[08/25/12 23:01:42] <@ecks> Welcome to meeting 49!
[08/25/12 23:01:45] <@Cal_Jedi_> :D
[08/25/12 23:01:48] <@ecks> It will be so fun!!1!
[08/25/12 23:01:48] <@Cal_Jedi_> Countdown until Cal loses connection again. :P
[08/25/12 23:01:52] <@Cal_Jedi_> hhahaahhahhahaha
[08/25/12 23:02:02] <@Jangston> YEE
[08/25/12 23:02:02] <@ecks> Apparently there is nothing from last time.
[08/25/12 23:02:08] <@Cal_Jedi_> :D
[08/25/12 23:02:10] <@ecks> So we'll just start with new stuff
[08/25/12 23:02:12] <@ecks> !!1!
[08/25/12 23:02:12] <@Cal_Jedi_> See ya, everyone
[08/25/12 23:02:14] <@Cal_Jedi_> :P
[08/25/12 23:02:19] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gank
[08/25/12 23:02:25] <@ecks> Gank—"mysterious," "very little known," and other OOU perspective stuff that needs to get axed.
[08/25/12 23:02:25] <@ecks> I don't own the sources but isn't it possible those are actually officially stated by the sources, in which case there is no violation of WP:MOS? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:38, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:02:25] <@ecks> Considering the article was written in 2007, when this type of thing was especially rampant, I would say it's a likely violation. Either way, someone should go through the source to confirm. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:43, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:02:29] -!- Cal_Jedi (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/Cal-Jedi) has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
[08/25/12 23:02:33] <@Jangston> Bye Cal
[08/25/12 23:02:35] * Cal_Jedi_ is now known as Cal_Jedi
[08/25/12 23:02:39] <@Jangston> Hi Cal
[08/25/12 23:02:41] <@Cal_Jedi> YAY
[08/25/12 23:02:44] <@Cal_Jedi> :D
[08/25/12 23:02:57] <@Jangston> heh Hanzo
[08/25/12 23:03:03] <@ecks> PROBE
[08/25/12 23:03:05] <@Toprawa> I think the issues with this article run a lot deeper than a few "unknowns" here and there.
[08/25/12 23:03:17] <@Toprawa> I think the entire article's wording is subpar.
[08/25/12 23:03:28] <@ecks> yeah
[08/25/12 23:03:42] <@Cal_Jedi> Yeah. There are details that may have passed by others, but bug me, so I'm not liking it. :P
[08/25/12 23:03:58] <@Jangston> "Some Ganks spoke Galactic Basic Standard.[5]" totally worth a new paragraph :P
[08/25/12 23:03:59] <@Toprawa> I am totally serious when I say, like, total rewrite.
[08/25/12 23:03:59] <@Toprawa> This article is a nice example of 2007-era detail standards
[08/25/12 23:04:11] <@Toprawa> Look at all of our modern alien species articles, and they're pretty much masterpieces
[08/25/12 23:04:15] <@Toprawa> This doesn't even come close
[08/25/12 23:04:33] <@Cal_Jedi> Jang: XD
[08/25/12 23:04:42] <@ecks> My vote is probe
[08/25/12 23:04:44] <@Jangston> The article. It's too damn. Choppy.
[08/25/12 23:04:44] <@Cal_Jedi> There are multiple ones like that, Jang, too.
[08/25/12 23:04:46] <@Xd1358> so is mine!
[08/25/12 23:04:48] <@Toprawa> Probe
[08/25/12 23:04:50] <@Jangston> Probe
[08/25/12 23:04:53] <@Cal_Jedi> Yes, indeed. Probe
[08/25/12 23:04:55] <@CavalierOne> Probe
[08/25/12 23:05:05] <@ecks> Gank probed.
[08/25/12 23:05:21] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Unidentified_Keshiri_bartender
[08/25/12 23:05:27] <@ecks> Unidentified Keshiri bartender—bad formatting from recent additions, needs to use {{Cite web}}, and requires sourcing throughout.
