Forum:TC:Unidentified Sith Inquisitor

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified Sith Inquisitor

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:33, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Sith Inquisitor (talk - history - links - logs)

Article non-specific in the extreme, describing a game mechanism instead of an actual Star Wars character. I move for deleting it. Gorthuar 20:13, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Delete

Per nominator. Master Jonathan — Jedi Council Chambers Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 20:18 UTC

Keep

  1. There'a lot of future potential for this article, as it can serve to outline the canonical events that occur in the course of a player's Sith Inquisitor path. We're soon going to have a lot of game content to catalog, some unique to each class, creating an article for a specific character for each class seems like a viable way of doing this. DD97Which bear is best? 20:22, October 25, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Same thing as Unidentified Jedi Knight (Clone Wars). Given that the Sith Inquisitor class (as with all others) is going to have a full, involved storyline to play through, the events and characters in that story need to link to the individual Sith Inquisitor. We can't tell the character's story through the general Sith Inquisitor article—that's not the place to talk about the activities and companions of a single individual. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 20:43, October 25, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Per Trayus and DangerDan. Bella'Mia 22:59, October 25, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Trayus and Dan have swayed me. I don't pay attention to TOR, so I wasn't aware of why we would need this article. Master Jonathan — Jedi Council Chambers Wednesday, October 26, 2011, 00:38 UTC
  5. I'm all for keeping the small stuff.--Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 01:34, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
  6. We actually need more of these articles, not fewer. Probably up to 16 of them. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 04:49, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
    • Are you thinking one lightside path and one darkside path per class? DD97Which bear is best? 15:03, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
  7. TOR will be the new TCW JangFett (Talk) 04:50, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
  8. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 04:54, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
  9. No, Jang. TOR's better. :P CC7567 (talk) 05:06, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
    • I should've said in a bad way. :P JangFett (Talk) 16:39, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
  10. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 05:10, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
  11. I don't see why this should be deleted. 1358 (Talk) 13:02, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
  12. Eh, why not. We can always delete it later. –Corellian PremierRobotechAll along the watchtower 15:58, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
  13. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 15:51, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
  14. I guess the only point in voting now is to make my edit count go up. :P MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 15:55, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
  15. Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:37, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
  16. Bandwagoning. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:02, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
  17. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:46, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

Discussion