Canon Image
The image for this page is one from Legends. Shouldn't the picture be removed until we have a canonical picture from Rebels? Darth Ravigious (talk) 23:03, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Said picture also appeared in Ultimate Star Wars, which is a canon reference book. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:09, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
Sith holocron in general vs specific Sith holocron
It seems that the article, in its present form, mixes elements that pertain to Sith holocrons in general and elements that only pertain to the one appearing in Rebels. For example, I doubt that the Presence is in every Sith holocron. Shouldn't we create Sith holocron (Malachor) or something like that? --LelalMekha (talk) 18:06, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think the holocron in Rebels has been shown to possess enough individuality to warrant its own page. Cevan
(talk) 18:10, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
(SPOILERS for Star Wars Rebels episode "Visions and Voices")
In the most recent episode of Star Wars Rebels, Ezra claims that the Jedi and Sith holocrons were destroyed after the abrupt stopping of the holocron merger in "The Holocrons of Fate." However, we can clearly see that both devices are still intact - albeit scorched and without the triangle parts connected. The Sith holocron is even glowing a bit. I honestly think that the article should be changed to say that the holocron was left inoperable after the failed merger, since what Ezra is saying is contradicted by visual evidence from the same episode. Also, in "Holocrons of Fate," we can see both of the holocrons land intact, so they are clearly no destroyed.
Star Wars Resistance Season Two Trailer
Can the artifact obviously connected to the Sith be classified as a Holocron and be added to Appearances? EthSchDI 19:53, August 20, 2019
