Talk: Jek Lawquane

This is the talk page for the article "Jek Lawquane." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

"This point forward, we are entering uncharted territory." Jek Lawquane is within the scope of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series, the related television series Star Wars: The Bad Batch and Tales, and related multimedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Adopted?

I don't see any canon source to back up the claim that he and his sister were adopted by Cut, rather than being his biological offspring. Did I miss something in the episode itself? --Keiyakins (talk) 08:31, September 26, 2015 (UTC)

• There's no way Jek and Shaeeah are Cut's biological children; "The Deserter" takes place a year or so after the Battle of Geonosis, and both of Cut's children are obviously older than a year old. Cevan (talk) 18:16, September 26, 2015 (UTC)
  • Cut is 'obviously' older than 11 or 12, too. The fact that forced aging exists and was used on their father makes it hard to to accept supposition based on their age as fact. --Keiyakins (talk) 04:31, September 27, 2015 (UTC)
    • Even if Cut's children aged twice as fast like their father, they'd still have been older than they were. If they aged twice as quickly, they would only be about 2 years old, which they're both obviously older than. Cevan (talk) 14:25, September 27, 2015 (UTC)