Forum:TC:Necropolis system

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Necropolis system

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.—Silly Dan (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Necropolis system (talk - history - links - logs)

Broken redirect; has no page linking to it or from it. While the planet exists (Necropolis), this seems useless as long as there is no page for the Dahrtag system (which was deleted on suspicion of fanon). Master Aban Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 19:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Master Aban Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 19:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Imperialles 20:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. --Eyrezer 20:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Unit 8311 20:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. With extreme prejudice.--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 20:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 02:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Ozzel 02:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Graestan(Talk) 15:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 15:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  10. Isn't there precedent for CSDing this? -- Darth Culator (Talk) 03:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
    Yes: conjecturally named solar systems have long been considered for speedy deletion. Closing this early. —Silly Dan (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Keep