[17:00] <Grunny> Okay, let's go
[17:01] <Grunny> Welcome to meeting 13 :P
<GrandMoffTranner> Hi, everyone!
<Grunny> First up probed articles from last meeting
<Grunny> http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Gherant&diff=2736502&oldid=2708859
<Grunny> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Gherant
<ChackJadson> keep on the first, I s'pose
<GrandMoffTranner> Keep.
<Grunny> Tope took the time to update :P
<Toprawa> Fixed it on Friday
<CC7567> Keep.
<Toprawa> Keep
<Grunny> Keepers
<Jujiggum> keep
<Grunny> Kept
<Grunny> Next:
[17:02] <Grunny> http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Nazzar&diff=2728180&oldid=2708880
<Grunny> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Nazzar
<Grunny> SavageBob updated it
<ChackJadson> keep, then
<GrandMoffTranner> Keep
<Jujiggum> Keep
<Toprawa> Keep
<Grunny> Kept
<Grunny> Now for new victims:
<Grunny> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Being_Boba_Fett
<Grunny> "Being Boba Fett - We just got done looking at this thing last meeting, but someone else placed an "Update" tag on it. I don't know what that's supposed to mean, but it needs to be figured out. Also, it's categorized as Tales stories with canon elements, but the article does not seem to support this. Again, needs to be figured out. "
[17:03] <Grunny> MJ had a crack
<Grunny> "After further checking, both the original author and the user who handled the objections in the last review have since been permabanned, so I went ahead and updated it myself. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers)19:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC) "
<ChackJadson> yeah, keep, I guess
<GrandMoffTranner> Keep.
<Grunny> Keep
<Jujiggum> keep
<CC7567> Keep
<Toprawa> yeah, I think he fixed all of my concerns
<Toprawa> Keep
<Grunny> Kept
<Grunny> Next up an early GA:
<Grunny> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sev_Buzk
<GrandMoffTranner> Probe.
[17:04] <Grunny> "Sev Buzk - Inclusion in CSWE requires full sourcing throughout. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC) "
<CC7567> Please probe...
<Jujiggum> probe
<ChackJadson> probe
<Grunny> Probe
<Toprawa> Probe
<GrandMoffTranner> If need be, I could handle it.
<Grunny> It has far more problems than just sourcing
<Grunny> It needs a rewrite
<ChackJadson> I love the P&T quote
<Toprawa> I agree with Grunny
<CC7567> Image placement is horrible as well.
<CC7567> Yeah, per Grunny.
<Grunny> Probed mercilessly
<Jujiggum> yeah
[17:05] <Grunny> Last up:
<Grunny> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gank
<GrandMoffTranner> No BTS. Probe.
<Grunny> "Gank - No Bts and an unsourced infobox item. Also, with so many sources are there any quotes available? Grunny (Talk) 08:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC) "
<Grunny> Probe
<Jujiggum> Probe
<CC7567> Probify.
<ChackJadson> probe, could be better
<Toprawa> There's more work that needs to be done besides the BTS, I figure
<Toprawa> but probe on that alone
<GrandMoffTranner> Yeah, that too.
<Grunny> Probed
<Grunny> Well articles are done
[17:06] <Grunny> Onto discussion items
<ChackJadson> Toprawaius?
<Grunny> "Organizing "Unidentified" character articles on the GA page. "
<Toprawa> Right, ok
<Toprawa> I mayhave spoken to this out loud in front of some of you
<GrandMoffTranner> Yes.
<Toprawa> I would just for us to create some kind of special organization designation for Unidentified character articles on the GA age
<Toprawa> page*
<Toprawa> I don't believe listing them under "U" is necessarily accurate
<CC7567> Maybe by the second word, not the "unidentified"?
[17:07] <GrandMoffTranner> If I may repeat my proposal from a while ago?
<Toprawa> Please do
[17:08] <GrandMoffTranner> I think we should have them organized under a separate "Unidentified" header, then alphabetized by the next relevant word. So, "Unidentified Sith (Sacking of Coruscant)" would be alphabetized under "S."
<Jujiggum> sounds good to me
<CC7567> Hmm.
<ChackJadson> like CC said, basically?
<ChackJadson> oh wait
<ChackJadson> nvm
<Toprawa> One question for Tranner
<GrandMoffTranner> Yes? I think I know what you'll ask.
<Toprawa> I envision we would list this heading after "Z" in the Characters section
<Toprawa> Am I understanding this correctl?
[17:09] <Toprawa> y
<GrandMoffTranner> Yes.
<CC7567> Sounds good to me.
<Toprawa> Yes, I like that
<GrandMoffTranner> Each section would have a separate subsection as needed.
<ChackJadson> me too
<Jujiggum> Sounds good
<ChackJadson> I support
<Toprawa> Well, wait
<Toprawa> Let me ask another one then
<CC7567> Although...I'm not sure if we want to further subdivide that
<ChackJadson> per CC
<Toprawa> Yes, per CC
<Jujiggum> per CC
<Grunny> Indeed
<Toprawa> I think we should just have one main "Unidentified" section and list from there
<GrandMoffTranner> Sounds fine with me.
<CC7567> The text would get rather minuscule. :P
<CC7567> Per Tope.
<Toprawa> exactly
[17:10] <Jujiggum> Per Tope
<GrandMoffTranner> I actually meant to say that. :p
<ChackJadson> wait
<ChackJadson> after Z, or a whole other section?
<Toprawa> after Z but still under Characters
<ChackJadson> ok
<GrandMoffTranner> Yes.
<ChackJadson> yeah, works for me
<Grunny> Yep, I like it
<Toprawa> Cool
[17:11] <ChackJadson> is that everything?
<GrandMoffTranner> I believe so.
<Grunny> Unless anyone else has anything to discuss?
<Grunny> Then we're all done
<ChackJadson> cool
<Grunny> Meeting adjourned