Better picture is needed. Varas Halcyon
I know. Not only is the picture bad (as far as quality), the model Obsidian used for the Sith Marauder looks like the basic PC clothes colored red and black - and with a rather bad NPC head. As far as I know, there is no other, unless others have access to concept art type pics. As I was going off of Knights II, this is all that I came up with. Ahrotahn
- I suggest replacing it with an image of the Jedi Exile that has fallen to the Dark Side and looks like an Anti-Kavar. Using that image is just painful, and it's very obvious that its design is a game coding glitch. If you can, just take an image of the Exile in Dark Jedi Knight Robes, dual red Lightsabers, and claim that as Marauder. - Leon Loire, non-account
"The Jedi Exile faced a trial on Korriban, where she was confronted by a dark vision of herself as a Sith Marauder, alongside Darth Revan" sorry if this is messy but i don't remeber fighting a dark side version of the exile in the game, only revan, malak, kreia and bunch of random monsters and jedi. so is this statement fanon? Groode hdoge 02:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- The word 'confronted' might be a little strong, but as you walk into the room with the vision of Revan, if you look quickly enough you see a dark side version of yourself, which quickly vanishes. Though I wouldn't say it was definitely a sith marauder. The 95 Headhunter 22:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
THey suck I killed all of them with ease —Unsigned comment by 69.217.73.2 (talk • contribs)
- I don't quite get the "dark vision of herself as a Sith Marauder" either. This is never indicated. The only thing that we know is that it is labeled as a "Dark Jedi" and that it is a dark side manifestation of the Jedi Exile. But... a Sith Marauder? That's someone stretching their own ideas a little too far. I'm editing that last sentence and placing on the Dark Jedi page.--Master Dakari 19:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- It's actually not indicated in the story itself, but rather in the game's files. I looked into it, and the dark Exile apparation that appears (and dissapears) has its class set to Sith Maurader. I thought it was worth mentioning, since it's the ONLY time in the game that an NPC has a prestige class. Even the Jedi Masters, Sith Lords, and actual "Sith Maurader" enemies used one of the three regular Jedi classes. If not mentioned in the article itself, it's worth mentioning behind the scenes. Master Kavar 07:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's very interesting. But have you checked this on multiple game files, with the Exile set to a different clas each time? It may be that it corresponds to what you have set yourself to be. The 95 Headhunter (radio) (mission log) 21:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's actually not indicated in the story itself, but rather in the game's files. I looked into it, and the dark Exile apparation that appears (and dissapears) has its class set to Sith Maurader. I thought it was worth mentioning, since it's the ONLY time in the game that an NPC has a prestige class. Even the Jedi Masters, Sith Lords, and actual "Sith Maurader" enemies used one of the three regular Jedi classes. If not mentioned in the article itself, it's worth mentioning behind the scenes. Master Kavar 07:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't quite get the "dark vision of herself as a Sith Marauder" either. This is never indicated. The only thing that we know is that it is labeled as a "Dark Jedi" and that it is a dark side manifestation of the Jedi Exile. But... a Sith Marauder? That's someone stretching their own ideas a little too far. I'm editing that last sentence and placing on the Dark Jedi page.--Master Dakari 19:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
New Picture Suggestion
The new KOTOR Star Wars Miniatures set depicts the Sith Marauder as the Sith with the silver mask in KOTOR 2 (e.g. the three Sith in the tomb of Freedon Nadd). If there is a good picture of them out there, I suggest we use it. Sith Alchemy 101 21:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Model origins
Actually the model used for thos Sith Marauder is the one used for the citizens of Taris
Model origins
Actually the model used for those Sith Marauders is the one used for the citizens of Taris and Tatooine in KOTOR. They had simple heads, that couldn't move mouth. Not much detail, as You can see for yourself. I would say this was in a very poor taste for Obsidian to use such a model for this kind of enemies in KOTOR 2. Neterwan 09:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
TOR
Actually, SW Miniatures are just as cannon as any novel, or roleplaying game sourcebook. Who are you to dictate what is considered a source and what isn't? Who's to say a Sith Lord didn't just keep just mask? Very simple - every single individual who disembarked from the crashed shuttle was wearing the same kind of mask. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 18:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed, so stop edit warring. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 18:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- So, it's canon that a lightsaber blade is actually highly flexible, bending upon a slightest touch? That's exactly what SW Miniatures would lead anyone to believe... So the supposed similarity between the miniature and the Sith from the trailer (which, btw, I don't see here http://www.wizards.com/swminis/swm/KOTOR/sith_marauder.jpg at all) is not an argument. Neither is the fact that all these Sith wear the same kind of mask. We have no indication that they are Sith Marauders. Just multiple-similarily-robed-and-armoured-Sith. Masters, Adepts, Warriors, Acolytes, Apprentices and Assassins - all fit the bill equally well. To tell the truth, I fully expect them to *be* Sith Marauders. The point is: we don't know that for sure. Gorthuar 18:30, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- If toys weren't canon, then how did a toy provide a canon character's hairstyle? Also, you're not taking this seriously (as seen in your first few sentences there). --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 18:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- I am very serious about us having no indication that the Sith attacking the Jedi Temple are Marauders. Their supposed similarity to the miniature labeled "Sith Marauder" is not enough for me. Until the game designers reveal the trailers script, or indicate the nature of these Sith in some other manner, I shall oppose calling them "Sith Marauders". Gorthuar 19:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- If toys weren't canon, then how did a toy provide a canon character's hairstyle? Also, you're not taking this seriously (as seen in your first few sentences there). --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 18:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- So, it's canon that a lightsaber blade is actually highly flexible, bending upon a slightest touch? That's exactly what SW Miniatures would lead anyone to believe... So the supposed similarity between the miniature and the Sith from the trailer (which, btw, I don't see here http://www.wizards.com/swminis/swm/KOTOR/sith_marauder.jpg at all) is not an argument. Neither is the fact that all these Sith wear the same kind of mask. We have no indication that they are Sith Marauders. Just multiple-similarily-robed-and-armoured-Sith. Masters, Adepts, Warriors, Acolytes, Apprentices and Assassins - all fit the bill equally well. To tell the truth, I fully expect them to *be* Sith Marauders. The point is: we don't know that for sure. Gorthuar 18:30, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Juggernaut
Marauder and Juggernaut have been confirmed as Sith Warrior specializations in SW:TOR. Should there be a Sith Juggernaut article now? Ausir(talk) 19:50, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe eventually. We need to find out if there's a non-game mechanics distinction between the two. I'd say hold off for now. --Imperialles 20:17, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
much better picture
Is it possible to use the image in this [1] news article? It shows a Sith Marauder standing over the corpses of several republic soldiers, it's much better than the random civilian clothes picture used in the article now.
Here is a better link: http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/starwarstheoldrepublic/images/6264088/2/?full_size=1(- -) 11:18, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
Why would we use a picture of a Sith Warrior in the Sith Marauder article? - JMAS
Hey, it's me! 11:54, May 28, 2010 (UTC)- Done, much better. (- -) 01:36, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
