Talk: Goodwood/Archive 4

thumb|200px|right|Don't preach to the choir...

Leave a message at the beep.

Shem-Lern's ship

Thanks for your contribution but you can see I just created the article so just let me enough time to finish what I've started. Thanks and best regards. Klow 21:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

• Sorry, thought you were done. A lot of folks tend to just make very simple articles and leave it at that (not suggesting you do this, mind). I noticed that this was the case while cleaning out the Starships and Vehicles categories.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 22:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Expanding your vocabulary

For your edification. --Qwo 06:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

RE:Zaerdra

Hmm, maybe it's only for my computer or dial-up users. Anyway, I'm can't show you a shot of how it looks to me because my computer doesn't have the capability to do so. I checked again and it's still in front for me but if it works for other people, then I guess there's no problem. I'll go for the nomination now. NaruHina ^Talk 20px 00:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks mate. And in future, every computer has the capacity to take a screenshot. Just press the Print Screen button located next to F12, open up a graphic arts program (MS Paint will work) then Paste the shot in like you would text.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 00:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Massacre at Ossus FA Nomination

At least some of the objections have been fixed by know, can you check it out so you can start striking them out. Besides some of your objections are ridicule such as

"These two sentences are just...horrible. "Unknown to him was that, that relationship between his Empire and the Jedi Order could never happen. The Jedi would never be loyal to an Empire supporting Siths, something Darth Krayt knew and one of the main reasons he planned the Massacre"

Yet I also fixed those "horrible" sentences. Dookurules338 13:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

• It is the accepted format to respond to objections by replying to each one on the FAN page itself. Please do so in the future, following the example of other FA writers when they respond. Anyway, I have to be honest with you, as it stands, this article has little chance of becoming an FA.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 14:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:

• Okay, I just haven't gotten back that far down the list yet. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 19:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Bugslut

I can't take credit for Denning's dialogue—it is Lumiya who calls her bugslut, in case you didn't know! But by "the two major sections", you mean the Mission to Myrkr and the From Coruscant to Ebaq 9, right?

Thanks for the input. I'm racing to get up to The Joiner King done before I go away on Monday…

Harrar 23:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey Goodwood

Anymore word on the KOTOR project? I mean do we need to expand any more articles or anything? Devan2 21:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Can't Come

I have to attend an amesh meeting that weekend in Montana. *I know.* So I won't be able to attend the IRC meeting on that Saturday. NaruHina ^Talk 20px 06:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

• Understood. If possible, please attempt to enter the WP:KOTOR channel to discuss things either before or after the meeting.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 13:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Meeting

I will do my best to come. I dont have anything planned for that weekend at the moment, but obviously if something does come up my own personal life comes before this site, hope you understand. - –K.A.J^{•T•C•E•} 09:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

• Understood. Thank you for your reply. Hope to see you at the meeting!--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 12:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate Article Dispute

This is Admiral Jolyon. Can we talk about the Speedy Deletions you are doing? (Admiral jolyon 13:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC))

• I know who you are by your sig. In regards to the CSDs, it's because you chose to unilaterally decide what was best for a number of articles, despite the fact that they were created by an Administrator with a considerable amount of experience on the wiki. I suggest that, in future, you take it up with the person before performing edits of that nature.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 13:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
  • I have asked the Administrator Thefourdotelipsis to discuss this, he has "not" responded. Perhaps I am impatient, but I worry about forgetting about the matter to often. I do want to help him but what he has done is also duplicated some articles as well. (Admiral jolyon 13:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC))
    • Patience, my young apprentice. He will either respond or not.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 13:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
      • Indeed. As you'll note, Admiral jolyon, he hasn't edited any pages since well before you left that message. He's probably away from his computer. Since people DO sleep, it may be several hours before you get a reply. jSarek 13:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

• Please forgive me. If you and other administrators can bring this to the Senate (if that is what it is called?) and we come to an agreement that will help a lot. I sometimes assume that it is the same time as the other party and I guess that asssumption is normally wrong. Note: It is my birthday today, I am 19 today (Admiral jolyon 13:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC))
  • Congratulations. However, may I suggest that you perhaps hold off on that? As the saying goes, sometimes we can make mountains out of molehills. Remember, part of editing here is the assumption of good faith on behalf of other users.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 13:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
• Right. I assume you have Star Wars: TIE Fighter? (Admiral jolyon 13:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC))
  • Unfortunately, the pleasure of playing the X-wing/TIE Fighter/Alliance series of games has thus far been denied me. As such, I am unfortunately in no position to lend assistance in regards to those articles.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 13:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
• That is unfortunate. My reasons for making Z-Jumimi into "Jumimi" was because of game engine statistics.(Admiral jolyon 14:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC))

