Redirect question
Per The Joiner King, the Galactic Alliance's Inquisitors were responsible for investigating beings that sided with the Yuuzhan Vong during the war. Should we make Inquisitor a disambig page that points to Inquisitorius and Inquisitor (Galactic Alliance)? --SparqMan 07:10, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I agree. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 20:38, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Brakiss
What's the source for Brakiss being on this list? Eyrezer 20:40, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe there are sources for this. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:54, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- NEGTC for one, I think. But don't quote me on that. Tam 21:03, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Interesting Eyrezer 21:05, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I could always check if needed. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:08, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- NEGTC p. 31 says "Imperial reprogramming teams associated with the Inquisitorius took custody of Brakiss and turned him into their own weapon." However, that same page also indicates that the team was based on Msst, not Prakith, suggesting that it wasn't formally a part of the Inquisitorius structure. So, he might or might not have been a part of the Inquisitorius, depending on how you want to look at that information. jSarek 02:39, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Almost like what Kenobi said: "From a certain point of view." Admiral J. Nebulax 21:42, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- NEGTC p. 31 says "Imperial reprogramming teams associated with the Inquisitorius took custody of Brakiss and turned him into their own weapon." However, that same page also indicates that the team was based on Msst, not Prakith, suggesting that it wasn't formally a part of the Inquisitorius structure. So, he might or might not have been a part of the Inquisitorius, depending on how you want to look at that information. jSarek 02:39, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I could always check if needed. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:08, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Interesting Eyrezer 21:05, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- NEGTC for one, I think. But don't quote me on that. Tam 21:03, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Vader
While Vader is not technically an inquisitor, Evasive Action: Recruitment makes it pretty clear he controls the Inquisitorius. Ideas for how to include this?
- Perhaps putting it in like "Controlled by Darth Vader, these Inquisitors..." Admiral J. Nebulax 20:47, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Nice
- Thank you. Admiral J. Nebulax 23:42, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Nice
Return of the Jedi
I have a question regarding a possible addition to the Appearances section. Do the Inquisitors appear in Return of the Jedi? After Vader appears on the Death Star, and the Emperor directs him to go back "to the command ship," Sidious turns to two individuals. These people look a lot like Inquisitors, at least in clothing, and I've always wondered who they were. Any thoughts?
- Those are actually Palpatine's Imperial Advisors. --Danik Kreldin 07:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- One is Sate Pestage, the Grand Vizier of the Empire, but no Inquisitors. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Agent (job)
- Do we really need this linked? Could we really make a decent article out of this, given how nebulous the "job" is? jSarek 01:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I think it's necessary. There were many types of agents in the Star Wars Galaxy. Maybe the link shouldn't be "Agent (job)", but I believe an article should be made on it. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
19:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, tha'ts kind of my point . . . there are many types of agents, most of which had little to nothing similar in their job descriptions, and most of which work for entities whose areas of concern are already covered by their respective articles (e.g. what does an Imperial Intelligence Adjustments Agent do? Well, he does one of the tasks described in Adjustments). jSarek 21:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I mean the general agent—an information gather. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
22:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I mean the general agent—an information gather. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Well, tha'ts kind of my point . . . there are many types of agents, most of which had little to nothing similar in their job descriptions, and most of which work for entities whose areas of concern are already covered by their respective articles (e.g. what does an Imperial Intelligence Adjustments Agent do? Well, he does one of the tasks described in Adjustments). jSarek 21:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I think it's necessary. There were many types of agents in the Star Wars Galaxy. Maybe the link shouldn't be "Agent (job)", but I believe an article should be made on it. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
Vader or Emperor
Was reading this and was wondering: They were controlled by Vader, but they answered directly to the emperor? I understand that Vader was the sort of the Emperor's voice to underlings, but then shouldn't the article state that they answered directly to vader?
