Talk: LEGO Star Wars: The Video Game

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "LEGO Star Wars: The Video Game."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

LucasArtsLogo

LEGO Star Wars: The Video Game is within the scope of WookieeProject Video Games, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating from any Star Wars video games.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

LegoClassicStarWars

Kick some brick in I through VI!

LEGO Star Wars: The Video Game is within the scope of WookieeProject: LEGO, an effort to develop and maintain in-universe and out-of-universe articles about LEGO-related Star Wars topics.

If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.

Analasis of each level

Could someone help me with an alalasis for each level, it's the one thing the page is lacking

Brisky 16:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Mistakes?

I think we can get rid of the "mistakes and inconsistencies" section. Most of those changes were made for comedic effect. Besides, they weren't made of plastic in the movies! -Milo Fett[Comlink] 23:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Sppeaking of the errors, is it just me, or does that blue "unknown" clone trooper look like a member of the 51st Leigon?Yoshimon 01:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

There is two mistakes in this topic and what were saying:

  1. 1- It's 501st Legion, not 51st Legion
  1. 2- It's really a Clone Trooper (Swamp) painted blue instead of green. Olsonman 03:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Ok, moving on, should we get rid of this section? -Milo Fett[Comlink] 14:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I guess so. Olsonman 14:33, 14 August 2007 (UCT)
    • I think we should keep it, it shows what was different, it does not matter why those things were different. It helps explain why the events in the game are considered non-canon. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
      • But it just kind of insults our readers' intelligence when we say why it's different. Do we really need a whole section talking about the difference in Jar Jar's posture in various scenes? In the movie, the actors were humans who talked. In the game, they are LEGOs who don't. End of story, in my opinion. -Milo Fett[Comlink] 00:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
  • What? Olsonman 14:34, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it seems like the "Differences between the movies" are like playing captain DUH. But I think it should be kept for purposes--o_OJdg50LegomasterO_o 21:02, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Trivia

Should a trivia section be added to this page? I know many things about this game that would be "interesting." Such as: This is the only Lego Starwars game to be rated E. (the others are rated E10+). Also, a majority of the minifigures in this game had not been created and still have yet tp be created in real life. Minifig-me, bOiNg!!![[File:CF kk slider.jpg|50px]] 20:46, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

  • We have a policy against trivia here on Wookieepedia. See WP:TRIVIA. OLIOSTER (talk) 20:48, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
    • We use Behind the Scenes.--Station7 20:50, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
      • Yes, I suppose I should clarify a bit. Our policy isn't against trivia itself, but against displaying the trivia is long lists full of short sentences. The policy page explains it more clearly. OLIOSTER (talk) 20:53, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't understand, no biggie. I can live without trivia on one wiki. Minifig-me, bOiNg!!![[File:CF kk slider.jpg|50px]] 23:37, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

"Tree Monster" in GBA version (and possible page split)

In the creatures part section of the appearances section, there is a mention of a "Tree Monster". There is no actual page for it, so it's a little confusing (especially as there are no notes about it either as comments or as edit summaries). It appears to be referring to a space slug-like creature in the first Naboo forest area that you can use the Force on to enter and get a Death Star plans thingy inside of. This isn't really a "tree" monster, though.
-SirYodaJedi (talk) 21:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

For reference, I believe you are referring to this. At any rate, I would argue that the GBA version should have it's own page, since we're not talking about a variation of the same video game, but a completely different product, only sharing the name and some gameplay concepts. NanoLuukeCloning facility 19:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, that was my guess as to what the listing is referring to.
I concur that the GBA version is significantly different enough to warrant its own page, although the only precedent I can find for doing a platform-specific article page is the SWE1R arcade port (even the GBC game is on the same page as the console version), so it leads into a larger can of worms (how different is different enough to warrant a separate article? Should Republic Heroes on DS have its own page, since the story is different? How about TFU on Wii/PS2/PSP, since there are more levels?) that should probably be dealt with elsewhere.
—SirYodaJedi (talk) 01:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)