[08/25/12 23:05:51] <@Cal_Jedi> It should only need the one source, though, correct?
[08/25/12 23:05:55] <@Jangston> The sourcing I could see because of the ref & notes section
[08/25/12 23:05:56] <@ecks> If there's a reference for something, there needs to be a reference for everything.
[08/25/12 23:06:04] <@Jangston> otherwise wouldn't it be just self sourcing due to 1 source?
[08/25/12 23:06:05] <@Toprawa> per ecks
[08/25/12 23:06:06] <@Cal_Jedi> So, it, in theory, shouldn't be hard to source, correct?
[08/25/12 23:06:15] <@CavalierOne> In theory
[08/25/12 23:06:21] <@Cal_Jedi> right, I just meant that it wouldn't be too hard to do, it would seem.
[08/25/12 23:06:30] <@Toprawa> It should be very easy, but the original author is no longer active
[08/25/12 23:06:36] <@Toprawa> Unless someone volunteers to adopt it, it will die
[08/25/12 23:06:47] <@Jangston> JJM man :P
[08/25/12 23:06:51] <@CavalierOne> Floyd!
[08/25/12 23:06:54] <@ecks> Unless someone wants to check it out, probe.
[08/25/12 23:06:55] <@CavalierOne> Adopt it!
[08/25/12 23:07:06] <@CavalierOne> Lost Tribe!
[08/25/12 23:07:16] <@Cal_Jedi> Yeah, it is Lost Tribe. All in favor of Floyd doing it. :P
[08/25/12 23:07:21] * @ecks [Redacted by administration]
[08/25/12 23:07:29] <@Jangston> Give it to Floyd
[08/25/12 23:07:38] <@Cal_Jedi> If he doesn't answer, then probe
[08/25/12 23:07:40] <@IFYLOFD> Blargle
[08/25/12 23:07:44] <@IFYLOFD> Probe that shit
[08/25/12 23:07:45] <@Jangston> [Redacted by administration]
[08/25/12 23:07:59] <@ecks> [Redacted by administration]
[08/25/12 23:08:04] <@Cal_Jedi> [Redacted by administration]
[08/25/12 23:08:10] <@ecks> Anyway, probe
[08/25/12 23:08:12] <@Toprawa> Probe
[08/25/12 23:08:15] <@Jangston> yeah probe
[08/25/12 23:08:19] <@Cal_Jedi> yes
[08/25/12 23:08:25] <@CavalierOne> Probe then
[08/25/12 23:08:36] <@ecks> Bartender probed.
[08/25/12 23:08:44] <@ecks> Alright, that's the agenda... HOWEVER
[08/25/12 23:08:49] <@Cal_Jedi> D:
[08/25/12 23:08:56] <@Cal_Jedi> However's always stick you.
[08/25/12 23:09:03] <@ecks> I thought we needed some sort of consensus to strike agenda items
[08/25/12 23:09:10] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Wookieepedia%3AAC%2FMeeting_49&diff=4142388&oldid=4142284
[08/25/12 23:09:19] <@ecks> And CC has struck this, for example, by himself
[08/25/12 23:09:26] <@ecks> I'm not sure if there was some consensus to strike it
[08/25/12 23:09:29] <@Cal_Jedi> IIRC, isn't it like 2 AC's have to agree to do it or something, an it can be done via IRC?
[08/25/12 23:09:36] <@Toprawa> We do, but it gets ignored
[08/25/12 23:09:40] <@Jangston> He struck the objection then ran for Pennsylvania
[08/25/12 23:09:44] <@ecks> "The AC has decided that a minimum consensus of at least four AC members present on IRC is needed to remove from an AC meeting page an article nominated for review for a future meeting in the instances that others have satisfactorily handled the objections to that article prior to the meeting. Consensus can also be reached on the meeting page itself; see the instructions page for details. This is done in an effort to
[08/25/12 23:09:45] <@ecks> eliminate any unnecessary time spent looking at articles during meetings. "
[08/25/12 23:09:46] <@Toprawa> There wasn't
[08/25/12 23:09:46] <@Toprawa> People think they can just remove their own additions
[08/25/12 23:09:54] <@ecks> §1 of the AgriCorps law.
