Talk: Battle of Krant

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Battle of Krant."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

How was this mentioned in True Colors? --The Wolfe22 16:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about the late reply, but it mentions some

expatriate Krantians, protesting about the pounding that their neutral planet had taken in a recent battle.

Good to know somebody mentions the events of Galactic Battlegrounds. ^^ — Aiddat (Holonet) (Contribs Log) New Jedi Order 00:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, and on a more important note, what's the source for the date? True Colors makes it sound like it was late 22 BBY or early 21 BBY, much later than a month ABG. — Aiddat (Holonet) (Contribs Log) New Jedi Order 00:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Just Curious

How did the Wookies escape imprisonment?Darthkenobi2010 23:30, August 10, 2011 (UTC)DarthKenobi2010

Dueling reference names

Both Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns and Star Wars: The Clone Wars video game are tagged with <ref name="GB:CC">. I could easily change the latter ref name to something like "SW:TCW" (currently not in use in the article), but the problem is that this reference is cited 62 more times throughout the article, and I have no way of knowing which ones are supposed to refer to Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns and which to The Clone Wars. It would be appreciated if someone familiar with both these games could resolve this issue. Thank you. Asithol (talk) 19:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

  • The second reference has been changed entirely, but nothing in the edit or its summary indicates whether the other 62 references were verified as coming from Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns. Asithol (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Quite simply, an editor added an item to prev, unrelated to the rest of the article, and was trying to use a new reference without changing the name. All references prior are fine. Since, it's has been move, re-referenced, and removed. Also, please note that since Auguest 2022, "prev", "conc", and "next" fields should only be filled with events in relation to the article, and those must be part of the article's body too. NanoLuukeCloning Facility 23:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)