- Please do not engage in reversion wars or you will be blocked. Your edits to Executor-class Star Dreadnaught contradict established canon. Atarumaster88
(Talk page) 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- The term Super Star Destroyer covers more than just the Executor-class vessels, and the term Executor-class Star Dreadnought is currently the canonical, technically correct name for the class. Please don't blank that article again: otherwise, we will block you from making any further edits. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- You've ignored the warning of two admins, and now you've been blocked for violating the WP:3RR for 1 day. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 21:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- You've ignored the warning of two admins, and now you've been blocked for violating the WP:3RR for 1 day. Atarumaster88
- The term Super Star Destroyer covers more than just the Executor-class vessels, and the term Executor-class Star Dreadnought is currently the canonical, technically correct name for the class. Please don't blank that article again: otherwise, we will block you from making any further edits. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. If you're concerned with privacy, registering also hides your IP address.
[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Proxy check] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]