Welcome, <insert name here> to the talk page of Jediknight19bby. Feel free to bring all your complaints, comments, and suggestions on this page.
Archives: 1
300px|thumb|By the time discussions are over, we should all look like the above.
Grievous Objection
On the FA page, you objected to Grievous, saying "Conflicting sources should be sorted out". What specifically do you mean? As that issue has not been sorted out by Lucasfilm and Chee, we just decided to go with Labyrinth of Evil, keeping the info regarding that to a minimum to prevent as much contradiction as possible. A note about that conflicting sources is in Bts. Is there anything you had in mind, becuase as it stands, not much can be done short of removing info and rephrasing it so LOE and Clone Wars contradicitons aren't brought up. Chack Jadson Talk 00:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for going with LoE. I hate to have conflicting sources with FA noms. Jediknight19bby (Jedi High Council Chambers!) 00:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
RE:Warning
My bad it was an accident when I removed your message. I had every intention of putting it back up. Thanks bud. Jedi Master Mike 9:53 19 August, 2007 (UTC)
- Okay thanks! Jedi Master Mike 9:59 19 August, 2007 (UTC)
Goodwood's talk page
- Goodwood nominated the article for GA with the consent of the article's creator, Culator. It was decided on IRC that, if they both wanted it, then they were both entitled to the box—Culator since he obviously wrote the darn thing, and Goodwood for nominating it as a GAN. Also, Jediknight19bby, the last line of your comment to Goodwood is unnecessary and unwarranted. You yourself just got off of a block from editing for WP:NPA. Anything further like that will be carefully watched, and I suggest that you leave warnings and whatnot to Administrators—if you have a problem with a user, then bring it to the attention of an admin. Greyman(Paratus) 22:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Re:
- Well, since you asked, here's why: Wormhead is not like WP:NEGTC, which is open to anyone. It's a user subpage of mine, so I have total control over it. As for why I keep removing you, I think it's pretty clear from your past history that you are not ready or capable of handling FA-level work yet. Plus, your skill in the area of spelling/grammar is cast into doubt by the numerous errors in your motto and userpage. You've already been told about this before, so I suggest you work on other Quote:Mara Jade Skywalker|things Sorry if I seem harsh, but I want Luke to be a really great article and that means high-quality contribs. If I need help with it or if I need it copyedited, I will let you know. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 20:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for 3 months for a constant disregard of policy (The latest having a guestbook, no matter what you name it, on your userpage. And No, ignorance of policy is not a defense since that specific policy has been around for almost the entire calender year), and community disruption. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified.Greyman(Paratus) 23:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Re: Adminship
First of all, I need to say that this may be irrelevant considering you are blocked. I'm sorry to hear that. But now regarding your question, I was flattered and thrilled to read your question. However, I have known for months that if I were nominated I would turn it down, as I am not 18. I really appreciate your offer, and I would like to accept, but I must turn it down. Rollback is the only thing I could get at this point. Thanks again for your offer. Hopefully you'll not be blocked for long. Thanks again. Chack Jadson Talk 00:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)