• • As for my claim for duplicate articles I made one called Omar (Deep Space Manufacturing Facilities) and "Thefourdotelipsis" made similar ones called Omar 1, 2 and 3 which have the same plot summary, minus the part that they were destroyed. (Admiral jolyon 14:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC))

Project

My apologies, but I cannot come to the meeting. Please understand, and do not destroy my planet. Darthan the destroyer 22:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

• Don't worry, I won't destroy your planet...Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 03:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Contact

Hey, please meet me in IRC at your earliest convenience. Thanks.—Tommy9281 20px ^{(Peace is a lie)} 22:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Meeting

Thanks for letting me know about the metting, Goodwood. Unfortunately, my library doesn't allow chat rooms, so I will not be able to attend the meeting. Could you give me more info on what's going on beacuse I really do believe in this project, and don't want to stop being a part of it.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

• I left a similar note on the forum for the meeting on the project page, and would like to express some concerns now, since I willnot be able to attend. I'm not naming any names, since it's not my style, but when I nominated Darth Malak for the GA, a few of the users at the time who were a part of the project seemed unwilling to help me, even though it's one of the main focuses of the project. I feel that when an article is nominated that is a focus of the project, no matter who nominated it, it should be improved by all members of the project if available.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Darth Traya

I would like to start a copy-edit for the Kreia article, where the users involved in the project can go and edit Kreia as needed. Will that be alright?--Jedi Kasra (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:WP:KOTOR Reorg Meeting

Saturday will probably be a busy day for me, so I might not be able to make it to the IRC meeting, sorry. -- I need a name (Complain here) 11:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

• Goodwood: I too will not be able to make the meeting tonight. I apologize. Master Aban Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 15:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

KOTOR group

I am still interested although I will not be able to make the meeting. I will be out of town.

RE:meeting

yo, Goodwood its me, Zhran. I won't be able to attend the meeting, im sorry. i want to continue on the project however--Zhran 20:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Binding Ceremony

Hey,

If you're still around, the beginning of the (gamemechanics) template in the Legacy section needs to be moved to under those two paragraphs I just added there. If not, I'll just grab it sometime later. Thanks.—Tommy9281 20px ^{(Peace is a lie)} 02:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

SOHK--REC

Sir Goodwood,

At your earliest convenience, a favor from you I can use please, in my restricted editing capacity. If you click on my name as it appears in my signature, you will find the Anvil. Under the section titled, "SOHK", please add a duel infobox directly under the title for me? With that, please add one of these: File:.jpg at 250px?

Also, there is a section titled "video games", with which you are well versed, much more so than I. I would appreciate any input you could lend in that area. You add to it or just give me advice, however you see fit. Of course, should you choose to, I will credit your assistance graciously.

If you can manage these things for me, I would be be most appreciative, and quite indebted to you. Thanks.—Tommy9281 20px ^{(Peace is a lie)} 04:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

• If I've understood your request correctly, than what you have asked for has been done. It was no trouble at all, and please feel free to mercilessly edit what has been put there. :-) Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 07:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Template for Sepan Campaign

This is Admiral jolyon. Requesting a new template for the Sepan campaign. (Admiral jolyon 09:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC))

• This is Field Marshal Goodwood. Much regret, unable (MRU). Perhaps a more skilled being could serve you better.--Field Marshal Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 09:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

• Roger that. Unfortunate. I assummed that given your ability to make Featured Articles, images, etc. I thought you could make a template like the Aftermath of Hoth. Do you know anyone who can? (Admiral jolyon 10:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC))

Drunost

I just wanted to say thanks for your help on the Drunost article. :) Much appreciated - Aqua Unasi 19:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

• It was no problem at all. Hopefully we've both learned something. :-) Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 21:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Duel on the Star Forge

I'd like to close this TC thread out, and as you're the nominator as well as head of the KOTOR team, I figured I'd ask if you'd do the honor of the merger. Thanks. Graestan^(Talk) 03:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

• I'd be more than happy to do the merger, yes, as it was my intention to eventually FA Battle of Rakata Prime, however the current TC looks like it's stuck at "no consensus". Thank you for asking.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 05:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Republic Army

• The image on Republic Army is actually an image of Republic Crewman. Crewman is a navy term. And if you see the image that it was cropped from, you will notice that they are in the bridge of a Hammerhead-Class Cruiser. That is not army.

