I have to say, this is a pretty good idea. Count me in for support at the eventual consensus track! --Imp 13:46, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- By the way, is it possible to turn this into a template? --Imp 13:49, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks :-) Yeah I'd like to figure out if a template would work, but it's time for me to go to bed now. Though feel free to take over if you like :-) --Azizlight 13:53, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Being a code caveman, the only solution I see is making a separate template for each number of sources/appearances. (For example: a subject with 14 sources would use "Template:14sources" whereas one with 9 sources would use "Template:9sources". --Imp 16:00, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Nah... You could probably do it with 3 templates: 1 for the header, one for each row, and one for the footer... I'll work on it tomorrow. --Azizlight 16:18, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Meh, you're right. I suggest you create a consensus track for this once the templates are up and running. --Imp 10:48, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Nah... You could probably do it with 3 templates: 1 for the header, one for each row, and one for the footer... I'll work on it tomorrow. --Azizlight 16:18, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Being a code caveman, the only solution I see is making a separate template for each number of sources/appearances. (For example: a subject with 14 sources would use "Template:14sources" whereas one with 9 sources would use "Template:9sources". --Imp 16:00, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks :-) Yeah I'd like to figure out if a template would work, but it's time for me to go to bed now. Though feel free to take over if you like :-) --Azizlight 13:53, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- You really want to see all articles look like that? -- Riffsyphon1024 10:56, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- It might be nice, but I think it's a *lot* of extra work. It's hard enough to get users to cite their sources as it is, let alone template them out and explain their notability. jSarek 11:34, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- We can implement it slowly, I think it's worth it. We can change the format at first, and then slowly add the notability later. As for the aesthetics, it will look better if we can get the columns on both tables to line up. --Azizlight 11:39, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- That's my real reason for disliking it. It looks ugly to me. -- Riffsyphon1024 21:48, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- We can implement it slowly, I think it's worth it. We can change the format at first, and then slowly add the notability later. As for the aesthetics, it will look better if we can get the columns on both tables to line up. --Azizlight 11:39, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- It might be nice, but I think it's a *lot* of extra work. It's hard enough to get users to cite their sources as it is, let alone template them out and explain their notability. jSarek 11:34, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)