Talk: Darth Krayt/Archive/A'Sharad Hett

Back to page |
< Talk:Darth Krayt

This page is an archive of the discussion of an article. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's current talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

Merge

A'Sharad and Sharad are two different people... --Fade 23:00, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

  • Agreed. --SparqMan 23:19, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Agreed. --Eion 00:16, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Removing merge request. Silly Dan 00:21, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Well how was I to know that. They both are humans who hang with Tusken Raiders. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:44, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Oh, I dunno, read the articles? --SparqMan 01:48, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • It's not been a good day. Easy for me to overlook that. -- Riffsyphon1024 02:30, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I would have thought the opening line made it clear. (ie son of Sharad Hett). :) QuentinGeorge 06:20, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Birth Year

Just putting this here because I didn't note it in my summary awhile back: I calculated A'Sharad Hett's birth year based on him being 15 in Outlander. --SparqMan 00:34, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Death

Where is his death by Vader mentioned? Haven't run across that before. --SparqMan 18:53, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Nowhere I know of. The latest comics have him alive, and he's not in ROTS the movie, novel or game. Reverting until mysterious anon comes up with a source. QuentinGeorge 06:12, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
    • Actually I have seen the comic where Vader kills him, but it may not be out yet.DarthMalus 20:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
      • No, you haven't. Hett survives Order 66 and returns to Tatooine. Thus far, there's been no material relating to his further adventures - Kwenn 18:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
        • It's not an official comic, but a fan project done by Dennis Budd. Very neat anyway. //Frostious 18:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
          • If it's not an official cannon source, it doesn't even bear mentioning on the talk page, much less in the article. Pahya

First Appearance?

Which issue of 'Outlander' was A'Sharad's First Appearance? I'd just wanted to knew.Thanks.

  • The fourth issue. Since it's a direct continuation from chapter 3 I suppose one could argue that he already made his appearence then - in a group of Tusken - but he isn't distinguished and identified until the next chapter. -Frostious 21:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

source for...

"He returned to his homeworld, and once again disguised himself as a Tusken Raider, preparing for his own private rebellion against the Galactic Empire. Beyond that, Hett's fate is unknown." Wondering what the source for this was. -- Falmarin 10:19, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • The New Essential Chronology. -Jaymach Ral'Tir 10:21, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
    • Anyone have any idea why they left this open ended? TV series anyone? Cutch 17:39, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Either that or whatever Republic's sucessor turns out to be. It's been rumored that Quin was spared his fate on Kashyyyk on the request of Lucas himself, so you never know.... - Kwenn 18:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Hurt the character

Does anyone else think that unmasking Hett kind of hurt him as a character? I thought his mystery was part of his charm. If this topic is a little too discussion based for the wiki I apologize. I'm just curious if anyone else thinks that.--DannyBoy7783 14:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Actually, I disagree. The unmasking was a very powerful issue, and actually gave much more depth to the character. QuentinGeorge 23:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
    • I can understand that argument but it's pretty standard to unmask characters these days. You don't often see them stay hidden.--DannyBoy7783 23:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm not going to speculate whether it hurt or improved his character, but personally I would've preferred they kept him masked. Like DannyBoy7783 said, I think his mask was a big part of his character - while he still is unique and interesting, I personally feel he became much more "common" of a character after they unmasked him. //Frostious 11:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Yeah, that's a big part of it. He was a Tusken Raider all his life. Once the mask came off he lost that and was just like everyone else. --DannyBoy7783 18:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I too believe that unmasking won't hurt a character it all depends. For the character behind a mask it gives some kind of mystery and intrigue behind the story and backgroung of the character but still what makes him or her a good character is the story and how is worked around him. For example Darth Vader and Boba Fett they are still great characters but their story and how it is done is what makes them whom they are. Still is up to the story teller or the writters to make them better or worse. -- (Darth_Venger 12:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC))

Death

  • An anon just added something about A'Sharad being killed by Aurra Sing. Is this canon or fanon?--Darth OblivionComlink20px 02:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • His Father, Sharad Hett, was killed by Aurra Sing. not A'Sharad. Quinlanfan 18:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Hett wasn't Killed at all. He's really Darth Krayt. Check the article on Krayt, same picture. There should probably be a page merge/removal on this one.
    • This is an old topic from long before that was known. This article has already been merged into Krayt, but won't be deleted till a month has past since the publication of Legacy #15.--Darth Oblivion 04:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Same Planet

  • Since Hett and Kenobi are both living on Tatooine (Possibly same area) why have they not seen each other? Quinlanfan 18:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
    • I suppose that they were hiding too well from the Empire to sense each other. And I think it's very unlikely that Kenobi would be in contact with Tusken Raiders. ;) Logisland 08:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • This may be answered in the upcoming Star Wars Legacy 16: Claws of the Dragon issue starring Obi-Wan. Just my opinion, but I think it would be wicked awesome if A'Sharad Hett is Darth Krayt. By issue 15 however, he would be about 184... Vezz801 01:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Issue 15 of Legacy answered the questions. It was great to see him back this time as a Sith Lord. No wonder he took that name, he was an expert using two blades and of course the tattoos on his face. But what I really like to see is what will be his background and the mystery behind him and Obi-Wan. -- (Darth_Venger 12:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC))

Tattoos

Are his tattoos Tusken or to do with his parents? They should probably be mentioned in the article.

ApprenticeEternal 18:04 22 April 2007

Speculation

Something about a rumor that A'Sharad is Darth Krayt should be added in the Behind the scenes section. Squishy Vic 05:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Nevermind I did it myself. If it's not OK, go ahead and remove it. Squishy Vic

Actually, it is now conformed that he is Darth Krayt. so should the 2 be merged?

Continuity question

The Mission to Boz Pity took place before the Saleucami Siege, didnt'it?--Tamarrion 14:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Fan speculation

Why is it so wrong to think that A'Sharad is Darth Krayt? I mean, there is speculation that Alek is Malak, Unknown hooded Jedi is Revan, Haazen is Darth Sion, but there can't be speculation that A'Sharad is Krayt? There is even a speculation that [[Unnamed Padawan]] is Krayt too, yet why can't it go on this article? Victor (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

HAHAHAHA! I WAS RIGHT! Victor (talk) 23:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Merging

There are two thing i want to point out 1stly A'Shared Dosen't appear until the fourth issue of outlander and 2ndly is it realy nessersary to have this page seeing how all the info has been copyed across to Darth Krayts page Dark Lord Xander (Embrace The Dark Side!)20px 07:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

  • This page remains until the Spoiler period is over, then it will be redirected. QuentinGeorge 07:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Wait, shouldn't Darth Krayt be redirected to this article instead? With all other Sith Lords whose original identity is known, their Sith name redirects to their birth name.Joser Kyind 15:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
      • Does it really make any difference?Darth Vatrir 23:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
        • Actually, Darth Bane's original name is unknown but we keep it there. It's whatever is the latest known identity. Though there are some very rare cases where consensus determines where it should go. Though the only case I recall is that of Kreia/Darth Traya...--Redemption20pxTalk 05:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
        • Darth Bane's birth name was Dessel, however, he changed his name to Bane (and then Darth Bane), totally abandoning his past identity. Our policy is to place Sith Lords under the last name they went by publically. Vader went by Vader, but was redeemed and returned to being Anakin. Sidious always went by Palpatine publically. Hett becomes Darth Krayt - publically. QuentinGeorge 05:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
          • Merge the articles. Please. We're an encyclopedia, and an encyclopedia has to be correct.