Talk: Battle of Felucia (Outer Rim Sieges)/Legends

Back to page |
< Talk:Battle of Felucia (Outer Rim Sieges)
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Battle of Felucia (Outer Rim Sieges)/Legends."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

DeathStarTransp-SWE

Battle of Felucia (Outer Rim Sieges)/Legends is within the scope of WookieeProject Massive Damage, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles out of articles on battles and other conflicts.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Picture

Can someone put a pic of it up?--wattamb2000

  • Its not exactly easy to find an image of this Battle. The DVD hasn't even been released and what we have so far was officially released from LucasFilm or came from bootlegs. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:02, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Is this Canon? (I deleated pic)wattamb2000
    • If this is from the Hyperspace "Reversal of Fortune" webcomic, it is canon, but it would probably be a copyright violation for us to put it up. — Silly Dan 23:31, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • In the script she didnt talk: Another Jedi, BARRISS OFFEE, is cutting down a patrol of DROIDS when a CLONE WALKING TANK and SEVEN CLONE TROOPERS round a corner and blast the Jedi away. I dont think its canon.--wattamb2000
    • Cut scenes, adaptations of the films, and Expanded Universe stories taking place at the same time as the movies often add dialogue and detail to scenes, but these additions are still usually considered canon unless they contradict what ended up on screen. — Silly Dan 13:23, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • I just made a First Mission to Felucia article.--wattamb2000

Restart the Article?

  • Ok, looking at this article its a second by second copy of Reversal of Fortune. As detailed as it is, its toally unnecessary, and wookiefying it is a huge job and major waste of time IMO. Does anyone else think we shoudl just delete the main body of text and rewrite it? Itd be faster and easier than having to clean up the whole thing. Durnar 13:08, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • Might consider doing the same for the Reversal of Fortune article, then, which seems to have identical text. — Silly Dan 13:15, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
      • I agree, this article´s a mess. VT-16 16:47, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Death of Aayla Secura

I understand that there are several appearances of Order 66 and several texts about the death of certain Jedi. As I read the Death of two Jedi part, I thought I would ask the question: In which source did Aayla ask about the birds by Bly, who responded "no" and shot her in the back thereafter? It is not exactly the way we saw it in RotS. How much more canonical is this way of death than the one we saw in the movie? - TopAce 11:43, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Given that the movie's G-canon, it must be the ultimately canonic one, right? KEJ 12:02, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • It's from the RotS graphic novel. I'd say that qualifies. I'd post the scan I made, but I don't want to infringe on anything. -- AdmThrawn --
      • Graphic novel? Is that the same as a comic? - TopAce 12:17, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
        • Pretty much. It's just a big comic book with a hell of a lot more pages. --AdmThrawn 12:20, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
          • Or a collection of smaller comic books. It does count, I'd say, cause we simply don't see what Aayla just said, rather than having different dialogue.--Erl 22:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Renaming the Article ?

In light of the new information from Holocron Heist and the creation of the page First Battle of Felucia would it not be a good idea if we renamed this page Second Battle of Felucia. --217.42.188.199 19:13, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

  • No. It's better to leave this in its official title instead of moving it to a conjectural one just to satisfy chronology. CC7567 (talk) 19:28, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

182nd killed in action

since the 182nd leigion was killed off shouldn't it say killed in action?--70.253.79.240 01:31, February 10, 2010 (UTC)