Talk: Recusant-class light destroyer

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Recusant-class light destroyer."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

WP-TCW

"This point forward, we are entering uncharted territory."

Recusant-class light destroyer is within the scope of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series, the related television series Star Wars: The Bad Batch and Tales, and related multimedia.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Fighting for Your Independence

"And when their nominations are combined with yours, we shall have a project greater than any on Wookieepedia."

Recusant-class light destroyer is within the scope of WookieeProject Durge's Lance, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles relating to the Confederacy of Independent Systems.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can find out more about our mission, or even join yourself!

Why is this page necessary?

Isn't there already a page about this model here: Recusant-class light destroyer. So can this page be deleted?--172.250.250.99 23:22, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Mention in Tarkin

In chapter two of Tarkin, when one of the Imperials stationed at Sentinel Base is informing Tarkin and Cassel of what the rebels' ship is constructed from, they say, "...modules consistent with CIS Providence-, Recusant-, and Munificent-class warships." The Legends name for the Separatist Destroyer is the Recusant-class light destroyer; unfortunately in Tarkin, as the Imperial giving the report was listing off multiple CIS ships, they don't specify precisely what type of ship the Recusant-class is. I feel it'd be a bit of a waste to not update the page with it's true name as it was confirmed in canon, but there's the predicament of not having the full name. My question is how should we go about this, assuming we don't just leave it as "Separatist Destroyer?" Should we rename it just to "Recusant-class"; should we do "Recusant-class warship," as you could apply the "warship" at the end of the Imperial's sentence to the "Recusant-class;" should we merge "Separatist destroyer" and "Recusant-class" into "Recusant-class destroyer" since destroyer is part of both the canon and Legends name? I'm not entirely sure which route we should go myself, but I do think we should incorporate "Recusant-class" in the page name somehow. Cevan (talk) 01:40, February 3, 2015 (UTC)

  • I'd vote for "Recusant-class warship," myself. I'm surprised it hasn't already been moved, like the Munificent-class. Operative lm (talk) 07:11, March 5, 2015 (UTC)
    • That's what my vote goes towards as well. If no one has any objections, I say we move the page to "Recusant-class warship." Cevan (talk) 18:50, March 6, 2015 (UTC)