This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete the list, due to split in consensus between that and "delete outrigt". Graestan(Talk) 22:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Contents
List of Star Wars TV Spots (talk - history - links - logs)
This is not another act of the lists purge, but rather an attempt to wipe out the entire category Category:TV Spots with all its content: Adventure (TV), Forbidden Love and List of Star Wars TV Spots. The reason is: come o-on, people! We do not have articles about every individual Star Wars movie trailer, why should we have articles about TV spots? Mauser 08:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete
- Per my nom. Mauser 08:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Kill it with napalm.--Goodwood
(Alliance Intelligence) 08:41, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hyperinclusionism is BAD. I think Vector Prime television commercial should be next. QuiGonJinnBe mindful of the Living Force...
10:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete the list only. Keep the rest. This isn't hyperinclusionism; this is just inclusionism. jSarek 10:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wipe them out. All of them. Thefourdotelipsis 13:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Chack Jadson (Talk) 13:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Gray Jedi 09:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep
Delete the list only, Keep the rest
- Since this is its own option now . . . jSarek 21:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- I wasn't around in '77 to see some of those TV Spots, so I think it's interesting. I'm sure other people do too. List is unnecessary, but the other information is not. Wildyoda 16:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- JMAS Hey, it's me! 17:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- I laugh in the face of deletionism. -- Riffsyphon1024 16:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keeping the information doesn't kill me, but keeping a list does. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments
- Per jSarek, but I think another option might be prudent. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)