[16:04] Jujiggum lol Okay, first off, let's take care of TOR [16:04] Jang|Away I'm ready to go :P [16:04] Jang|Away haha [16:05] Jujiggum The Senate Session one with way too long of a name for me to post here: [16:05] Jujiggum Seems to be keepable to me per Trayus' post [16:05] Jujiggum Per my notes in the edit summaries one these, the Senate session had no new information. I threw the tag on there when the Journal of Gnost-Dural came out because it was pictured, but there was no new information. I'd forgotten that I left the update tag on there, so it looked like there was still stuff that needed to be added, but it wasn't anything specifically new. So that one's good now. [16:05] Jujiggum Er... that^ was meant to be in quotes. Trayus said that [16:05] Toprawa Keep [16:06] Jujiggum Keep [16:06] CavalierOne keep [16:06] Cal_Jedi Keep [16:06] Jang|Away Yeah keep [16:06] Jujiggum Okay, Session kept [16:06] Jujiggum Now, the Treaty [16:06] Jujiggum Trayus said we can just outright kill [16:06] Jujiggum And I'm good with that [16:06] CavalierOne Kill per Trayus [16:06] Toprawa Kill [16:06] Jang|Away True, kill [16:06] Cal_Jedi Kill [16:06] Jujiggum Alright, Treaty killed [16:07] Jujiggum Moving on... to the Maintenance Page! [16:07] Jujiggum http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vindican?t=20120701230056 [16:07] Jujiggum Update tag [16:07] Toprawa Wait. [16:07] Jujiggum Waiting [16:07] Toprawa oh, nvm [16:07] Toprawa go ahead [16:07] Jujiggum Okay [16:07] Jang|Away Just to let you know, Trayus and I discussed Vindican. He said he could take care of him. :P [16:07] Jujiggum Okay [16:07] Jang|Away It's only a brief mention iirc [16:07] Jujiggum So no probe for now [16:07] Jujiggum ? [16:08] CavalierOne I'm good with that [16:08] Jang|Away Sure, that's fine with me [16:08] Toprawa sure [16:08] Cal_Jedi yup [16:08] Jujiggum Cool. Vindician spared for now [16:08] Jujiggum Anybody have anything else? [16:08] Cal_Jedi XD [16:08] CavalierOne Nope. [16:08] Jang|Away Track 30 :DD [16:08] Toprawa Just a discussion item [16:08] Cal_Jedi Quickest meeting for the win. :P [16:08] Jujiggum LOL [16:08] Jujiggum Discussion! [16:08] Jujiggum From Meeting 47: the possibility of adding to the Bylaws a section about how many votes (or members) are needed at AC meetings will be discussed [16:08] Cal_Jedi Yes [16:08] Toprawa Ok, if I may... [16:09] Jujiggum You have the floor, Tope [16:09] Toprawa Thank you [16:09] Toprawa This came up two meetings ago, I believe it was, when it looked like no one was going to show up, and there were only two people here or something and there was some confusion over whether they could legitimately hold a meeting. [16:09] CavalierOne Aye [16:09] Jang|Away Yeah I remember [16:09] Toprawa Very simply, I offer the following proposal: [16:09] CavalierOne There wre no proxy votes, either [16:10] Toprawa a) As long as one person is present on IRC, a meeting can be held with only that individual and proxy votes [16:10] Toprawa It is recommended, however, that you invite a responsible non-AC member to witness the meeting for honesty's sake. [16:10] Toprawa I almost did this once with GT. [16:10] Toprawa Then another AC showed up at the last second [16:11] Jujiggum That sounds good to me [16:11] Cal_Jedi We should add a blurb, though, on how /many/ votes are needed. [16:11] Jang|Away What if there's no proxy votes? Do we just go by the only present AC? [16:11] Toprawa b) Between present members on IRC and absentee votes, there should be at least three participating members. [16:11] Cal_Jedi I believe we've done three in the past, right? [16:11] Cal_Jedi ok good [16:11] Jujiggum That works for me too [16:11] Toprawa If there aren't three members providing input, the meeting should be postponed until a later date. [16:12] Toprawa That's about it. [16:12] Jujiggum Cool [16:12] Toprawa Any other suggestions are welcome [16:12] Jujiggum Anybody have more suggestions? [16:12] Cal_Jedi All sounds good. That's what I had in mind, too. So, sounds excellent... :P [16:12] CavalierOne I think that covers everything [16:12] Jang|Away That does sound good, Tope. [16:12] Jujiggum Alright [16:12] Toprawa Cool [16:12] Jang|Away I was just confused but then nps after a second thought :P [16:12] Jujiggum So all three parts to that are passed [16:12] Toprawa Oh, also [16:13] Cal_Jedi And added into the Bylaws, correct? [16:13] Toprawa And to add this to the Bylaws page, in case that wasn't clear [16:13] Toprawa yes :P [16:13] Jujiggum Correct [16:13] Cal_Jedi good. :P [16:13] Jang|Away Sounds good :P [16:13] CavalierOne Indeed [16:13] Jujiggum Okay, anything else from anyone? [16:14] Jang|Away I'm all good :P [16:14] Toprawa Just meeting duties [16:14] Toprawa http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/AC_Bylaws [16:14] Cal_Jedi and I hope someone logged this? [16:14] Jujiggum Alright [16:14] Toprawa We actually need to update this. [16:14] Toprawa Xd is scheduling next meeting. [16:14] Toprawa Tranner was on paperwork..but he died. :P [16:14] Jang|Away D: [16:14] Cal_Jedi :( [16:14] Toprawa Any objections to just moving ahead to Floyd, who is next in line? [16:14] Jujiggum Hah yeah I just saw that [16:14] CavalierOne :( [16:15] Jujiggum No objections [16:15] CavalierOne Not at all [16:15] Jang|Away We need to introduce Weatherscan to Tranner :P [16:15] Cal_Jedi Sure. sounds fine. [16:15] Toprawa Ok, I'll update that chart [16:15] CavalierOne Floyd may objectm but here's not here [16:15] Jujiggum Jang - indeed [16:15] Toprawa right :P [16:15] Jujiggum Cool [16:15] Jujiggum Okay [16:15] Jang|Away and then CT, who is missing :P [16:15] Jujiggum Meeting 48 is hereby adjourned!