- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
2-237-93
- Nominated by: Stake black msg 13:32, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
501st dogma(talk) 20:19, May 24, 2013 (UTC)- - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 19:57, May 25, 2013 (UTC) - Fe Nite (talk) 01:15, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:08, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
Object
- 501st
Can you tell us what the image is in the infobox? Its not really clear what a random lizard-thing has to do with it....501st dogma(talk) 20:34, May 23, 2013 (UTC)- How's that? Stake black msg 01:28, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- Now I know you have made a boat load of M&A status articles…and most of them have the same BTS…however, despite this is it ok to have Lucasfilm in the article just by itself or should it be Lucasfilm Ltd. or Lucasfilm Limited? Fe Nite (talk) 01:45, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
- It's certainly not incorrect to use "Lucasfilm" in prose. Stake black msg 17:57, May 25, 2013 (UTC)