[08/25/12 23:10:13] <@Jangston> I just leave it alone :P
[08/25/12 23:10:38] <@Jangston> if someone takes care one of my agenda items
[08/25/12 23:10:53] <@ecks> Hmm
[08/25/12 23:10:59] <@Cal_Jedi> So, um, yeah.
[08/25/12 23:11:13] <@ecks> Looks like CC just struck them all.
[08/25/12 23:11:30] <@Toprawa> This voting method becomes burdensome when articles are listed on the agenda with minor little fixes
[08/25/12 23:11:30] <@Toprawa> But I think the point should be don't burden the agenda with minor little fixes
[08/25/12 23:11:30] <@Toprawa> Talk pages work just as efficiently
[08/25/12 23:11:41] <@Toprawa> We can certainly go through them if you feel like it, ecks
[08/25/12 23:11:46] <@Toprawa> Otherwise, I don't care, personally :P
[08/25/12 23:11:54] <@ecks> They're not that many, so let's do it for the sake of bureaucracy.
[08/25/12 23:11:54] <@Jangston> Maybe CC is making it easier for us :P
[08/25/12 23:12:10] <@ecks> Swilla Corey—"unfortunately," as well as lack of adherence to WP:DASH. CC7567 (talk) 07:16, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:12:10] <@ecks> Fixed that "unfortunately" part, not the other one though. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:08, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:12:15] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Swilla_Corey
[08/25/12 23:12:33] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Swilla_Corey&diff=4138749&oldid=4013827
[08/25/12 23:12:37] <@ecks> There's still some dash issues here.
[08/25/12 23:13:08] <@Jangston> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Swilla_Corey?diff=4138749&oldid=4013827
[08/25/12 23:13:11] <@Jangston> i dont even
[08/25/12 23:13:46] <@ecks> I only spot one dash issue
[08/25/12 23:14:12] <@Jangston> Though she was never financially secure, Corey was satisfied with just reveling in her freedom–a stark contrast from her upbringing in slavery.
[08/25/12 23:14:26] <@ecks> I fixed that one.
[08/25/12 23:14:30] <@ecks> So it should be all good now.
[08/25/12 23:15:07] <@ecks> Spare?
[08/25/12 23:15:20] -!- Cal_Jedi (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/Cal-Jedi) has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
[08/25/12 23:15:43] <@Toprawa> Spare
[08/25/12 23:15:44] -!- Cal_Jedi (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/Cal-Jedi) has joined #wookieepedia-agricorps
[08/25/12 23:15:46] * ChanServ sets modes [#wookieepedia-agricorps +o Cal_Jedi]
[08/25/12 23:15:50] <@CavalierOne> Spare
[08/25/12 23:15:54] <@Jangston> Sparee
[08/25/12 23:16:07] <@Cal_Jedi> Spare (what?)
[08/25/12 23:16:10] <@ecks> Swilla spared
[08/25/12 23:16:16] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vindican
[08/25/12 23:16:20] <@Jangston> :D
[08/25/12 23:16:21] <@ecks> Vindican—TOR update tag.
[08/25/12 23:16:22] <@ecks> I am waiting for Trayus's update. I wish I had TOR. JangFett (Talk) 19:26, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:16:22] <@ecks> Lol totally forgot about this. I'll take care of it tonight for you. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 19:33, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:16:22] <@ecks> Mkay, taken care of. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 16:40, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:16:24] <@ecks> Spare.
[08/25/12 23:16:35] <@Jangston> Trayus took care of it. Many months later :P
[08/25/12 23:16:40] <@Cal_Jedi> :P
[08/25/12 23:16:42] <@Cal_Jedi> Spare
[08/25/12 23:16:44] <@Jangston> I wish I had TOR to help out :P
[08/25/12 23:16:46] <@Jangston> Spare
[08/25/12 23:17:04] <@Toprawa> Spare
[08/25/12 23:17:10] <@CavalierOne> Spare
[08/25/12 23:17:22] <@ecks> Vindican spared.
