Talk: Ephant Mon/Legends

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Ephant Mon/Legends."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

FA-Former

Ephant Mon/Legends is a former Featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
June 8, 2007 Featured article nomination Success
July 9, 2007 Featured article by AdmirableAckbar
September 24, 2007 Featured article review Kept
October 21, 2007 Featured article
September 7, 2008 Featured article review Removed
October 12, 2008 Former Featured article
Current status: Former Featured article

Nominated

This can't be a nomination! Now, it must be pulled. I'm sorry, but it just can't be the best this wiki can offer. Jediknight19bby 16:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

  • 1) Do not remove the FA nomination tag from an article. 2) No offense, but someone who spends the majority of their time on their userpage and still has it come out like that probably shouldn't be talking about quality pages. Kuralyov 16:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, please do not remove nom tags. Removing the tag does not remove its nomination. If you feel it is not the best the wiki has to offer, go to the article's FA nomination page and voice your opinion on what needs to be improved. Wildyoda 16:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • There's so much that has to be improved! Atarumaster88 (at least I think it was him) said so himself. It's now a nom. for next week's improvement drive.
  • "If only Atarumaster88 were here. I could use his help." "Atarumaster88 would never help you." Jediknight19bby 16:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
    • to Jediknight19bby, please state which rules for FA the article violates. As someone who has worked hard on this article in the last week (okay, i admit it's not perfect, but still a lot of hard work), i'm disgusted that YOU have nominated it for the improvement drive, especially since you're a user whose only conrtibutions are to your user page and a fanon page (founding jedi) AdmirableAckbar 23:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
      • If it makes you feel better, Ozzel used it too. I just can't bare to see a redlink that has a canon story behind it. You deleted it, didn't you? It used to violate 3, 6, 9, 12, and 17. Jediknight19bby 15:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
        • Ozzel used what too? And only admins can delete things, so calm down and stop blaming AdmirableAckbar. Like I said in the forum, just look it up in the log. And nominating this for ID after it was nominated for GA kinda violates WP:POINT. Someone please just state what needs to be taken care of that you currently object to or be BOLD and fix it yourself. Wildyoda 17:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
        • Yes, Ozzel used what too? -- Ozzel 20:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
          • i think he means you mentioned the founding jedi in an article. he clicked on the redlink and created the page AdmirableAckbar 21:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

pics

until the main picture is sourced i'm going to replace it with the one with crumb on his shoulder. AdmirableAckbar 23:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

More Sources

while I am the main driving force behind this project (although certainly not the only one), i only have limited sources (tales from jabba's palace, dtabank, prelude to rebellion & EGTC), but many people have objected to this article being FA, citing rules 3, 9 & 11. Could anyone with any of the other sources listed (who's who in jabba's palace, star wars encyclopedia, EGTAS, galaxy guides 5 & 12) add any additional information (and reference it) AdmirableAckbar 20:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Infobox Photo

Is there a reason why the maquette created for the character is his infobox photo and not placed in the bts section? Skifffy (talk) 03:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)