Talk: INT-4 Interceptor/Legends

This is the talk page for the article "INT-4 Interceptor/Legends." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

INT-4 Interceptor/Legends has been listed as a Comprehensive article, which means it has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wookieepedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved in line with Wookieepedia's policies, please feel free to contribute.

"We do not require glory, only status articles for our Emperor." INT-4 Interceptor/Legends is within the scope of WookieeProject Ambition, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles relating to the Galactic Empire. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can find out more about our mission, or even join yourself!

Is this really cannon? --Admiral06 06:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

• I'd like to think not. But (sometimes unfortunately), it seems that toys are considered canon in general. Red XIV 08:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Reading our Hosrel article, it mentions the fighters there attacking an Oswaft. Did they also attack the MF at one point, which seems to be what is depicted on the coverJustinGann 09:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
• The fact that Lucasfilms licenced the toy makes it cannon. Blame them. :shrug:174.25.34.44 04:05, June 7, 2010 (UTC)A REDDSON

Atmo or space?

The info box says this is an atmospheric repulsorcraft fighter, and provides a source. The text says a spacecraft, and does not provide a source. Should the latter info be removed?JustinGann 03:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

I was going to bring that up actually. Repulsorcraft can't function in space because they work against things like Gravity, and ground. There's neither of those in space. I would assume one is wrong.--Allurade Dendra 01:50, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

5.3 Factual correction

I do not believe for one second that the INT-4 was space capable and that the vehicles in question on the book cover are not at all related to this vehicle.

http://www.battlegrip.com/?p=2292

This is a link to a review of the toy in question and provides pictures for you to look at. As you can see the vehicle is TINY, and the engines it would have had (were there any space to actually have engines where they say they should be on the vehicle) would have have been far to weak to break out of the atmosphere. Most likely this was a light combat airspeeder. --71.59.140.42 22:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

• The only information on this platform comes from the box the toy comes from and the image on the cover of Star Cave. It ‘appears’ similar, and doesn’t appear to be mentioned anywhere else. (There’s actually a VERY brief view of them at the Battle of Hoth, but that sequence is as clear as mud.) This is unfortunately retcon (which is a dirty word to those of us who have to fix the messes), so we have to do the best we can. Sorry… Blame Lucasfilm. :shrug:174.25.34.44 04:05, June 7, 2010 (UTC)A REDDSON

Image

Can no one find a better image? This one is so tiny & blurred that it makes my frikkin eyes bleed.--Bosda Di'Chi 13:54, November 3, 2011 (UTC)