  

  • Within both KotOR games, both army and navy soldiers are shown with the same uniforms. Specifically, in the Ludo Kressh's tomb sequence of KotOR II, the Exile encounters a vision of forces of the Republic that served under her at the battle of Dxun. They are wearing the exact same uniforms, both enlisted and officer, as those shown in the above picture.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 06:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
    • But, the image was cropped from a picture of the republic navy, was it not? Nebulax 07:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
      • Possibly. However, in both games, the uniforms are used interchangeably. Therefore the assumption that the uniforms could represent the Army is a plausible one.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 07:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
        • The image is still of Repulbic Navy Members...
        • It doesn't matter if they wear the same uniforms; if it's not a picture of the Army it doesn't belong in the Army article. - Lord Hydronium 07:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
          • Your pardon, but the assumption is still a logical one. That, and the picture has been there for nearly two years.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 07:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
            • Again, it doesn't matter what you assume about the uniforms. It's not a picture of the Army. It doesn't belong in the Army article. Do not put it back in. - Lord Hydronium 07:15, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
              • Yes, your highnessness.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 07:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Edly Fasalk

Thanks for seeing to the objections on the Edly Fasalk GAN. I've been ill for the past week and haven't really been able to focus on a computer screen until recently. Many thanks! - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 14:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

• No problem mate, was happy to help.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 14:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Laigrek

Hi, I noticed that after Laigrek reached FA status, you went and reverted a number of edits made by Toprawa and Ralltiir when he copy-edited the article as part of his Inquisitorius review. Also, changes you made which Toprawa requested in his review have been overturned, as well. I believe that this edit was in bad faith, and is most likely a reduction in quality from the article's final state when it passed review. Also, Toprawa and Ralltiir would not have approved the article with such portions that he removed. Mind you, Toprawa is an a very precarious position to go around reverting your bad-faith reverts, and I suspect there is more to these actions than is clearly shown by your changes, which are in violation of WP:POINT and the FA rules, as well as rather uncivil in their subversiveness. I am going to revert the edits, and a response with valid reasoning for your actions would be appreciated. Graestan^(Talk) 22:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

• While it is certainly understandable that you should feel this way about what I did to the Laigrek article, please understand that it was not done with any ulterior motive. In all honesty I felt that the article was of better quality this way, and having played the game from which it was derived multiple times, it was also felt that this gave me a better perspective on the subject (To add context to that remark, Toprawa himself has never played the game; this is not a failing, but something that should be considered). I cannot and therefore will not attempt to debate the validity of policy violations inherent in the edit. I would ask, however, that you allow me to demonstrate how my version (the one you reverted) was better; at the same time, perhaps we could come to a compromise between the two versions.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 23:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Pointing out Toprawa's supposed failings is the absolute last thing I wanted to be reading.

You have been blocked from editing for two weeks for violating WP:POINT and subverting the FAN process, particularly Rule 17. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Graestan^(Talk) 23:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

The Meeting

Goodwood I regret not being able to attend the wp:kotor meeting held on Friday the 18th. The reason I couldn't attend was because i had gone abroad. Sorry once again.Devan2 05:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

I, Jedi

Since I see you are working on I, Jedi and have the "in use" tag on it, just wanted to point out that I, Jedi is no longer the only item of fiction written entirely in the first-person. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 00:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Bao-Dur

Could we please try and add to the personality section of the Bao-Dur page? Thanks Devan2 14:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, Goodwood. Haven't been here in a while, but I'm back now. Wanted to let you know, and will get working on Kreia's article.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Black Vulcar Base Article

Goodwood sir we need some pictures for the black vulcar base article how many should we aim to put in the article? Devan2 21:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

• At least three: one for the infobox showing the main level (which is there), one composite picture that shows the maps to both areas of the base, and a third, of the garage level.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 22:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
• Got it thanks sir. Devan2 15:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Good looks

Tommy9281 has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! Thanks for adding vital KOTOR info to several TOTJ articles, and for your insight into the world of video game duels.

