See Archive 1

Welcome to my talk page. If you have any questions for me, feel free to ask them here.

The answer to your question

Well, the types of articles I work on are basically any article I come across that I'm familiar with. However, I don't like to read or even look at articles with those cartoon images...like some of those Ewok cartoon things...cuz I don't like the coloring...I'm used to the realistic 3-D computer generated graphics and images from movies. I created two articles. The first one was the V-6 haywire grenade. They were grenades used by the clone troopers in Star Wars: Battlefront. I realized that an article called EMP grenades were already created though. The Merr-Sonn V-6 haywire grenades are just a type of EMP grenade. I also created the DH-17 blaster rifle article (not to be confused with the DH-17 blaster carbine and the DH-17 blaster pistol. In the Star Wars: Battlefront II article, it says that the rifle that the rebel soldiers wielded were A280 blaster rifles. I talked on the discussion page about the issue in which sources (including LucasArts.com, the games themselves, and the game guides) all state that the blaster rifles the rebel soldiers used were actually DH-17 blaster rifles. No one replied, so I just created an article anyways...I didn't find out about the article request page until later. I don't know how to upload images though, because I don't understand the difference between JPEG, PNG, GIF, etc. I went on Wikipedia for explanation but Wikipedia always have hard-for-me-to-understand articles... I wish I can upload an image for the DH-17...here's a place to find a good picture of it...though it's not exactly an image...I don't think. click here, go to the Navigate. Then click on "Gameplay." After that just click on "weapons" and "Alliance." It'll show the DH-17 blaster rifle somewhere there.

Oh, and thanks...I'm hoping that the club will last for a long time... but I need to update some information and there might be some accidental errors there. Cyfiero 02:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Okay, a Wookieepedian said that he made an observation that the short lightsabers of KotOR and KotOR II were 25% shorter than the regular lightsabers in both blade and hilt. This means that they are not exactly the same thing as shotos considering that shotos are way shorter. However, someone else said that shotos were probably the evolution of short lightsabers considering they were about 4 millenium apart. So, should there we revise the article a little bit about this? Cyfiero 05:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Yeah, we should. That's a good point. Maybe we can redirect "short lightsaber" to "shoto"?-- Darth Skirata 20px (Talk) 23:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
      • Well actually, short lightsaber is already redirected to shoto, I think. However, some other guy said that we should go to the Knowledge Bank first. Cyfiero 00:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
        • Ok, I posted in the Knowledge Bank. Let's wait for a response.-- Darth Skirata 20px (Talk) 14:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
          • Ok, sure. Cyfiero 06:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
            • I got a response.-- Darth Skirata 20px (Talk) 11:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
              • Ok, I think I get it now. The shotos and short lightsabers are the same thing. But the term "shoto" was not used until approx. four thousands years later when they shortened the length of the short lightsabers. Basically, they are the same and "shotos" was just a synonym word used to describe the shortened short lightsabers created during the Rise of the Empire era. That it? Thanks by the way! Cyfiero 19:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
                • That's good to know. No problem!-- Darth Skirata 20px (Talk) 20:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Btw

When I did my custom signature, I know it looks kind of like yours. But I did not copy it. I would've used the Jedi Order symbol and those colors anyways. =] Cyfiero II 20px(Comlink) 04:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)