Isn't this...?
The Imperial Interdictor isn't a sort of canon version of the (Legends) Interdictor-class Star Destroyer?
--Aledownload (talk) 12:36, June 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Given its appearance, it's more likely a canon version of the Immobilizer 418 cruiser. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:04, June 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Right.--Aledownload (talk) 19:14, June 24, 2016 (UTC)
Given that it fits a CR-90 into its belly hangar in Stealth Strike, and a CR-90 is at least 126m (On the Front Lines) and possibly 150 m (upcoming Rebel Files) then it logically cannot be 600m.
I did comparisons using the fact that the hangars are the same size on this and the ISD - and (using Armada models of this ship and the ISD), I got, for a 1600m ISD, a hangar length of around 190 m. The Interdictor is 6.4x the length of its belly hangar - so, just over 1200m long. --2A00:23C5:B7CA:5100:C3C:E7C4:FB8E:9264 21:20, November 4, 2017 (UTC)
- It's confirmed that it's formal name is Interdictor-class Star Destroyer, but is also called an Immobilier 418 cruiser.--Vitus Infinitus (talk) 21:39, November 4, 2017 (UTC)
Until Matt Martin clarifies how a 600m ship can fit a 150m corvette into its hangar bay (the ones in Zero Hour are the same size as the one in Stealth Strike, so it isn't just that one episode) - I think the ship should be presumed to be a prototype of the "Star Destroyers with interdiction field generators" that replaced the Immobilizer. --2A00:23C5:B7CA:5100:6903:9841:F067:8CF6 19:04, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
Named?
The Star Wars: Card Trader No set defined! identifies this ship by name. The Interdictor. As is common, the Interdictor-class would have been named after this prototype. Should this page be merged into Interdictor (Interdictor-class Star Destroyer)? - JMAS
Hey, it's me! 21:04, August 2, 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see any indication that the ship on the card is the one from Stealth Strike. There were other Interdictors in the show, we shouldn’t be assuming the ship on the card is this vessel. Tommy-Macaroni 21:50, August 2, 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, nevermind. Clearly didn't think that one through long enough. - JMAS
Hey, it's me! 23:12, August 2, 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, nevermind. Clearly didn't think that one through long enough. - JMAS