[08/25/12 23:17:25] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wyrpuuk_Cha
[08/25/12 23:17:31] <@ecks> Wyrpuuk Cha—requires sourcing throughout due to more than one source/appearance. CC7567 (talk) 07:19, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:17:31] <@ecks> Very easy fix. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:08, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
[08/25/12 23:17:33] <@Toprawa> Spare
[08/25/12 23:17:39] <@Cal_Jedi> Spare
[08/25/12 23:17:40] <@ecks> Spare
[08/25/12 23:17:41] <@Jangston> Spare
[08/25/12 23:17:43] <@CavalierOne> Spare
[08/25/12 23:17:51] <@ecks> Cha spared.
[08/25/12 23:18:05] <@ecks> Then some maintenance page fun
[08/25/12 23:18:16] <@CavalierOne> I have one issue to raise also.
[08/25/12 23:18:16] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Ragnos_Lakes
[08/25/12 23:18:18] <@ecks> Update tag
[08/25/12 23:18:28] <@Toprawa> The book has been out a month as of yesterday
[08/25/12 23:18:32] <@Jangston> More JJM
[08/25/12 23:18:42] <@ecks> Perfect. Let's probe
[08/25/12 23:18:45] <@Toprawa> Probe
[08/25/12 23:18:48] <@CavalierOne> Probe
[08/25/12 23:18:51] <@Jangston> Probe
[08/25/12 23:19:13] <@Cal_Jedi> Probe
[08/25/12 23:19:18] <@ecks> Ragnor Lakes probed.
[08/25/12 23:19:24] <@ecks> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Takara_Mountains
[08/25/12 23:19:26] <@ecks> Update tag
[08/25/12 23:19:32] <@Toprawa> Same book
[08/25/12 23:19:34] <@Toprawa> probe
[08/25/12 23:19:37] <@ecks> Probe
[08/25/12 23:19:41] <@Jangston> Jugs D:
[08/25/12 23:19:42] <@Jangston> Probe
[08/25/12 23:19:43] <@Cal_Jedi> Probe
[08/25/12 23:19:47] <@CavalierOne> Probe
[08/25/12 23:19:58] <@ecks> Takara Mountains probed
[08/25/12 23:20:26] <@ecks> That seems to be all, then.
[08/25/12 23:20:30] <@ecks> Cav, you had something?
[08/25/12 23:20:33] <@Jangston> TIme to party
[08/25/12 23:20:34] <@Jangston> Oh
[08/25/12 23:20:35] <@CavalierOne> Indeed.
[08/25/12 23:20:44] <@CavalierOne> A little spoilerly for Mercy Kill, however.
[08/25/12 23:21:03] <@Toprawa> I'll forget whatever you reveal here long before I ever read that :P
[08/25/12 23:21:09] <@Cal_Jedi> I don't mind spoilers from that book, if that's what you're waiting for. :P
[08/25/12 23:21:21] <@Jangston> I read 2 pages of it :P
[08/25/12 23:21:23] <@CavalierOne> I'll try and be non-spoilerly as much as possible :P
[08/25/12 23:21:30] <@CavalierOne> Basically: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Zilaash_Kuh
[08/25/12 23:21:36] <@Toprawa> guh
[08/25/12 23:21:44] <@CavalierOne> The character is revealed to be the alias of another character from MK.
[08/25/12 23:21:58] <@CavalierOne> The info needs to be merged, yadda, yadda, yadda.
[08/25/12 23:22:00] <@CavalierOne> BUT
[08/25/12 23:22:41] <@CavalierOne> Since the article as-is is no longer current, then we either need to propbe pending a merge and review, or strip it now and let it be renommed.
[08/25/12 23:22:57] <@CavalierOne> Since any merge will require us to take the links out of the random, etc pages.