You've helped me tremendously in my time here, and I can't thank you enough. Cheers to you, Goodwood.—Tommy9281 20px ^{(Peace is a lie)} 20:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for the award, mate. The pleasure was all mine. :-) Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 23:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Kreia

How come there's an edit war about the Kreia article? I wanted to make a few edits to the page but I recently found out about it. What happened sir? And can we do anything about it? I mean help or come to a conclusion to the article? Devan2 21:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Greek?

You have a userbox which containing greek letters(αθεος).I am from Greece(and atheist too) and I want to ask you if there are other userboxes written in Greek.spartan-53 Darth Odysseas 09:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Zaerdra

• FYI, Toprawa isn't quite satisfied with some of the objections on this nom, so if you're still interested in pursuing it, you might want to e-mail him about the matter. Thanks. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 04:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
  • I've attempted to contact him before and he was singularly uninterested in communicating. It would be nice if he could take the time to work things out on the FAN page.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 08:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
    • I heard differently; the above talk page post came about after he suggested that you two e-mail or otherwise discuss it privately, but it's your call. I'd say this is a good case to assume good faith and attempt to make inroads on the nomination again. Atarumaster88 20px ^{(Talk page)} 20:27, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
      • Alright then, I'll have a go at it. Edit: Actually, there's one small problem...I haven't got a clue what his e-mail address is; it's not on his userpage.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 23:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Hello, Goodwood. Just wanted to let you know that I'm back, was in an accident which broke two vertebrae in my mon's back, was and still am taking care of her, but she's getting better, so I'm resuming my schedule of coming to the library three times a week. Anyway, is it O.K. if I start a sub-page where the members of the KotOR project can work on Darth Traya's article, similar to what the Legacy era project did with Darth Maladi's article? Just want your approval before I start it, that's all. Cheers--Jedi Kasra (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Just so you know

Just wanted to let you know about an edit I made to your caption page. File:Ahsokainfobox.jpg was re-uploaded in higher resolution and because you didn't have a width designator on the image, it made it over 1000px wide on your caption page, so I set the width on the image back to it's previous size of 256px. Hope that's OK with you. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 19:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks for that, mate.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 20:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: WP:KOTOR

I tried to join a few weeks ago, but KotOR didn't work on either of my two computers. I just got a new computer though, so I'll try to install later today or tomorrow. I'll get back to you once I figure out whether it'll work properly. It's a Vista, and KotOR is a 2001 game, so yeah, I'll give at a go, but no promises. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 08:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Good to see you around again, Wood. I'd very much like to converse with you sometime in the near future.—Tommy928117px ^{(Peace is a lie)} 14:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks Tommy, it's good to be back. Look forward to conversing with you...try the KotOR channel.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 21:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

KotOR project tasks

Hey Goodwood. First, let me say that its good to see you here. I know you don't know me and I'm fairly new to the Wook and the project, but I felt somewhat aimless without someone to direct our focus and fill our "leader" position. That said, I would really appreciate it if you could look over Telos IV and make any edits or whatnot as you see fit. For some reason I've lost my ability to look at it objectively (plus, I'm horrible at introductions). I've also asked Graestan for the same, since GA standards seem to have gone up a lot, and judging by the pace my Visas Marr GA nom is going I would rather have Telos keep its GA status than try to restore it. Thanks a lot. Cylka^-talk- 17:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

• Thank you very much for that, Cylka. I'd be happy to take a look at the Telos IV article for you (as well as have a go at the intro if you'd like). Understood about the GA requirements; it doesn't seem right, but that's the will of the Wook, apparently. Looking forward to the meeting?--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 21:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hi, Goodwood. It's good to have you back. I've been working on my sub-page for the Kreia article. How everything going?--Jedi Kasra (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Changing links

Please try to be conscious to avoid this when changing links. Thanks, -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 16:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