- Why? Unless you have a source to back you up, I see no reason to change it. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
01:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Let me refrase the question, The first sentance of the second paragraph in the article says the inquisitors were controlled by Darth Vader. The last sentance of the second paragraph says "They reported directly to Emperor Palpatine". Now, if they reported to Palpatine, wouldn't they also be controlled by him? Or if they were controlled by Vader, wouldn't they report directly to him? --Eggzavier 03:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- You can be under one's control yet report to someone else. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
12:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think we need some variation on what Galaxy Guide 9 has to say about High Inquisitor Tremayne: "He is answerable only to the Emperor, Lord Darth Vader, the highest echelons of the Inquisitorius and the most respected of the Emperor's advisors." jSarek 23:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps what that line means is that the Inquisitors could answer directly to Palpatine, if need be. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
01:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps what that line means is that the Inquisitors could answer directly to Palpatine, if need be. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I think we need some variation on what Galaxy Guide 9 has to say about High Inquisitor Tremayne: "He is answerable only to the Emperor, Lord Darth Vader, the highest echelons of the Inquisitorius and the most respected of the Emperor's advisors." jSarek 23:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- You can be under one's control yet report to someone else. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Let me refrase the question, The first sentance of the second paragraph in the article says the inquisitors were controlled by Darth Vader. The last sentance of the second paragraph says "They reported directly to Emperor Palpatine". Now, if they reported to Palpatine, wouldn't they also be controlled by him? Or if they were controlled by Vader, wouldn't they report directly to him? --Eggzavier 03:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
List of Jedis killed
How about including a list of the Jedis who were actually killed by the Inquisitors? I would do so, but I don't got the sources --The IP
- That would be more appropriate for the individual Inquisitor articles, but even then I don't think a list would be necessary. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
11:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Head Inquisitor vs Grand Inquisitor
Is there any significane to the fact that Malorum and Hydra are called "Head Inquisitor" whereas Laddinare and the spiky-head are called "Grand Inquisitor"
- On Malorum and Hydra's talk pages it has been debated and agreed that "Head Inquisitor" was just the early name for the title "Grand Inquisitor" given they serve pretty much the same purpose, being the top ranking position in the Inquisitorius and leading them. GREATRJ1 (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Inquisitorius/Inquisitorius
The Inquisitorius should get this article to Featured Article status as their namesake is a bit lacking in quality and it would also be slightly funny in a strange kind of way --Tom rules 21:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Inquisitorium Dark Trooper
Shouldn't there be something stating the Inquisitorium Dark Trooper in here? User:Jangofett.avenger
Quote
Gee, this seems familiar. Isn't it based off of "Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition"?—B-Boba Fett! He'll kill us all!
19:43, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind, I must have scrolled down too fast.—B-Boba Fett! He'll kill us all!
19:45, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
SWTOR
If the "Sith Inquisitor" was established in the rule of Palpatine, why in this new MMO is there a class of such name? It bears a striking resemblance to what is mentioned in this article; dark Force powers, excessive use of such things, and little-to even no-lightsaber combat. Also, this game takes place 3,000-3,500 years before DV was commanded with "My Lord". Please, someone, explain this! Is it a Bioware fail or did someone do his/her research wrong? Or, is it George Lucas's fault somehow?
The Inquisitorius are not the same thing as the "Sith Inquisitor" clas in SW:TOR. They just have a similar name. 04:21, March 5, 2012 (UTC)Scholic_M
Canon article
In Rebels the is a character called The Inquisitor, and now the Season Two trailer shows at least two more of them will be appearing, thus I feel a cannon article will be necessary but there doesn't seem an official name for the organisation yet.
