Talk: Remoh

Remoh, welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Community Portal talk page or ask me on my Talk page. May the Force be with you! - Sikon [Talk] 18:31, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

ideas for SS-bashing Flash movie

  • i am making a flash movie about the fictional (sadly) end of SuperShadow. i would like some ideas for the final draft of the movie.

Pit Droid award

Well, you are given that award by any user's decision. It's not something automatically given to you for reaching a certain goal. So, basically, if you see that someone has made frequent, highly quality edits to clean up and improve the technical aspects of many articles, you award them with the pit droid award for their work. For instance, I gave one to User:Riffsyphon1024 because he tirelessly categorixaes and clean up articles, and has since, basically this wiki was created. General Kenobi 08:33, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Heart of Darkness

I know this sounds stupid, but in this case, the Databank is wrong. The story that Yoda defeated a Dark Jedi from Bpfassh came from the Thrawn trilogy, which was released a few years before the prequels - at a time when the date of the Clone Wars had not been set. Therefore, Timothy Zahn placed it over a decade too early, meaning anything that was supposed to have happened in the Clone Wars now has the wrong date. The New Essential Chronology, the most up-to-date and official source we have, states this event happened during the Clone Wars. The Official Site, however, last updated the Yoda page prior to the release of the New Chronology, when no further info on this matter was available. Therefore, it did not alter the info it had on the page, merely adding new sections about the Clone Wars. Yes, it's in Yoda's past, but since the Databank also mentions some of Yoda's exploits after the Clone Wars, from the point-of-view of the author, the Clone Wars are in the past, even though it's not explicitly stated. Regardless, that article is now out-of-date, and the New Chronology includes the definitive version of events. Tales stories are mainly non-canon, and since Heart of Darkness has been trumped by an official source - regardless of what the Databank says - it is non-canon. Please drop the issue - Kwenn 11:11, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Interfering with vfd

Do not interfere with votes for deletion, as you just did with 21,183 BBY. Wait for the vote to conclude. — Silly Dan 01:51, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Cortosis/Purge

First of all, no page here, except your User page, is your page pal. Secondly, no where on that page does it say that both users must have a lightsaber. Both parties don't need a lightsaber to have a lightsaber battle. Thirdly, why else would someone have a cortosis blade other than to fight someone with a lightsaber? And Fourthly, I wasn't aware that Purge was a tie-in story. The Darkhorse.Com page for it states it is a one shot. In other words, a comic book which isn't a part of a series. I didn't see a more appropriate category so I put it there. If you are going to wet your pants over it then remove it from the page and go on with your life.--DannyBoy7783 01:55, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I don't care what your problem with DannyBoy is...

... but don't vandalize his user page, unless you want to be banned. — Silly Dan 01:59, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • i was gonna change it back!- remoh
    • ****ing with one's user page is not something to be taken lightly. You'd be wise to cut the kiddie crap. --AdmThrawn 02:16, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • I say ban him. But then again, I'm a tad biased now.--DannyBoy7783 02:17, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

okay! i'll stop!-user:remoh

  • Don't remove content from my talk page. And don't bother denying it buddy. The history page knows all. I'm referring to the section you created and then deleted called "typical". I added it to my archive section. Don't ever delete conversations.--DannyBoy7783 04:23, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Please tell me there's a punishment for doing so. That kind of thing is just not cool. --AdmThrawn 04:24, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • i'm sorry.-user:remoh
        • No you aren't you liar. if you were sorry you wouldn't have done it in the first place nor would you have removed comments by AdmThrawn either!--DannyBoy7783 04:26, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Tell it to the judge, Remoh. --AdmThrawn 04:28, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

now here we go, with you doing the thing that started this whole thing: overreacting. believe what you want. i'm sorry. - User:Remoh

  • Stop screwing with conversations Remoh. If AdmThrawn made a comment first don't put yours before it. --DannyBoy7783 04:37, 14 Jan 2006

(UTC)

    • you still overreacted and i told you, i don't remember editing his page!-user:remoh

Can you people please stop fighting over this? This is totally unnecassary and there are better things you can do such as improving articles and looking for Star Wars stuff that aren't in Wookieepedia. User:MyNz 04.43, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

he has a point.-user:remoh

  • I consider malicious deletion to be worthy of an argument.--DannyBoy7783 04:49, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

you make everything into an argument.-user:remoh

  • Not quite little boy. You were the one who left those ridiculous questions on my user page.--DannyBoy7783 05:00, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

little boy? you automatticly know my age? and once again that last comment sounded like an argument.-user:remoh

