Talk: Second Battle of Geonosis/Legends

This is the talk page for the article "Second Battle of Geonosis/Legends." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Second Battle of Geonosis/Legends is a former Featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons it was removed.

"This point forward, we are entering uncharted territory." Second Battle of Geonosis/Legends is within the scope of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series, the related television series Star Wars: The Bad Batch and Tales, and related multimedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

This is part of the First Battle of Geonosis itself, not a completely different battle - \\Captain Kwenn// ^{— Ahoy!} 15:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

• Exactly. And it's of questionable canonity. Unit 8311 13:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Safe to say it's a different battle, so the "Second Battle of Geninosis" would be an approperiate name. Scripts released indicate that they are "Going Back" to Geinosis, so it's unlikely to be a continuation of the origonal battle. (Resources Cited: http://www.starwars.com/theclonewars/news20091103fd/index.html ) ((Note: I am unsure of how unused scripts fit into canonnity when it is referanced in the episode in question, so take it with a Grain of Salt)) Luke Danger 01:40, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

• November 2006. January 2007. Please take note of the dates these comments were posted. They are outdated and have no relevance to the current state of the article. -- I need a name (Complain here) 14:01, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

clones

• is cc-1004 or gree going to be at the 2nd battle of genosis because in a advertisement for season 2 it looked like he was but i am not sure jediskyguy 06:09, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
  • Are you asking this in the right place? That's the real question here. CC7567 ^(talk) 06:29, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Clone Numbers

In the strength figures we are told that there were at least 9 Acclamators and at least 6 Venators. Going by these numbers under clone trooper strength it should say at least 156,000. --86.151.199.12 12:32, November 21, 2009 (UTC)

• Maybe you are correct, and maybe you are not. That's why this is pure speculation and does not belong to this - or any other - article. Mauser^Comlink 12:40, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • NO DISRESPECT. How is this speculation? The info about the ships seems solid enough to be used and simple maths (9x16000)+ (6x2000) makes 156,000 very credible. --86.142.137.138 11:46, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
    • Do we know for sure that each ship carried that exact number of clones? Mauser^Comlink 11:49, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
      • Acclamator-class assault ship, Technical specifications, third from the bottom. Venator-class Star Destroyer Technical specifications, also third from the bottom. --86.142.137.138 12:00, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
        • That's not what I meant. I mean that we cannot know for sure if each ship at the battle of Geonosis carried the exact same number of clones - it could easily be less - and thus we should not add asumptions to the article. Mauser^Comlink 12:08, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
          • When you find an official source that indicates the Venators and the Acclamators carried the "usual" amount of trooper, you can add it to the article. --Xd1358 ^Talk 13:01, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
            • I now understand why this cannot be added. Sorry for wasting people's time. --86.131.219.230 19:18, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

Caltrop Field

In Ki Adi Mundi's biography, it had a link for a Caltrop field, which needed an article. I created one on caltops but wanted to correct the wording in this article so it has a link to "caltrop field", not caltrops. I was wondering if anyone would be willing to give me any recommendations for the wording of this sentence if I was to edit the article. Thanks!

Master Tej, May 10, 2011

• The sentence seems to be fine. :) CC7567 ^(talk) 03:11, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

2.2 Updated with new information

Number of clone battalions involved in the second battle of Geonosis

The 501st Legion wasn't the only Clone Battalion involved, the 212th Attack Battalion and another two battalions was involved with the battle

--60.242.192.189 14:55, September 3, 2012 (UTC)

• Which source is this coming from? CC7567 ^(talk) 15:42, September 3, 2012 (UTC)