Talk: Shockwave

welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Community Portal talk page or ask me on my Talk page. May the Force be with you! - QuentinGeorge 08:29, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Star Destroyers

  • Please don't unilaterally rename/move ship class articles. That's what the discussion page is for - you discuss why you think it should be moved, and others will put up their case. Your changes have thus been reverted. Please don't make such a unilateral move again. QuentinGeorge 08:29, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Here is the proof, this official site trumps all the current books.

http://www.starwars.com/databank/starship/superstardestroyer/index.html

  • The OS does not trump all current books. It is C-Canon, like all other EU sources. QuentinGeorge 08:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Its official.
      • In other words, all the above sources including the official website are official. I hope that ends this dispute. MyNz 08:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
        • Its Super Star Destroyer, this comes directly from George Lucas. I fixed the incorrect star dreadnought stuff and put the correct super star destroyer. one of the other people changed it.
          • The OS databank is not written by George Lucas. If you change these articles again, they will be reverted again. QuentinGeorge 08:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
          • I fixed it and yall want to stick with the FAN CREATED material. *rolls eyes* The official site is written by EMPLOYEES OF GEORGE LUCAS. Therefore as truthful as it gets.
            • The databank is EU. Yes, it is written by "employees of George Lucas" - but so is every other piece of EU. Additonally, this Wiki has a certain policy on "canon" and "official". This is not up for debate. Please read canon before making any "corrections" to articles. If you continue to argue this point, you will be given a 1 day ban to cool off - QuentinGeorge 08:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
            • Since when is ROTJ EU?
              • I never mentioned ROTJ. What are you talking about? QuentinGeorge 08:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
              • In return of the jedi while the Millenium Falcon is in the Death Star II Admiral Ackbar in the movie said "Concentrate all fight on that Super Star Destroyer."
                • If you read the actual article on Super Star Destroyer, you'd find your explanation. QuentinGeorge 08:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
                • It's not slang btw. that is what the ship is. - 09:00, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
                  • Ok, enough of this. You've got two choices. You either abide by our canon policy for articles, or you choose different articles to edit. It's up to you. This is not a discussion board. QuentinGeorge 09:00, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
                  • I did abide by the canon policy. not my problem that you can understand that.
                    • Do you want to be banned for a day or something? QuentinGeorge 09:03, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
                    • Who is the head administrator here? QuentinGeorge 09:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
                      • There is no head administrator. There are a number of administrators, however, but they will agree with me. QuentinGeorge 09:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
                        • Uh huh sure. tell the main guy to contact me or I can ask someone.
                        • Ok, you've tried my patience. Come back tomorrow. QuentinGeorge 09:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Banned

  • Congratulations, you've been banned for a day. In that time, I'd suggest you familiarise yourself with the canon page, the Manual of Style, the Code of Conduct, and the ongoing discussion on the Super Star Destroyer and SSD Continuity Issues pages. Remember, the Wiki model works by consensus politics, not loose cannons going off on their own. QuentinGeorge 09:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)