This article is not a stub. It contains all the available canon information about the item. (See Forum:Stub for more info.) I removed the stub tag and Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing put it back. What gives? Asithol 03:58, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, you could add information about where and when and by whom it was eaten. There appears to be at least four such occasions. --Eyrezer 11:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, yes, you could. But you can find trivial details about any entry that could be added. Yet it would be foolish to tag every entry as a stub just because of that. Perhaps the meaning of "stub" needs further clarification, but to me, it means there is essential, encyclopedic information available in the literature but missing from Wookieepedia. In this case, everything we know about what a muja muffin is, based on canonical sources, is included in the Wookieepedia entry.
Maybe this discussion should be moved to the Senate Hall, because it applies to a lot of entries besides just this one. Asithol 02:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, yes, you could. But you can find trivial details about any entry that could be added. Yet it would be foolish to tag every entry as a stub just because of that. Perhaps the meaning of "stub" needs further clarification, but to me, it means there is essential, encyclopedic information available in the literature but missing from Wookieepedia. In this case, everything we know about what a muja muffin is, based on canonical sources, is included in the Wookieepedia entry.