Canon
Hey, about your question to Bill: yes, we generally only cover canonical topics from official Star Wars sources (although we do include official non-canon, but make sure it is clearly marked as such). If you're interested in fan-fiction, however, you should probably check out the Star Wars Fanon Wiki. Hope that helps! -- Ozzel 18:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thank you and about the lego company so i herd the lego star wars be renewed to 2011 because i love the lego star wars stuff that they made and they should make more EU stuff and i get lego star wars stuff and i build my own lego creations and it will be sad if they end lego star wars in 2011 and they should not end it in 2011 because they should end it in 2030 and i will keep building!!!my lego stuff out of star wars and i'vv been thinking that i should do a battle thing with my stormys and other lego stuff i buy and post it up on MOCpages and i like doing star wars stuff and dude i was also doing a agent smith minifig the agent smith from the MATRIX and do a comedy on MOCpages a star wars comic with smith and stuffBoba fett 32 15:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
leia was beaten up by jabba the hutt??
hey you know what? i saw (and have ROTJ but it broke)and i saw luke getting his butt kick by the rancer (well he almost did) after the monster was killed i did not know that leia was beaten up by jabba (poor girl)when did she get beaten up? tell me please i did not saw that part in the movie tell me-Boba fett 32 20:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- She wasn't as far as we know. Drewton 23:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
but what if she was? i mean if she was in a deferent outfit and punished by him that fat piece of crap! now if jabba can go in a toilet and an ewok put a bomb in the toilet and jabba can blow up! hahahahahaha! now i think leia would go hahahahahahaahahaha! and there! now how does that sound? to you?
- It's just a 'what if' thing. There's no evidence that it happened. Drewton 16:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Warning
Take it easy on talk pages, or you will be blocked from editing. Graestan(Talk) 18:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
ok i just love legos well for wikia ok..-Boba fett 32 19:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- LEGO has nothing to do with Wookieepedia, except for its one page. Drewton 19:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
well i know that for sure one page-Boba fett 32 19:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
some assassin droids
dude i just love that A-series assassin droid page and that B3-ultra battle droid i think those droids are cool dont you think?
- Unfortunately, if I were to agree, although the answer would be indeed clear, simple, and straightforward, there would be some difficulty in justifying assigning to it the fourth of the epithets you applied to the statement, inasmuch as the precise correlation between the information you communicated, and the facts insofar as they can be determined and demonstrated is such as to cause epistemological problems, of sufficient magnitude as to lay upon the logical and semantic resources of the English language a heavier burden than they can reasonably be expected to bear. Drewton 14:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
hey your star wars action figure movie looks cool-Boba fett 32 18:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk page comments
Please refrain from making comments on article talk pages that state your own personal opinions regarding the topic of said article. It is requested that you find another means of discussion, for example a Star Wars-themed forum.--Goodwood 
(Alliance Intelligence) 00:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
do you mean the mistake with the scout trooper talk page?-Boba fett 32 00:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed, but that is only part of the problem; you should not be posting messages such as "the armor sucks", or similar. This is an encyclopedia, not a debate club.--Goodwood
(Alliance Intelligence) 00:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
ok you got it!-Boba fett 32 01:02, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
stuff
i have not much to say but hi...-Boba fett 32 22:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
now....
now i have seen alot of vandelisem in other wikias and is a big load of garbage
- like vandelisem is garbage and we are the cleaners (maids) and by the time we clean it it gets messy AGAIN and we have to clean it over and over again..is that crap? well i volenter to help this wiki and the wikis that i join that has vandelisem.-Boba fett 32 02:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
what!?!?!?!?!?spam!?!?
oh crap!i spamed sorry my computer freezes some time how do i archive so i can get rid of unwanted topics? sorry-Boba fett 32 03:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- You spammed because your computer froze? Drewton
(Drewton's Holocron) 03:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
well yes because when it freezes my mouse goes every where (well my mouse has a laser then a ball) and i am clicking it to fix it but my topic was unfinished and i accidentally saveed it and thats why it spams-Boba fett 32 03:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Err, do you mean a double post, not spam? Drewton
(Drewton's Holocron) 03:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
oh a double post ok i thought it was spamming-Boba fett 32 03:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Edit it out of the talk page. Drewton (Drewton's Holocron) 03:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
um there?-Boba fett 32 04:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
any help around wookieepedia?
