Of Canon & Continuity
I don't dispute that this is non-canon but who exactly agreed upon that point?--DannyBoy7783 01:53, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Leland Chee - QuentinGeorge 04:57, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks.--DannyBoy7783 05:34, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Could you add a link to that? --UVnet 16:08, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks.--DannyBoy7783 05:34, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Non-canon
Greetings, was wondering where is it that says Old Wounds is non-canon and part of Infinities. We also know that Darth Maul came alive in Star Wars Tales and was killed by Darth Vader. Also, Darth Maul's brain and spinal cord was found by some scientist and put off by Luke Skywalker. Which one or ones follow Maul's aftermath? —Unsigned comment by Battlemaster (talk • contribs)
- Yeah i think he should reconsider that since it seems extremely possible. Ugluk 02:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- I read this comic and the book it is collected in. the cover states (indirectly, by saying that the artists have been given "unlimited access to the star wars universe") that all content is canon. I am removing the "non-canon" tab from the top of the article. Besides if Luke could survive his fall in empire strikes back, Why can't Maul?Wilhelm screamer 01:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Because Leland Chee said so. Take a look at his comments here. --Borsk Fey'lya Talk 01:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is non-canon right now and will perhaps stay that way, look in Watto's bio, it says that he was alive after the destruction of Death Star I, and eventually retired and was replaced by W Wald. —Unsigned comment by 71.232.225.38 (talk • contribs)
- Because Leland Chee said so. Take a look at his comments here. --Borsk Fey'lya Talk 01:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I read this comic and the book it is collected in. the cover states (indirectly, by saying that the artists have been given "unlimited access to the star wars universe") that all content is canon. I am removing the "non-canon" tab from the top of the article. Besides if Luke could survive his fall in empire strikes back, Why can't Maul?Wilhelm screamer 01:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- its canonWallyx 21:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- If it's non-canon, let's place a non-canon tab again to the top of the article. If it's canon or arguably canon, let's mark it that way. And please don't forget to mark the related passage in Darth Maul article that way, too. The way it is right now makes no sense to me at all (no "arguably canon" mark at the top, but behind the scenes states it's arguably canon... and in Maul article it says non-canon...) --Chimealheltei 11:38, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
- additionally there's an Infinities timeline label at the top of the page. If it is considered canon or arguably canon, then Infinities makes no sense to me... --Chimealheltei 11:41, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
Just a note
If Maul is coming back in The Clone Wars looking not too different from this image, File:Visionaries Darth Maul.jpg, then at what level might the canon of this content be considered? We know Maul and Obi-Wan meet during the Clone Wars now, but Maul's appearance really doesn't seem to have changed. If I viewed the footage correctly, Maul has metal legs and long horns. Correct me if you're seeing something different. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:10, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Change to canon?
It was said to be non-canon in 2005, but then in 2006 it was referenced in a piece of material canon to Legends. Shouldn't the later material overrule the older statement in this case? --Doc Nef (talk) 23:21, May 28, 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think so. "The Story of General Grievous: Lord of War" doesn't directly reference the events of "Old Wounds;" it just implies that Maul survived the Clone Wars. - Cwedin(talk) 23:35, May 28, 2019 (UTC)
Couldn't we treat it like we do Star Wars Tales then? Placing it in the main body but with a template noting it's ambiguous canonicity. --Doc Nef (talk) 12:55, May 29, 2019 (UTC)