Talk: Duel on Utapau

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Duel on Utapau."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Merge with Battle of Utapau

I feel that this event should be considered a part of the larger Battle of Utapau rather than a separate duel. Therefore, I propose merging and redirecting it into said article. - Angel BlueJedi Order(Holonet) 00:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Vote

For

  1. Angel BlueJedi Order(Holonet) 00:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  2. Imp 00:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  3. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  4. Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 20:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  5. Still a part of the Battle of Utapau. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 22:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  6. Jedi Dude 22:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  7. In light of the new information obtained by Imp i say merge MERGE! Ugluk: Destroyer of RedlinksWhine Here 22:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  8. Make it so. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 04:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  9. Yes, it should be merged. It will be a way to synthesize one fact and make it more comprehensible. Go ahead with the merging. Battle Surgeon talk
  10. Like, yeah, for sure! The two are pretty much the same. Asploder

Against

# Sorry but they are two different fights. Ugluk: Destroyer of RedlinksWhine Here 00:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

  1. Yes, that is true.--IG-Prime(Sentience Core)CIS roundel 11:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

They're not really different fights, they are parts of the same battle, in the same way that the duel on Invisible Hand was part of the Second Battle of Coruscant. - Angel BlueJedi Order(Holonet) 01:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

  • And the same way the duel on Naboo was part of the Second Battle of Theed.--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 20:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • That is a wrong thing to do, and I say all duels should have their own articles, and not part of a larger battle. Why is Duel in Palpatine's office not part of order 66, or the Jedi Purge? This would explain the low number of duel articles. Almost all duels are part of a larger battle. This method of thinking is clearly flawed, you must see the reason of my thinking.--IG-Prime(Sentience Core)CIS roundel 22:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
    • That doesn't mean we have to agree with it. When a duel is a part of a larger battle, it should be merged; when a duel isn't a part of a battle, it can't be merged since it would have no place to go to. The Duel in the Chancellor's Office is an example of this. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 22:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
      • Yes, but it makes no sense. I suppose I can't outdo you all, so since I cannot persuade you, nor outnumber, or overwhelm you, I will just have to accept you, for the time being.--IG-Prime(Sentience Core)CIS roundel 01:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
        • What exactly doesn't make sense? I don't see why duels that are part of a larger battle shouldn't be merged with that battle. - Angel Blue (Holonet) 01:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
          • Since it's been about a week, should I go ahead and merge? - Angel Blue (Holonet) 17:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
    • uh huh Jedi Dude 23:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)