[08/25/12 23:23:10] -Dave2/Wallops- Today a great pioneer, explorer and man passed away: Neil Alden Armstrong, the first man on the moon, died at the age of 82. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/25/us-usa-neilarmstrong-idUSBRE87O0B020120825
[08/25/12 23:23:19] <@CavalierOne> Thoughty
[08/25/12 23:23:23] <@CavalierOne> Thoughts*
[08/25/12 23:23:32] <@Toprawa> I think it's fair to point out that there is, historically speaking, dissenting opinion among the community as to whether to allow alias articles like this or not.
[08/25/12 23:23:33] <@ecks> In other news, freenode just told me Neil Armstrong has died.
[08/25/12 23:23:39] <@ecks> (go on, don't mind me)
[08/25/12 23:23:43] <@Toprawa> Personally, I'm totally in favor of merging this into Jesmin
[08/25/12 23:23:54] <@Toprawa> And there's nothing from stopping anyone from being WP:BOLD and doing so
[08/25/12 23:23:58] <@CavalierOne> Oh, I agree,
[08/25/12 23:24:06] <@Toprawa> but this might go beyond our jurisdiction to some degree
[08/25/12 23:24:12] <@CavalierOne> But merging it will not make Jesmin a good article
[08/25/12 23:24:26] <@CavalierOne> So it should be stripped, or at least probed.
[08/25/12 23:24:28] <@ecks> Didn't we have a case like this with the Inq?
[08/25/12 23:24:37] <@ecks> With Shan and the unidentified Jedi Knight?
[08/25/12 23:24:55] <@ecks> We just killed off the unidentified JK right away since it was going to be merged with Shan
[08/25/12 23:24:56] <@Toprawa> Cav, my concern is that I don't know if we legitimately have the authority to force a merge. What are you suggesting, exactly?
[08/25/12 23:25:10] <@CavalierOne> Well, it needs to be merged, no question.
[08/25/12 23:25:18] <@CavalierOne> Kuh is Jesmin.
[08/25/12 23:25:45] <@CavalierOne> But the GA status can't transfer over to Jesmin once the merge is complete.
[08/25/12 23:25:47] <@ecks> Meh, IMO we should just kill off the status.
[08/25/12 23:25:54] <@Toprawa> True
[08/25/12 23:25:57] <@Cal_Jedi> indeed.
[08/25/12 23:25:58] <@ecks> It's going to be a completely different article after the merge.
[08/25/12 23:26:02] <@CavalierOne> Indeed.
[08/25/12 23:26:04] <@Jangston> yeah simpler :P
[08/25/12 23:26:10] <@CavalierOne> So we either need to probe or kill now.
[08/25/12 23:26:15] <@ecks> !insta-kill
[08/25/12 23:26:17] <@Jangston> Kill for me
[08/25/12 23:26:23] <@Toprawa> Wait a minute
[08/25/12 23:26:49] <@Toprawa> What I'm saying is, though, that if someone chooses to update this article to specify that this character is Jesmin, I don't think we can force the article to be merged into the actual Jesmin article
[08/25/12 23:26:57] <@Jangston> if we probe, someone needs to check the merged info right? Since it has the status. Are you moving the GA article to JesmiN?
[08/25/12 23:27:07] <@Toprawa> If someone wanted the article to remain a separate GA as an alias article, I think they have that right in the absence of policy
[08/25/12 23:27:43] <@Jangston> I was thinking about moving Jesmin information to the GA article
[08/25/12 23:27:56] <@ecks> Which one is the "real name"?
[08/25/12 23:28:01] <@Toprawa> Example: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Arica
[08/25/12 23:28:03] <@CavalierOne> Really, Kuh should be moved to Jesmin.
[08/25/12 23:28:12] <@Toprawa> If someone wanted to GA Arica, we couldn't deny them that.
[08/25/12 23:28:19] <@Cal_Jedi> Yeah. We could, in fact, "rename" this as Jesmin, and let it keep its status provided that all proper information is transferred.
