Forum:TC:Polygyny

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 15:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Polygyny (talk - history - links - logs)

This topic does not need an article. The only thing it has that a Wikipedia link doesn't is that Cereans and Kaleesh practiced polygyny, and that Ki-Adi-Mundi was allowed to. Those three articles should include that info anyway, with a link to wikipedia:Polygyny. Delete -- AckbarSigdmirableAckbar (It's A Trap!) 18:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. It's a canonical concept and the article deal with multiple appearances of it in Star Wars canon in a way a simple Wikipedia link can't. It's easily as valid as breast, governor, or any of a hundred other articles. Havac 19:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Unless you can guarantee that the Wikipedia page will have a comparison of polygyny in the Star Wars galaxy (which it never will), our needs cannot be served by a simple Wikipedia link. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 21:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Per Havac and multiple appearances, and the fact that as we find out more about the ins and outs of Cerean, Kaleesh, and other cultures, there very well may be even more differences. But for now a catalog of current instances seems enough to warrant an article. Wildyoda 01:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep since it is obviously significant in relation to Ki-Adi. KEJ 09:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • HECK KEEP!! It's from canon sources, has two appearances, it's no more canonical than your Ephant Mon's ship creation. Acky, I guess you're no inclusionist, but the inclusionists have said it all. Per everyone. Jediknight19bby (Jedi High Council Chambers!) 20:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I'll close this with a "keep" result, though I'd be inclined to go with Ackbar's delete reasoning myself. —Silly Dan (talk) 15:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)