• Apologies if that disrupted the flow of the article, however I am not sure what exactly the issue is, since "CR90 Corellian Corvette" redirects to "CR90 corvette" anyway. The FarStar is a CR90 corvette, albeit heavily modified to the point where it barely resembles a vessel of that class.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 22:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • The point is that it's a publisher's summary so it shouldn't be altered like that. -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 23:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Oh, okay, that was my bad. Thanks.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 23:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
      • No worries, just something to look out for. -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 23:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
        • Will do, thanks for the heads-up. This war on redirects can sometimes dull one's perception...kind of like the "War on Terror".--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 23:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: A-280 Blaster Rifle

Please provide the specific link and/or location of the information which states that this weapon was not in Battlefront I or II. This could, perhaps, be of benefit to the "Behind the scenes" section, pointing out the possibly incorrect nomenclature used within the game and/or publication surrounding thereof.

How about Wookieepedia's own page? DH-17_blaster_rifle

There was no "incorrect nomenclature within the game and/or publication surrounding thereof" (unnecessary obfuscation), since the A-280 article posted no sources as to why it was in Battlefront I or II. As seen in the linked article, any publication, official or otherwise, confirms that it is a DH-17.

Not that it makes a whole lot of difference, but why was it changed when this error was corrected earlier (albeit on an anonymous computer)? The same information (about this being available at the Lucasarts page) was made available; it's no more than a 30-second hop over there to confirm it. --Maveritchell ^(talk)22:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

• A link always helps; in any case, it should be provided for the article.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 22:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Links were provided for the article - the DH-17 article. There are no links for the A-280 article because it is incorrect and unsupported information.
    • Your pardon, sir, but I have yet to actually see a link posted anywhere. Please provide a link in the article itself, describing how it states that the rifles in these games are DH-17s.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 23:01, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
      • Look, oh, I don't know, about five lines above, where I linked to Wookieepedia's article on the DH-17_blaster_rifle

Warning

Please do not engage in bad-faith reversion, as you have done here, in the future. You violated the spirit of the three-revert rule, if not the technical rule itself, by reverting the edit three times in two days. As well, the other editor involved mentioned a source; knee-jerk reversion instead of making a query or checking the source mentioned yourself is an assumption of bad faith. Your vigilance concerning the recent changes is appreciated, but please try not to be so heavy-handed about it in the future. Graestan^(Talk) 23:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

• With all due respect, I did not simply revert the article and leave it at that, then revert again. After the second instance, I asked the editor(s) to further substantiate their source on the talk page for the article in question. In addition, a link was provided for DH-17 blaster rifle, and so I am now quite prepared to drop this and apologize to the editor in question. Maveritchell, you have my apologies for assuming that this was a knee-jerk edit, and for the edit-war it provoked.--Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 23:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Nevertheless, the spirit of the edit was negative, while Maveritchell was indeed in the right; I checked it myself. Telling him to provide a link after he mentioned the website is semantics, and you're not lawyering your way out of this warning. Please conduct yourself with prudence or leave the patrolling and reversion to the administration. Thank you. Graestan^(Talk) 23:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
    • No worries for now, but I have had issues with heavy-handed editing in the past (as an infrequent editor myself). I mod the game Battlefront II and as such am very familiar with the weaponmodels and what they should look like and what they don't. I can see where someone less familiar might make the error. --Maveritchell ^(talk) 23:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:KOTOR

So is there any criteria I need to pass in order to join? I put my name down on the member's list before I realized I should probably ask first just in case. JethLordMaster ^(Talk) 00:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• Well, if there was a test (which there isn't, heh), you've already passed it. Congratulations on passing Brianna for GA, mate! Welcome to the project, and don't forget to join us in the IRC channel if you can. :-) Goodwood 20px ^{(Alliance Intelligence)} 00:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Chalmun's cookie

Cylka-talk- has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! For supporting me and showing me the many paths to choose from.

Apology

No apology necessary, Goodwood :) I was just following the general trend of current battle articles. If and when your CT passes, I would have no trouble rejigging my articles to conform to a new standard. - Cavalier One20px^{(Squadron channel)} 09:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

A Parting Gift

NaruHina Talk 14px has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! to give you something to munch on while you try and figure out what to do without Cylka and me. Visit in the channel anytime.

Atris and Kreia

Hey, Goodwood. I am currently working on the Kreia and the Atris articles, trying to get them updated. Just wanted to let you know that I'm working and am still heavily involved with this project.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)