as 9 BBY. There's also then no way to prove that it would takes place in exactly 9 BBY then if we don't use this way.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 10:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
          • So the Helmet Collection states directly that Powered Down Part II takes place in 9 BBY rather than the events? In that case the wording would need to be along the lines of "Helmet collection places Powered Down Part II, which includes 4-LOM's recollection of his programmer, in 9 BBY." Commander Code-8 Hello There! 10:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
            • Yes there is an image of it shared on discord Lewisr sent it. Fixed.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 11:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
              • Powered Down is not mentioned by name in that image, so the ref note still needs to be done like the first example I gave. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 06:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
                • It dates the whole run in with Han and Chewie too 9 BBY.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 03:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
                  • That doesn't change the need for an expanded ref note like I've been describing. If the Helmet Collection directly mentioned 4-LOM's programmer the note as currently written would probably be suitable, but since it doesn't it just needs a little extension to say something along the lines of "Star Wars Helmet Collection 78 places the events of "Powered Down, Part II," which include 4-LOM's recollection of his programmer, in 9 BBY." Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
                    • Lew sent me another screenshot of helmet collection that mentions the programmer. I'll dm it.-Liverpool92Ackbar HS 03:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Manoof
  • Can we add some context on why 4-LOM reminisced about his programmer - that the legend was true. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Added.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 21:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
OOM
  • 4-LOM's programming is quite relevant to this article. OOM 224 21:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
    • What exactly do you want me to say?--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 00:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
      • You'll want to detail some information about 4-LOM's programming here OOM 224 20:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
        • Added.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 00:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Similarly, I believe the fact that 4-LOM was originally assigned to a luxury liner, according to the droid's article, is relevant context here.
  • For some reason, the article's listed in a couple of droid categories. Not supposed to be there, I assume? OOM 224 16:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    • FIxed.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 01:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  • The type of context for Han (occupation) and Chewie (species) are different here, and it's best if they're standardised. Since the text here doesn't have much to do with people's species, I suggest that you go with context on their occupation OOM 224 14:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS 22:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 08:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)