Pultimo

Things to do

  • Recently underwent a pretty sizable expansion for, what, an update? I'm not sure what the point of this edit was exactly. But it should be examined for accuracy and whether it's actually necessary. Worse, it introduced quite a few referencing issues, such as intro referencing and page-number citations, which are now restricted by policy; and I really don't know why so many of these claims require double reference notes. Some of them actually have three and four ref notes. Why is this necessary? Ultimately, this needs a major cleanup now.
  • BTS is unsourced. Publication date for first mention would be nice.
  • I'm not sure the rest of the BTS is really necessary; certainly the last sentence isn't.

Removal of GA status

Comments