[08/25/12 23:28:35] <@CavalierOne> But, Jesmin is MAJOR character in MK.
[08/25/12 23:28:44] <@CavalierOne> The update would have to be pretty thorough.
[08/25/12 23:28:46] <@Toprawa> I agree Kuh should be merged to Jesmin, and someone has the right to do that
[08/25/12 23:28:48] <@Cal_Jedi> So, we would be keeping the Kuh article, and scrapping the Jesmin article, but keeping the name Jesmin and the status.
[08/25/12 23:28:51] <@ecks> All alias articles need to go away. :/
[08/25/12 23:28:55] <@Toprawa> But if someone protests that merge, it would end up in CT
[08/25/12 23:29:07] <@Cal_Jedi> Cav: Big character meaning like Featured lenght?
[08/25/12 23:29:10] <@Toprawa> I'm saying that the AC cannot formally require this article to be merged, only updated
[08/25/12 23:29:10] <@Cal_Jedi> *length
[08/25/12 23:29:15] <@CavalierOne> Cal - yep
[08/25/12 23:29:16] <@Jangston> Xd: [Redacted by administration]
[08/25/12 23:29:25] <@Cal_Jedi> [Redacted by administration]
[08/25/12 23:29:35] <@CavalierOne> Huh, someone already merged the info into Jesmin
[08/25/12 23:29:46] <@CavalierOne> Maxattac :s
[08/25/12 23:29:57] <@CavalierOne> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Jesmin_Tainer
[08/25/12 23:30:05] <@ecks> We can't just move over the status without reviewing it somehow, though.
[08/25/12 23:30:06] <@Cal_Jedi> So, apparently, the GA status is going either way. Whether it be through a crappy merge, or through a over-abundance of words.
[08/25/12 23:30:19] <@CavalierOne> I would see it that way.
[08/25/12 23:30:29] <@Jangston> Well I wouldn't give the GA status to the merged article :P
[08/25/12 23:30:58] <@Toprawa> I feel like I'm talking to a wall here.
[08/25/12 23:31:09] <@Jangston> sorry :P
[08/25/12 23:31:11] <@Toprawa> We cannot probe on the grounds of a required merge.
[08/25/12 23:31:22] <@Toprawa> We can probe on the grounds of needing an update with merged information.
[08/25/12 23:31:42] <@Toprawa> Merge means turning those two articles into one, single article
[08/25/12 23:32:06] <@Toprawa> We don't have the authority to require someone to do that to maintain GA status
[08/25/12 23:32:20] <@Toprawa> What we can do is require them to update the Kuh article
[08/25/12 23:32:40] <@Toprawa> if they wanted to merge it into a single article, it can still be probed, but on the grounds of going through a Redux type thing
[08/25/12 23:32:41] <@CavalierOne> Okay then - seeing as how you believe that the Kuh article could remain as an alias article - it needs updating for MK in any case sue to certain story factors.
[08/25/12 23:32:43] <@Cal_Jedi> You're saying keep both articles until said time that someone complains about it?
[08/25/12 23:32:58] <@Cal_Jedi> Basically?
[08/25/12 23:33:12] <@Jangston> yeah it has to be checked. I should've said that when I said "give the GA status to the merged article" :P
[08/25/12 23:33:18] <@Toprawa> Cav> Yes
[08/25/12 23:33:37] <@Toprawa> I'm not saying they should remain separate, but that no policy exists to require them to merge
[08/25/12 23:33:41] <@ecks> Basically, alias articles make things complicated. :(
[08/25/12 23:33:44] <@Toprawa> And thus we cannot enforce one
[08/25/12 23:34:10] <@CavalierOne> In that case, Kuh needs to be updated - independent of the merge issue - since the continuing identity of Kuh is a plot point in MK.
[08/25/12 23:34:23] <@CavalierOne> So I say probe on that issue in any case.
[08/25/12 23:34:45] <@Toprawa> I agree.
[08/25/12 23:34:53] <@Cal_Jedi> All right. Sounds good.
