What Happened?
- What happened to Luke and Ben and Jacen, and well, all of the jedi? If they are dead, then whomever did it would have to be quite powerful. Cade Skywalker, welcome to the galaxy. I look forward to these stroies. Thoughs? User:DarthMalus
- You know people do die of old age. -- Riffsyphon1024 18:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Never forget "social security doesn't start until 120." LOL...No but in all seriousness, The sith have re-emerged. User:DarthMalus
- I'm not too thrilled about it. I don't see how the skywalker legacy could be narrowed down to just one. But who knows, maybe it'll be OK. --Xwing328 18:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- It seems pretty ridiculous to me, but let's see... KEJ 10:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe Ben or someone along the line got unlucky when... well, you know. Perhaps it's a curse or something. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 00:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- It kind of makes the entire 'chosen-one' thing superfluous, donnit? KEJ 22:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely. If the Sith return full force, we might as well call Cade Skywalker the Chosen One if he defeats the Sith. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- It kind of makes the entire 'chosen-one' thing superfluous, donnit? KEJ 22:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe Ben or someone along the line got unlucky when... well, you know. Perhaps it's a curse or something. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 00:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- It seems pretty ridiculous to me, but let's see... KEJ 10:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Nope. The Chosen One was supposed to bring balance to the force. he did. the prophecy never said the sith would remain extinct. the series has obviously caused cognitive dissonance amongst the minds of fans.
Bad fanfic senses tingling! I forsee another book series like DBGT...
- I'm not supporting the "Cade is the Chosen One theory", but when exactly was the Chosen Ones Prophecy fortold? I was under the impression that is was first fortold in 25,000 BBY—18,000 years before the formation of the Sith Order. So when ever it was formed, I doubt that the Sith were neccessarily the ones they had in mind. I think the destruction of the Sith was just an assumption that the Jedi Order made. -- SFH 22:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- Chosen One or not. It looks really crappy. KEJ 22:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Sith'ari
- It's also worth noting that the Chosen One may also be the same thing as the Sith'ari. Jaywin 19:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Spoilers
I added the spoiler warning tag at the top of the page. If everybody thinks it's too much, then we can remove it. But as for me, if I didn't have this book yet, I wouldn't want to see some of these names here first. Better safe than sorry, IMO. -- Ozzel 21:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
This book is a source
This comic is a reference book, not a story. Therefore, IMO, it should be listed as a source. Obviously, all the characters in Legacy will also have the Legacy series listed under "Appearances". But this book is really no different than the Handbook series and should be listed the same way. -- Ozzel 04:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- No, because Legacy 0, like Legacy 1 up to 13, is a part of Star Wars: Legacy. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
12:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- I gotta disagree. It's part of the Legacy series, but the issue itself is more of a reference book than a story. -- Ozzel 19:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comics don't usually start at issue 0. I haven't read it, but is there any kind of story running through the comic to tie in the facts, or is it simply a sourcebook? - Kwenn 19:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- No, it's not a story. It's just pages of illustrations with captions introducing the characters, ships, etc. -- Ozzel
- Yet, as Legacy 0, it's included in the series. Considering every character will from the series will end up having Star Wars: Legacy as an appearance, why bother putting Legacy 0 as a source? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
20:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's called Legacy 0 because Star Wars Handbook: Legacy wouldn't get people interested in a new series. This is a reference book. A name (or number) doesn't change that. -- Ozzel 00:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yet, as Legacy 0, it's included in the series. Considering every character will from the series will end up having Star Wars: Legacy as an appearance, why bother putting Legacy 0 as a source? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- No, it's not a story. It's just pages of illustrations with captions introducing the characters, ships, etc. -- Ozzel
- Comics don't usually start at issue 0. I haven't read it, but is there any kind of story running through the comic to tie in the facts, or is it simply a sourcebook? - Kwenn 19:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- I gotta disagree. It's part of the Legacy series, but the issue itself is more of a reference book than a story. -- Ozzel 19:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
It is brilliant :)
