Forum:TC:Star Trek

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Star Trek

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Grunny (talk) 10:20, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

Contents

  • 1 Star Trek vfdlinks|Star_Trek
    • 1.1 Delete
    • 1.2 Keep
    • 1.3 Discussion

Star Trek vfdlinks|Star_Trek

Uh... seriously? Why do we have this? It's basically an entire article full of OR/speculative comparisons with very few references. Let's kill this and be done with it. Master Jonathan — Jedi Council Chambers Saturday, July 16, 2011, 23:35 UTC

Delete

  1. As nominator. Master Jonathan — Jedi Council Chambers Saturday, July 16, 2011, 23:35 UTC
  2. All for that. Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 23:55, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Korsa3clicky 00:21, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 01:47, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Although it would have been fun to attempt to FA. Menkooroo 13:23, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Redundant.TK999—[Discuss] 13:34, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:21, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Gave this one some thought, and while keeping the Mirror, Mirror stuff may be debatable, I see no overbearing reason to keep this article. Anything of importance can be merged into a different article or articles (any of our "List of real-world reference"-type articles would do nicely, I'm sure) with a little bit of thought and work. If we're worried about the actual article name, maybe just redirecting "Star Trek" to the Mirror, Mirror article, or even a specific section in the Star Wars article, wouldn't be a bad idea. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:46, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
  9. Per Toprawa. Darth Karikawill destroy your planet! 22:28, July 27, 2011 (UTC)
  10. CC7567 (talk) 01:48, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
  11. Per Tope. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 19:39, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Very weak keep, for no other reason than we can't leave this article name unoccupied, and what else would we have it re-direct to? Additionally, I'm personally concerned that the IU Mirror, Mirror subjects are on the verge of getting wiped off the Wook. But that's a different argument for a different TC/CT. DD97Which bear is best? 14:06, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • Said subjects were deleted two years ago, so all that's left of that nonsense is the Mirror, Mirror article itself, and if I had my way, it would be gone as well, but that's a discussion to be held elsewhere. Master Jonathan — Jedi Council Chambers Monday, July 18, 2011, 20:40 UTC
  2. Keep and reference, or move to List of references to Star Wars in X. Otherwise this stuff would just turn into trivia in the articles. Corellian PremierRobotechAll along the watchtower 20:06, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Discussion

  • Are all the references in said article already mentioned on the pages that are specifically for references (like the page for all TV references. I forget the actual names atm)? If not they should be placed their before this article's deletion. Korsa3clicky 00:20, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • A lot of the information could be referenced. Would we move it to List of references to Star Wars in television? Corellian PremierRobotechAll along the watchtower 19:40, July 17, 2011 (UTC)