  • I can tell how old you are by the way you talk. If you want to call it an argument be my guest. I'd call it pointing out the obvious truth.--DannyBoy7783 05:14, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

You know who's cool? Darth Maul. CooperTFN 05:16, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • True dat. --AdmThrawn 05:24, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • I like Darth Maul. He died prematurely I think.--DannyBoy7783 05:28, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

what does that have to do with anything?-user:remoh

  • You don't think he's cool? CooperTFN 05:29, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Jealous. --AdmThrawn 05:32, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • We're trying to change the subject as a sign that all three people arguing have been at this too long, and (assuming they live in the Western Hemisphere) too late into the evening. And personally, I think Count Dooku had a lot more style. Good night, everyone. — Silly Dan 05:33, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

well, yeah. and i do wish his resurrection stories were true, but that has nothing to do with the conversation. what am jealous of? ami supposed to be jealous of danny's fake age reading abilities(by the way he's wrong)? or the fact that starts an argument any chance he gets?-user:remoh

  • This is boring me. Later fellas. Good luck on not getting banned Remoh.--DannyBoy7783 05:38, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • [Redacted by administration]-user:remoh
  • I did like Resurrection (and wouldn't mind it becoming canon), but I'm glad he died when he did; he'd fulfilled his use, after all. Can you see him starting a Separatist movement? CooperTFN 05:39, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

i actually do. but under palpatine's directions. he could be the boss who barely says anything and is always ominous.-user:remoh

  • I don't see him and Grievous getting along. CooperTFN 05:45, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

greivous didn't really like dooku either. i do see a really cool version of that sparring session in Star Wars: Clone Wars chap 22.-user:remoh

DannyBoy7783

Stop interfering with my user page. Keep doing it and there will be consequences.--DannyBoy7783 20:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

  • What?-user:remoh
    • You already tried this "I don't know what you are talking about" thing before. The history doesn't lie. You or someone you know deleted a section of my user page. Deny it all you want or pretend you don't know but you do and the history proves it.--DannyBoy7783 22:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
      • I checked your page's history page. The person who vandilized your page's IP adress was 207.166.7.208. Mine is 71.193.19.140. It obviously wasn't me.-User:Remoh
        • That's not much of a defense. A simple whois lookup shows that 207.166.7.208 is registered to the Sacramento County Office of Education, meaning it's used by a school board office or a school in Sacramento, and 71.193.19.140 is a Comcast cable address in Sacramento County. The odds are against that being a coincidence. —Darth Culator (talk) 23:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
          • Really? Weird. Still didn't vandalize his page though. And for the last time, Danny, I do not remember, even though it is obvious that I did, editing out what ever comment Thrawn posted. -User:Remoh
            • Just because the IP doesn't match your user name's IP doesn't mean that you are innocent. Also, you made other vandalizing edits besides removing a comment by AdmThrawn. I'm not interested in your lies Remoh, I'm simply informing you that if you continue to screw with my page there will be consequences.--DannyBoy7783 00:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
              • My god, you're paranoid. Believe whatever you want, but for the last time, I did not vandilize your page...this time.-User:Remoh
                • Whether you did it yourself or had a friend do it I hold you responsible. Perhaps if you weren't NAMED SPECIFICALLY I'd believe you....--DannyBoy7783 00:43, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

I think I know who vandilized your page. I have a friend named Ashley. I told her about our previous incedint and she suggested taking action. You know what happened after that. She must have vandalized your page in hope of not pushing the blame towrads me. I apologize for her actions.-User:Remoh

  • I don't care about your lies Remoh. Stop vandalizing my page.--DannyBoy7783 04:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

What. Ever.-User:Remoh

Talk page

If you don't want this stuff publicly displayed, you can create an archive and put it there. Deleting talk page content is considered bad form around here. Thanks. StarNeptune 22:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

  • He also removed a previous discussion from 2 weeks ago. Check the history and you'll find it.--DannyBoy7783 22:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

If you want to play that game I can go back and correct all of your syntax as well. Now shush, it's past your bedtime. --DannyBoy7783 02:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

