Repeated names
So, now not only are the Sith picking lame names, they're repeating them? Tocneppil 06:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- They've apparently lost their creativity. Or, it's in honor of the previous Darth Wyyrloks. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
12:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- That's quite interesting actually - do you think it's to try and legimimise the "there must always be a Darth Traya" idea? I know that there are a few who believe that Jacen is going to become "Darth Traya"... ;) (217.135.164.216 13:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC))
- I don't know. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
13:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Think it's a question of the writers having lost their sense of creativity. KEJ 16:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Along with their entire sense of canon... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
17:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Along with their entire sense of canon... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Maybe its a Chagrian thing. Actually quite interesting, so don't be too hard on Ostrander. So does this mean we have or need a Darth Wyyrlok II and Darth Wyyrlok I? -- Riffsyphon1024 23:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps First Darth Wyyrlok and Second Darth Wyyrlok instead? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
23:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes that would work. We would have to say that they were mentioned only, and they wouldn't have much to say about them, unless we conjectured something which we can't do. We might need to wait a little more for an in story reference, perhaps he has pictures of them on his countertop. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
23:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- I actually thought that as soon as I read the "third to bear the name" thing. I agree. But i think maybe "Darth Wyyrlok (first)" and etc..... But either way I support it. Lonnyd 06:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- The reason I think that it should be the way I suggested is because I don't think it should sound like the second one was the first one's son and so on, unless that ends up being the case. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
13:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- I thought it over, I thinkof the three presented here, we should use Riff's one. Just because they are numbered like that doesn't mean they were a line of fathers and sons, look at various nobility here on earth, or the popes. Lonnyd 21:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- True... Well, as long as there are articles for them, I'm fine with it. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
22:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- True... Well, as long as there are articles for them, I'm fine with it. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I thought it over, I thinkof the three presented here, we should use Riff's one. Just because they are numbered like that doesn't mean they were a line of fathers and sons, look at various nobility here on earth, or the popes. Lonnyd 21:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- The reason I think that it should be the way I suggested is because I don't think it should sound like the second one was the first one's son and so on, unless that ends up being the case. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I actually thought that as soon as I read the "third to bear the name" thing. I agree. But i think maybe "Darth Wyyrlok (first)" and etc..... But either way I support it. Lonnyd 06:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Yes that would work. We would have to say that they were mentioned only, and they wouldn't have much to say about them, unless we conjectured something which we can't do. We might need to wait a little more for an in story reference, perhaps he has pictures of them on his countertop. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps First Darth Wyyrlok and Second Darth Wyyrlok instead? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Possibly a clone of himself and simply inherited the name?
- I don't think so. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
11:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Crazy thought - Is Mas Amedda a previous Darth Wyyrlok? He kind of seems to serve the same function within Palpatine's regime as Wyyrlok does in Krayt's. I know, rule of two and all, but maybe he was an honorary Darth or something, or interim Darth between Maul, Tyrannus and Vader. Lonnyd 09:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- I really doubt it. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
12:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- I really doubt it. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Crazy thought - Is Mas Amedda a previous Darth Wyyrlok? He kind of seems to serve the same function within Palpatine's regime as Wyyrlok does in Krayt's. I know, rule of two and all, but maybe he was an honorary Darth or something, or interim Darth between Maul, Tyrannus and Vader. Lonnyd 09:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
Title
This really shouldn't be at Darth Wyyrlock III, seeing as how he's never called that. It's amazing how many people on message boards think that the "III" is part of his name because of this. I propose just moving it to Darth Wyyrlok. Or if people think that the fact that he's the third should be mentioned in the title, then do it in the usual disambiguating way, like Darth Wyyrlok (third). The problem with this particular one is that it suggests that "III" is really a part of his name, which isn't the case. - Lord Hydronium 03:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've actually been thinking that lately. It does imply that it is his title. But I do think It should be something like Darth Wyyrlok (third). We may get info on those other two as of yet. It was important enough to put in his issue 0 bio. Lonnyd 03:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think this is fine. There were three Darth Wyyrloks, meaning this is Darth Wyyrlok III. It's like saying John Smith I, John Smith II, and John Smith III. The third person doesn't always have to be called "(name) the Third". Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
18:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think this is fine. There were three Darth Wyyrloks, meaning this is Darth Wyyrlok III. It's like saying John Smith I, John Smith II, and John Smith III. The third person doesn't always have to be called "(name) the Third". Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Whenever I read the name, I think that it sounds like a word you would find in the Shyriiwook language.--Darth Oblivion 00:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Could be... It does look like Shyriiwook. However, it's just speculation. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
00:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think we should change the title of the article, but merely by putting it like this:
- Could be... It does look like Shyriiwook. However, it's just speculation. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Darth Wyyrlok (III)
- Just like that, after all, he's just called "Darth Wyyrlok", and he will probably be called just like that, the "III" should merely be in parenthesis to indicate that he is the third, but it's not the same sort of system as, say, Pope names, which includes the number in the name--Sauron18 00:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I also don't really see the need for the "III" -LtNOWIS 00:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think we should use Sauron18's suggestion. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
00:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I like Sauron18's idea. It's like the way IMDB disambiguates people with the same name (like the 44 John Smiths), which is a sensible system. -- Darth Culator 00:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- It could also be used for Darth Wyyrloks I and II, as well as Fels I and II. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
00:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm going to make the Darth Wyyrlok (III) and Fel (I) moves later today unless someone objects. Lonnyd 22:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose there will also be a Fel (II) article, then. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
00:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Marvel comics has done this with their Official Handbook -they've got plenty of characters (six Captain Americas at last count) with Roman numerals.Tocneppil 04:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- So, will there also be a Darth Wyyrlok (I) and Darth Wyyrlok (II)? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
11:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
11:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- So, will there also be a Darth Wyyrlok (I) and Darth Wyyrlok (II)? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Marvel comics has done this with their Official Handbook -they've got plenty of characters (six Captain Americas at last count) with Roman numerals.Tocneppil 04:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose there will also be a Fel (II) article, then. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I'm going to make the Darth Wyyrlok (III) and Fel (I) moves later today unless someone objects. Lonnyd 22:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- It could also be used for Darth Wyyrloks I and II, as well as Fels I and II. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I like Sauron18's idea. It's like the way IMDB disambiguates people with the same name (like the 44 John Smiths), which is a sensible system. -- Darth Culator 00:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think we should use Sauron18's suggestion. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Im really happy Darth Wyyrlok will be the new regent of the Sith, I think he is a far stronger leader than his former master... In my eyes he might even get stronger than Palpatine himself. His thouths of uniting the whole universe under the sith banner, is really a remarcable plan... --Thrawn Du Gard 22:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Picture
Does anybody else think we should change the picture back and have the B&W image in the infobox. It's a much better image and doesn't look so "cartoon'y" Jasca Ducato Sith Council (Sith campaign) 18:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- "B&W image"? What do you mean? Plus, I think the current picture is fine. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
18:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Black & White. Yea, but he lloks like he's made out plastic. I think it should be changed. And befoe you say "no, we're not doing that" i wan ther people's opinions. Jasca Ducato Sith Council (Sith campaign) 12:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- You mean this image? Personally, I prefer colored pictures over black and white images, but I'll be fine with what the majority chooses. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
13:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- You mean this image? Personally, I prefer colored pictures over black and white images, but I'll be fine with what the majority chooses. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Black & White. Yea, but he lloks like he's made out plastic. I think it should be changed. And befoe you say "no, we're not doing that" i wan ther people's opinions. Jasca Ducato Sith Council (Sith campaign) 12:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- I also like the colored image. I dont understand what looks so plastic. And the b&w image doesnt really look like him. Lonnyd 19:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Good point. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
23:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Good point. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I also like the colored image. I dont understand what looks so plastic. And the b&w image doesnt really look like him. Lonnyd 19:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Why do they ALL look like Darth Maul +_+ lalala_la
- It's only the tatoos. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
13:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- You know, one of these days, we'll find out that there was a Zabrak Sith Lord that was tattooed just like all these guys who decided to go back in time to train under the all-powerful Darth Sidious. Except for unknown reasons he was never heard from again.... Lalala la 21:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Too bad Darth Maul was a mere tatoo-less child discovered by Sidious. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
21:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah....too bad Lalala la 22:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well, at least there are no stupid things like that in canon. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
23:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well, at least there are no stupid things like that in canon. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Yeah....too bad Lalala la 22:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Too bad Darth Maul was a mere tatoo-less child discovered by Sidious. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- You know, one of these days, we'll find out that there was a Zabrak Sith Lord that was tattooed just like all these guys who decided to go back in time to train under the all-powerful Darth Sidious. Except for unknown reasons he was never heard from again.... Lalala la 21:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Chagrian
It's interesting to note that the page on Chagrians states that they are relatively free of personal greed, and that it is Darth Wyyrlok that Krayt trusts, rather than any of the other Sith. BTS maybe?--Erl
- I don't think it's necessary. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
11:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Why
Does any one here know why Wyyrlok killed his master? they never explained it in the comic.--99.13.118.232 23:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think he killed him because as Wyyrlok dueled Andeddu he understanded that the sith alway search power. Killing his master he won the title of emperor (not oficialy), its the biggest power in the galaxy. Der3000er 18:02, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Darth Wyyrlok's Personality and traits
Clearly the Personality and Traits Section needs to be reworked as Wyyrlok showed no regret in his execution of Krayt.Perhaps he is even ambitious...—Unsigned comment by 173.17.248.153 (talk • contribs)
Dark Lord of the Sith?
Should Wyyrlok be classified as the Dark Lord of the Sith even though he hasn't publicly taken the title? I mean, he is the leader of the Sith now that Krayt is dead.
Dark lord of the sith
It hasn't been confirmed yet that he is dark lord of the sith even though on Tatooine Part 3 it says the sith are placing someone new on the throne.
What comic arc will it be confirmed that he is crowned dark lord of the sith?
(JM2008)
Date of Death
In War Sazen said its been a year since he met up with cade at the beginning of the series. The TPB for Extremes says the year for Extremes on is 138 ABY. Therefor (Ha!) I am changing the date of death to 138 AbY as well as the deaths in Extremes.--The Great and Grand Count Mall! 23:19, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
