Forum:TC:Weapons droid

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Weapons droid

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No consensus. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:10, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

Weapons droid (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

The main reason for this nomination is that the article claims these droids were battle droids abandoned by the empire, however closer inspection at the three pictured I noticed that they more resemble a hodge-podge assembly of other droids for use as battle droids. This idea is reinforced by the article itself—"Scavengers eventually obtained these inert droids, repairing, reactivating and reprogrammed them to serve for whatever personal cause they wished." Additionally the only place linking them is Dark Empire 1: The Destiny of a Jedi in the appearances section, and it was created in 07 by a user who went inactive that same year. Manoof (talk) 10:03, February 21, 2015 (UTC)

Delete

Manoof (talk) 10:03, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:46, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Unless I'm mistaken, the text in the image seems to suggest that "weapons droid" is a canonical name, which would dictate that the article should be kept but have the speculation/false information removed. Someone with the source should probably check closer, though. —MJ— Training Room 07:49, February 23, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Weapons droid is a canonical name alright, though the rest of the article is pretty much fanon. I've rewritten the article a bit to get rid of that. 501st dogma(talk) 12:20, February 23, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 14:35, February 23, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:50, February 23, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Trip391 (talk) 06:28, February 25, 2015 (UTC)
  6. Supreme Emperor (talk) 11:58, February 25, 2015 (UTC)
  7. I guess if it IS canon. I still think they're a hodge-podge of various droids made to be battle droids, but I admit that'd be as speculatory as the information dogma removed... Manoof (talk) 00:38, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Comments