Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Darth Wyyrlok (III)."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

WookieeProject Legacy Era

Darth Wyyrlok (III) is within the scope of WookieeProject Legacy Era, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles with topics appearing in the Star Wars: Legacy of the Force series, the Fate of the Jedi series, and the Star Wars: Legacy comic series.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

FA-Former

Darth Wyyrlok (III) is a former Featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
June 25, 2008 Featured article nomination Success
August 22, 2008 Featured article by Thefourdotelipsis
August 2, 2009 Featured article review Kept
September 6, 2009 Featured article
October 11, 2009 Featured article review Removed
December 20, 2009 Former Featured article
Current status: Former Featured article

Repeated names

So, now not only are the Sith picking lame names, they're repeating them? Tocneppil 06:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

That's quite interesting actually - do you think it's to try and legimimise the "there must always be a Darth Traya" idea? I know that there are a few who believe that Jacen is going to become "Darth Traya"... ;) (217.135.164.216 13:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC))
  • I don't know. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 13:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Think it's a question of the writers having lost their sense of creativity. KEJ 16:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Maybe its a Chagrian thing. Actually quite interesting, so don't be too hard on Ostrander. So does this mean we have or need a Darth Wyyrlok II and Darth Wyyrlok I? -- Riffsyphon1024 23:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Perhaps First Darth Wyyrlok and Second Darth Wyyrlok instead? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 23:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
      • Yes that would work. We would have to say that they were mentioned only, and they wouldn't have much to say about them, unless we conjectured something which we can't do. We might need to wait a little more for an in story reference, perhaps he has pictures of them on his countertop. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
        • Perhaps... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 23:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
          • I actually thought that as soon as I read the "third to bear the name" thing. I agree. But i think maybe "Darth Wyyrlok (first)" and etc..... But either way I support it. Lonnyd 06:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
            • The reason I think that it should be the way I suggested is because I don't think it should sound like the second one was the first one's son and so on, unless that ends up being the case. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 13:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
              • I thought it over, I thinkof the three presented here, we should use Riff's one. Just because they are numbered like that doesn't mean they were a line of fathers and sons, look at various nobility here on earth, or the popes. Lonnyd 21:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Possibly a clone of himself and simply inherited the name?

Title

This really shouldn't be at Darth Wyyrlock III, seeing as how he's never called that. It's amazing how many people on message boards think that the "III" is part of his name because of this. I propose just moving it to Darth Wyyrlok. Or if people think that the fact that he's the third should be mentioned in the title, then do it in the usual disambiguating way, like Darth Wyyrlok (third). The problem with this particular one is that it suggests that "III" is really a part of his name, which isn't the case. - Lord Hydronium 03:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

  • I've actually been thinking that lately. It does imply that it is his title. But I do think It should be something like Darth Wyyrlok (third). We may get info on those other two as of yet. It was important enough to put in his issue 0 bio. Lonnyd 03:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
    • I disagree. I think this is fine. There were three Darth Wyyrloks, meaning this is Darth Wyyrlok III. It's like saying John Smith I, John Smith II, and John Smith III. The third person doesn't always have to be called "(name) the Third". Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 18:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Whenever I read the name, I think that it sounds like a word you would find in the Shyriiwook language.--Darth Oblivion 00:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Could be... It does look like Shyriiwook. However, it's just speculation. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 00:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
      • I think we should change the title of the article, but merely by putting it like this:
Darth Wyyrlok (III)
Just like that, after all, he's just called "Darth Wyyrlok", and he will probably be called just like that, the "III" should merely be in parenthesis to indicate that he is the third, but it's not the same sort of system as, say, Pope names, which includes the number in the name--Sauron18 00:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Im really happy Darth Wyyrlok will be the new regent of the Sith, I think he is a far stronger leader than his former master... In my eyes he might even get stronger than Palpatine himself. His thouths of uniting the whole universe under the sith banner, is really a remarcable plan... --Thrawn Du Gard 22:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Picture

Does anybody else think we should change the picture back and have the B&W image in the infobox. It's a much better image and doesn't look so "cartoon'y" Jasca Ducato Sith Council (Sith campaign) 18:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

DarthWyryWhatever

Why do they ALL look like Darth Maul +_+ lalala_la

  • It's only the tatoos. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 13:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
    • You know, one of these days, we'll find out that there was a Zabrak Sith Lord that was tattooed just like all these guys who decided to go back in time to train under the all-powerful Darth Sidious. Except for unknown reasons he was never heard from again.... Lalala la 21:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Chagrian

It's interesting to note that the page on Chagrians states that they are relatively free of personal greed, and that it is Darth Wyyrlok that Krayt trusts, rather than any of the other Sith. BTS maybe?--Erl

Why

Does any one here know why Wyyrlok killed his master? they never explained it in the comic.--99.13.118.232 23:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

  • I think he killed him because as Wyyrlok dueled Andeddu he understanded that the sith alway search power. Killing his master he won the title of emperor (not oficialy), its the biggest power in the galaxy. Der3000er 18:02, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Darth Wyyrlok's Personality and traits

Clearly the Personality and Traits Section needs to be reworked as Wyyrlok showed no regret in his execution of Krayt.Perhaps he is even ambitious...Unsigned comment by 173.17.248.153 (talk • contribs)

Dark Lord of the Sith?

Should Wyyrlok be classified as the Dark Lord of the Sith even though he hasn't publicly taken the title? I mean, he is the leader of the Sith now that Krayt is dead.

Dark lord of the sith

It hasn't been confirmed yet that he is dark lord of the sith even though on Tatooine Part 3 it says the sith are placing someone new on the throne.

What comic arc will it be confirmed that he is crowned dark lord of the sith?

(JM2008)

Date of Death

In War Sazen said its been a year since he met up with cade at the beginning of the series. The TPB for Extremes says the year for Extremes on is 138 ABY. Therefor (Ha!) I am changing the date of death to 138 AbY as well as the deaths in Extremes.--The Great and Grand Count Mall! 23:19, December 15, 2010 (UTC)