- Then wait. If there is a canon Inquisitorius, we'll eventually find out about it. And if, in canon, there are just several independent Inquisitors, then we will have avoided creating a bogus article out of supposition and impatience. jSarek (talk) 23:29, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
Inquisitorius
When I first came across the inquisitors after reading what they were involved in within the Hero's guide. I assumed and therefore thought plausible that the agents who formed the order specialized in hunting and exterminating Force-users, being endowed with considerable intelligence. Giving way to the implication that each member held an aptitude in individual unseen or unknown abilities that acted as an antithesis towards organizations that were targeted, thus making them the optimal choice for deployment. But from reading the biography behind their members and their roles in the Empire's operations - says these individuals were adept at interrogation rather than extermination when the need arrises. This insinuates that these aren't the inquisitors that killed most of the neo-gen Matukai (as none of them meet the prerequisites for finding one - let alone capturing one). So I guess this means they have yet to reveal the real members of Inquisitorius, since the ones we see are not in keeping with the criteria in which they were implied and conceptualized.
Again - don't approach this in a confrontational sense. I'm only taking into context the information given and comparing it to what was ignorantly written. If any here have quotes regarding their prowess to shed enlightenment on the subject - please do so. Because considering the information generalized as to what an inquisitor exemplifies - shows that these agents aren't all that superior when compared to fully-trained Jedi Knights. Like the Imperial Knights, they aren't living up to what they're seen to be.--Yashuvoo Sommin (talk) 20:55, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
Outranking the Hand?
Eh?...What source says the Inquisitorius outrank the Emperor's Hand?Wolfscar45 (talk) 20:28, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
Missing members And members who should not be included.
As someone who has been researching the Legends Inquisition for a good while now I have found five Inquisitors not listed and three Inquisitors who are listed who shouldn't be. Unless there is other information out there about these three then feel free to prove me wrong.
I'll start with who should be removed. Having read Uhl Eharl Khoehng, Vialco is only ever referred to as a Dark Jedi. This goes for both the story and his sidebar. Same goes with Jaalib Brandl, he is only ever referred to as a Dark Jedi from my understanding. I am aware those two have had mentions in Sourcebooks in that case I'd like to hear if they are referred to as Apprentice Inquisitors in there. As from what I can tell, they are just labled as Inquisitors here because they were trained by other Inquisitors. Now this one is complete non sense based on what I've seen. Now I'll admit I did add Misha Vekkian to the list, before understanding she wasn't an Inquisitor, her page also lists her as an Inquisitor. However, her only ever appearance and mention which is the A Reckoning of Wraiths campaign inside of Dawn of Defiance never lists her as an Inquisitor only a Human Jedi who is a Lieutenant. So really she should just be labled a Dark Jedi.
With that out of the way I'll go over the five Legends Inquisitors that are not featured. Now these four have no identification, however, the Canon page features unnamed Inquisitors so why not the Legends page? These Inquisitors are as follows. The Inquisitor featured in an illustration in the Force Unleashed Campaign Guide, the female zabrak Inquisitor from the Star Wars: Galaxies Trading Card Game (The card is called Imperial Inquisitor), another Imperial Inquisitor featured in Star Wars: The Card Game, more specifically the Heroes and Legends from the first Force Pack of the Echoes of the Force Cycle (again his or her card is called Imperial Inquisitor), another Inquisitor from an illustration in the Dark Side Sourcebook which is another image used on the page yet he does not have an article, and finally an Inquisitor from Savage Spirits. Now the Savage Spirits Inquisitor does have a Canon page (labled Unidentified Inquisitor (Karalle)) but does not have a Legends page despite their story being both Canon and Legends. There is always the chance of more popping up so I will keep this updated if I find more. I have images of four of these five Inquisitors. I do not have one of the Savage Spirits Inquisitor as I don't think they ever had an appearance. -- GREATRJ1 18:29, February 23rd 2025 (GMT)
- You're welcome to make changes to the page if you think any should be removed or added. The Savage Spirits one probably just needs to be made, so again if you want to make it then feel free to do Lewisr (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have made the changes, however, the Legends Page for the Savage Spirits Inquisitor (listed as the Karelle Inquisitor) shall have to have a Legends page created. The other unidentified Inquisitors will need pages to. I'll leave that to someone who knows how to do page creation. Thank you for your time. -- GREATRJ1 14:45 February 24th 2025 (GMT)