  • I use them more than you, little boy. And it's only 6:23 p.m. where I am. That would be your bedtime.-User:Remoh
    • Ooo, darn, you got me Remoh. You are a witty one.--DannyBoy7783 02:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Come on guys, enough already. Please stop. --Azizlight 02:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Thank you, Azizlight.-user:remoh
    • What are you thanking Azizlight for? The only reason I'm even talking here is because you are a filthy page vandal who can't learn how to leave people's pages alone. Don't pretend like you are innocent by saying "thank you" to Azizlight--DannyBoy7783 04:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
      • I'm thanking him because he (i guess temporarily) put a stop to the argument that was starting to get very annoying. i am fully aware of the reason you're here. now please get out of my page.-user:remoh PREPARE TO BE IGNORED, ATTENTION SEEKER!
        • He didn't put a stop to anything. I had things to do besides sit here and vainly attempt to get you to stop being a page vandal. When I was no longer busy I returned in the hopes that you would see the light and quit this childish behavior.--DannyBoy7783 05:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
          • Well then you should have left about 13 comments ago. I've seen the light. You just insisted on continuing the argument.-user:remoh

Can't you two just stop bothering each other? And no, pointing out that the other guy started it, correcting the other guy's spelling, or similar attempts to get the last word, do not count as dropping the arguement. Just let it go already. — Silly Dan 22:14, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

  • God, you guys are worse than VT-16 and McEwok. And that's really saying alot. -- SFH 22:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I'm secretly hoping that if I annoy him enough this time he will stop vandalizing my page in the future. It's not that it's hard to revert, it's just disrespectful and no one will ban him for it. I know that once this nonsense blows over now he'll do it again in two weeks or pretend to be an anon or something. Honestly, I shouldn't have to worry about that kind of stuff. He should just learn to be a civil individual and leave me alone.--DannyBoy7783 22:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)--DannyBoy7783 06:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
      • I'm tempted to ban you both for a cooldown period. Granted, Remoh had no right to vandalize Danny's page, but the fact that Danny also keeps aggravating him is not helping. I would like for both of you put this behind you. If not, I will perform a cooldown ban on you both. StarNeptune 23:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
        • i would have liked this conversation to end awhile ago.-user:remoh
          • Guys calm down. I'm Not pointing fingers but Remoh, you started it But then you apologized and thats good Dannyboy,you could have finished it a long time ago;Ever consider he is telling the truth? I'm getting sick of the arguing so let bygones be bygones OK?FB93
            • It is over. If you had checked the timestamp in my sig you'd have noticed that for some reason Remoh has removed it from his, though I don't know why. I don't really see what you are "sick of" because his isn't even your talk page. To answer your question: yes, I did consider he was telling the truth but it doesn't really matter if he vandalized my user page or his friend did. It was vandalized on his behalf. That's all that really matters. Also, don't spaz out on me Remoh, I'm not rehashing this argument again just answering the question. Fireball, I think you should really worry about yourself for now. You've only been here for two and a half weeks and I notice most of your edits are on talk pages. Perhaps you should try editing some articles and making contributions instead of jumping into disagreements between people. The site has plenty of admins and users who have been here longer who can take care of that--DannyBoy7783 06:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
              • How DARE you! I had to rewrite an entire page that looked like it was written by a 7 year old! I was just sick of finding remnants of your arguments everywhere!Fireball93 03:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
                • Remoh, I apologize for this being on your talk page. I know we don't get along very well but I try and respect people's pages and this doesn't belong here. Fireball, if you really care to continue this please do it at MY talk page. Thank you.--DannyBoy7783 05:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
                  • actually, i had no idea you guys were still talking about this, but thank you for continuing on your talk page danny.-user:remoh
                    • yeah.Sorry about that.--Fireball93 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
                      • yeah and danny, i apologize for all i've done and what i will do, WHICH I WILL! kidding.-user:remoh

Conversation

  • as a matter of fact, I did. Did you have a specific one in mind?Padme829 00:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Padme829
    • 81 and 82. i liked those. say, do you watch Teen Titans?-user:remoh
      • Yeah, I got those two, I think, nope I don't watch Teen TitansPadme829 04:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Padme829

That Ewok Jedi Image on Your User Page.

I have used it for my own profile despite your request/demand not to. I feel that, since I am in fact the Ewok Jedi portrayed in that crude drawing, I am with right to use it. I apologize for any hard feelings. Ewok Jedi 19:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)