hey i would like to help to make this wiki with articles that are stubbed and that are unfinished any volunteering? (well thats why i joined)-Boba fett 32 15:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Iron Man Wiki edit
hey i would like to edit an article on the iron man wiki please? the iron monger page-Boba fett 32 18:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
kerberos panzer cops
hey i was on Phase III darktrooper and i was asking: How about we make a reference to kerberos panzer cops because the phase III armor is almost like the protect-gear from kerberos panzer cops talk to me and i will explain-Boba fett 32 03:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Userpage fanon
MadclawShyriiwook! 23:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
good article
Hey i love the OOM-9 article i really do! i love it!! best article and there will be more of those good articles sometime-Boba fett 32 01:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Template:Inuse
Hey. Please don't edit articles that have an {{Inuse}} template on them, regardless of what you find wrong with them. That tag means that someone is actively carrying out an edit to the article, and any other edits while the template is up can cause edit conflicts. If you do see something wrong with the article, chances are whoever is editing it will correct it him- or herself; if they don't, then feel free to correct it after the template is removed. Thanks and may the Force be with you! —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 01:43, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Sorry! i did not know but i will study Templates it will not happen again-Boba fett 32 01:55, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
A fiend
You are right about panaka he is a traitor and jar jar binks is the worse character of star wars universe
HELP
Hey I was trying to create an article on Star Wars Fanon wiki and the Editing page will not show except the sidebar and the save page button with the text select under it is something wrong with the web?-Boba fett 32 04:38, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
Formal protest against the clone war tv show
This has gone on long enough. The clone wars TV show is ruining the canon. I am stating my reasons for why I think the TV show should be removed from canon. The original 10-minute shorts from 2003 are canon as far as I am concerned because it developed story.
1. It is just too plain silly. Men in battle do not make funny comments and obvious statements in real life. It is not a serious show. The goofy voice acting has no place in Star Wars. The original clone wars shorts were cartoony but serious, people died, and it developed plausible stories. Season one was basically just a one-hour long episode. In the new series they are cramming at least one-hour of story into 30 minutes of nothing but fighting. They said that the malevolence arc was an arc. It was nothing of the sort, it was just three stories about the malevolence.
2.The goody-two-shoes aspect. The Clone Wars canon has been established we know definitively what happens in the end. The aspect of the prequel trilogy was in the fact that we know what happens but not how it happens. The aspect of the original 10-minute shorts was in the fact that since the phantom menace came out a slew of new characters was established. You cared about the characters. During the Battle of Hypori I was praying that aayla and mundi did not die. They did not but three other jedi were brutally murdered. Then you have some more of anakin's journey towards the dark side with the menacing premonition on nelvaan. It developed the battle of coruscant and more or less syncs up with labyrinth of evil. In this series you just know that none of the new main characters are going to die because they have too much importance in the series. The other main characters have their stories fully developed and the canon has already decided what happens to them at the end of the clone wars.
3.It is implausible. How can you build an eclipse star dreadnought sized ship in less that two years? The other implausible scenarios are just too numerous to list.
4. It is messing with already established canon. I have looked at the wookieepedia knowledge bank in recent months and the questions about canonicity are too many.
5. The general sillyness. Two whole episodes about astromechs? I couldn't follow it. Battle droids are not that stupid, and how can they mistake Jar Jar for a jedi? He is a senator. Senators are too recognizable.
In conclusion I think that the clone wars TV show should be removed from canon (not the original shorts from 2003) Sign your user name under this petition on my discussion page if you agree with me and please send this message to other wookiepedians. I am the reformer, this is my message. Signed Revanthereformer1138 User:Revanthereformer1138
..............? yeah.....pretty much...o_0...?-Boba fett 32 03:05, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
Original Trilogy remake? UGH!!
Don't tell me that George Lucas want to tarnish the Golden Originals with gay actors, fake effects, overuse of CGI and Hideous Creature and other crap?.-Boba fett 32 04:17, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Civility
Please make sure that Wookieepedia does not become a rantboard. While you are entitled to your own views, edits like these (and the most recent post on your talk page) border on the site's civility clause, and they can be cause for disruption, which is in some cases a blockable offense. This is said without spite, but if nothing nice can be said about something, then it's usually best to say nothing at all—rants on the site invite negative feelings and disruption, neither of which are desirable to anyone. Furthermore, please do not call others "gay" as a means of insult (as in your above post); it is offensive to a small but existent population of users on this site, and it also causes severe disruption. Thank you, and if you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. CC7567 (talk) 05:02, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Yes sir.-Boba fett 32 03:05, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
Erm, fett???
I just noticed, why are you talking on your own talk page? Anakin Skyobiliviator (talk) 08:49, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
Um...It's pry because your the most hated user on this community?-Boba fett 32 21:23, December 30, 2011 (UTC)