This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Notable lines in Star Wars (talk - history - links - logs)
This article is redundant, considering other OOU lists such as the similarities or common elements of the films, and the lists of references. The structure also comes across as being a trivia page.--Goodwood 
(Alliance Intelligence) 04:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete
- Goodwood
(Alliance Intelligence) 04:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC) - Imperialles 08:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep
- Ozzel 04:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Question: Why delete an article on *notable* lines? Vote: keep. Snide comment: Purgism should be deleted. KEJ 15:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Though I do wish KEJ would shut up. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Dude, just ignore me. :-P KEJ 20:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Per KEJ. Unit 8311 19:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- JMAS Hey, it's me! 04:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Beh...why not.Tank 16:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- You're kidding, right? -- Riffsyphon1024 17:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Per Riffsyphon. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 17:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Though it could use some work, and perhaps a move as Thunderforge suggests below. Gonk (Gonk!) 22:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Comments
It might be more helpful to rename the article to something more descriptive to help show it's purpose. Something like "Recurring lines in the Star Wars saga" or something that sounds a bit better. Thunderforge 19:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)