Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/2nd Fleet

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

2nd Fleet

Nominated by: Vitus Infinitus^Talk 14:21, July 31, 2019 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Fleets fleets fleets that's what I like

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

Fan26 (Talk) 22:03, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
Zed42 (talk) 01:34, August 3, 2019 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 02:38, August 4, 2019 (UTC)
<-Omicron^{(Leave a message at the BEEP!)} 20:20, August 4, 2019 (UTC)
QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 12:08, August 5, 2019 (UTC)
Tommy Macaroni 19:10, August 6, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan

I think specifying that RotS "belonged to Fantasy Flight Games' Star Wars roleplaying series of products" is a bit unnecessary as it can be taken as a given that a SW sourcebook belongs to said roleplaying series. Fan26 (Talk) 19:19, August 1, 2019 (UTC)
- How is it now?--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:24, August 1, 2019 (UTC)

Zed

~~The founding date should be mentioned in the article since right now it's exclusive to the infobox.~~ Zed42 (talk) 08:27, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
- Done--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 13:23, August 2, 2019 (UTC)

Tommy

~~Does RotS use the wording "newly formed"? If so, it should be in the body. Besides, I think it's kinda unnecessary for a ref.~~
- Removed--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:26, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
~~Also, does it use "enormous"? If not, that doesn't seem very encyclopedic or objective.~~
- It uses the word, yes--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:26, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
~~Do we know who wrote the book?~~
- The term author isn't used from as far as I can see, only "Expansion Design and Development." The rest are editors, graphic designers, and coordinators of different areas. I've added the people under the ED&D section of the credits. The people there are RPG authors so I believe this is it.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:56, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
  - It's fine, that list's way too long for a BtS mention anyway. Tommy Macaroni 17:05, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
    - Should I remove it then?--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:23, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
      - Yes I think so. Tommy Macaroni 18:35, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
        Done--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:41, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
~~"when it blockaded the sector." Which fleet are you referring to here?~~ Tommy Macaroni 22:19, August 5, 2019 (UTC)
- Reworded paragraph--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:26, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
  - I've reworded it to make it flow better. Please make sure it's still all accurate. Tommy Macaroni 17:05, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
    - It looks good to me--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:23, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
~~Blockade of the Quellor sector also seems to have additional information on this subject, and context for the Quellor sector.~~ Tommy Macaroni 22:21, August 5, 2019 (UTC)
- Added context and all additional info--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:26, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
  - Okay. Kinda worrying this was missed the first time round. Are you sure the article is now complete? Tommy Macaroni 17:05, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
    - Yes I'm sure now that it's everything relevant.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:23, August 6, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Okay, so Rise of the Separatists is meant to cover the first half of the war, ending its coverage with the Confederate–Republic peace initiative, which was in 21 BBY. So shouldn’t it say that it was founded between 22 BBY and 21 BBY instead? However, you could maybe argue that, since it isn’t outright stated, the book could have just been talking about a latter event.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:46, August 7, 2019 (UTC)

I think that's a bit ungrounded. Tommy Macaroni 19:24, August 7, 2019 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 19:24, August 7, 2019 (UTC)