Forum:TC:RiffTrax

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:RiffTrax

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

RiffTrax (talk - history - links - logs)

Totally unnecessary. If we're going to have an article on this, we might as well have an article on all film websites that mention Star Wars. Unit 8311 20:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Per Unit 8311. --Imperialles 20:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Per myself. Unit 8311 20:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. And the adds to the side are really annoying. But anyway, in all seriousness, per the above. Chack Jadson (Talk) 20:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Baby steps. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 03:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Are we going to have an article for the production company behind the Family Guy spoof now? It's just not relevant to Star Wars. Havac 18:04, 14 February 2008 (EST)
    • But the Family Guy spoof is. If we were to go from your analogy, we should have separate articles for each of the four SW RiffTrax. And I doubt anyone would prefer that. This is just a more convenient way to represent them. Gonk (Gonk!) 23:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. I don't see how it's any different from Chad Vader, which it is at least as notable as. Gonk (Gonk!) 20:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Maybe it's because Chad Vader is related in some way to Star Wars, unlike this...? Unit 8311 20:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Or it could be because RiffTrax has produced multiple Star Wars parodies, and that's why it's handy to have an article for them?--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 23:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Per Gonk.--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 21:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Anyone TCing Chad Vader will be banished from the Willy Street Co-op. Graestan(Talk) 03:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Per Gonk. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 13:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Per Gonk. (Always wanted to say that) Enochf 08:12, 14 February 2008 (EST)
  6. Per myself, above. -LtNOWIS 23:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Notable parody site. If anything have their Star Wars parodies covered. Additionally, they made a reference to Wookieepedia. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Ozzel 08:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. Gonk! KEJ 17:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  10. Notable parody. —Silly Dan (talk) 03:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)