[08/25/12 23:35:09] <@Toprawa> This might all change when Jugs comes back and decides what he's going to do with it
[08/25/12 23:35:20] <@CavalierOne> And then we let Jugs sort it out when he comes back.
[08/25/12 23:35:28] <@Toprawa> Yeah
[08/25/12 23:35:50] <@Toprawa> We might ultimately end up coming up with an impromptu policy for this type of situation if he decides to merge
[08/25/12 23:36:05] <@Toprawa> i.e., in what form does the GA status transfer over
[08/25/12 23:36:23] <@Toprawa> We could go on about that, but I think we'd all rather not :P
[08/25/12 23:36:25] <@CavalierOne> Well, if updated correctly, I see no issue.
[08/25/12 23:36:33] <@CavalierOne> It would be the same as a regular update.
[08/25/12 23:36:34] <@ecks> Sooooo
[08/25/12 23:36:37] <@ecks> Probe?
[08/25/12 23:36:45] <@Toprawa> Probe for update from MK
[08/25/12 23:36:49] <@CavalierOne> Probe
[08/25/12 23:36:53] <@Jangston> probe
[08/25/12 23:37:22] <@Cal_Jedi> probe
[08/25/12 23:37:29] <@ecks> Probed.
[08/25/12 23:37:38] <@ecks> Anyone got something else?
[08/25/12 23:37:44] <@Jangston> Where is Tommy? :P
[08/25/12 23:37:46] <@CavalierOne> Nothing I can think of.
[08/25/12 23:37:53] <@Jangston> I haven't seen him a long time
[08/25/12 23:37:57] <@ecks> Any discussion items?
[08/25/12 23:37:58] <@Jangston> in a*
[08/25/12 23:38:10] <@CavalierOne> Unless we want to discuss new member potentials. We're getting a little light.
[08/25/12 23:38:14] -!- IFYLOFD (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/IFYLOFD) has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
[08/25/12 23:38:28] <@Toprawa> Anyone in mind?
[08/25/12 23:38:33] <@Jangston> Not at the moment. :P
[08/25/12 23:38:37] <@CavalierOne> None specifically.
[08/25/12 23:38:52] <@CavalierOne> I thought we might start thinking of candidates for discussion next meeting.
[08/25/12 23:39:01] <@Jangston> Yeah I'll be on the look out next time
[08/25/12 23:39:07] <@Toprawa> ok
[08/25/12 23:39:11] <@ecks> Sounds good.
[08/25/12 23:39:29] <@Jangston> I'm seeing more of the same users on the GAN nominating than reviewing
[08/25/12 23:39:36] <@Cal_Jedi> Indeed.
[08/25/12 23:39:41] <@Cal_Jedi> We need someone that can review, not nominate.
[08/25/12 23:39:46] <@CavalierOne> Yep.
[08/25/12 23:39:48] <@ecks> Let's make Xd1359.
[08/25/12 23:39:50] <@Cal_Jedi> We have tons of nominators, the GAN needs reviewers.
[08/25/12 23:39:52] <@ecks> Anyway, are we done?
[08/25/12 23:39:56] <@CavalierOne> And Cavalier Two
[08/25/12 23:39:59] <@Jangston> :D
[08/25/12 23:40:00] <@Toprawa> I need to go
[08/25/12 23:40:03] <@Toprawa> Nice meeting, everyone
[08/25/12 23:40:04] <@Jangston> Later Tope
[08/25/12 23:40:05] <@Toprawa> Peace
[08/25/12 23:40:07] <@CavalierOne> You planet needs you!
[08/25/12 23:40:14] <@Cal_Jedi> later.
[08/25/12 23:40:16] <@Jangston> White Castles will be in order :P
[08/25/12 23:40:17] <@Toprawa> It does. :P
[08/25/12 23:40:18] <@Jangston> next time
[08/25/12 23:40:21] <@Toprawa> goobah!
[08/25/12 23:40:24] -!- Toprawa (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/Toprawa) has quit (Quit: Is it the shoes?!)