Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "LEGO Star Wars: The Last Jedi in 2 Minutes."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Deletion

I fail to see how this is promotional material, yes it does have an ad at the end for TLJ but it is not blatant advertising. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 03:08, July 2, 2019 (UTC)

  • Its not a narrative or reference video, that would be better for the LEGO wiki. That video its just a promo recap, it would be like creating article about this arrested development recap, the promo video recap for the Clone Wars, or this LEGO TFA recap video. This is going to be deleted eventually--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:20, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
    • It still has some canonical value. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 03:33, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
      • As I said, its just a promo video like the others--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:36, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
        • If it was a promo video then it would promote something. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 03:43, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
          • The video's description is a promotion for TLJ's home video release. I agree with Ruiz, we don't really need an article for this. - Cwedin(talk) 03:49, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
            • Actually, that makes sense let's delete it. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 03:54, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
              • Actually we should keep this, we should probably make a TC page so this issue is more easily resolved. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 04:02, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
                • Its never been an issue before, promo videos are not an article material they're just a source (for in universe) or part of the bibliography (OOU)--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:06, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
                  • But this isn't really a promo video just a video that has promotion at the end. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 04:11, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
                      • Again, see the other examples, none of them have an article because they're not something notable to have. It would be like creating an article for a trailer just because it "has some canonical value"--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:14, July 2, 2019 (UTC)
                        • A trailer dosen't have any canonical value and its promotional anyway, we may aswell just resolve it in the trash compactor or we'd be here forever. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 04:16, July 2, 2019 (UTC)